Thread: MPG vs L/100k
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10th February 2007, 09:59 PM
vnx205's Avatar
vnx205 vnx205 is online now
ChatterBox
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tuross Head, South Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,612
Thanks: 220
Thanked 889 Times in 536 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dm_td5 View Post
I still think kJ/km would be even better (especially for those with a V8)
If you mean you measure the energy input required to cover a set distance, then I would agree with you because it is using the same logic of measuring fuel (or energy) used over a set distance. After all it is a fuel consumption figure, so it should be stated as an amount of fuel (or energy) consumed over a set distance.
__________________

1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 -
- often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

Reply With Quote