Thread: MPG vs L/100k
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10th February 2007, 09:26 PM
vnx205's Avatar
vnx205 vnx205 is offline
Wizard
Subscriber
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tuross Head, South Coast, NSW
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 88
Thanked 473 Times in 278 Posts
It really has nothing to do with imperial or metric. The point is do you really want to know how far you can go on a set amount of fuel or do you want to know how much fuel you need to cover a set distance. Km/litre is just as bad as mpg.
The problem with dealing with percentages is that a high figure for mpg really means a small amount of fuel used, so the same percentage change would mean a smaller saving in fuel than a low mpg figure with the same percentage change.
A 100% improvement on 28mpg will save you about 5 litres every 100 km or about 1000 litres a year.
A 100% improvement on 56 mpg will save about 2.5 litres every 100 km or about 500 litres a year. They are both 100% improvements, but one saves twice as much as the other.
__________________

1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 -
- often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

Reply With Quote