Thread: MPG vs L/100k
View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10th February 2007, 11:08 PM
ladas's Avatar
ladas ladas is offline
ChatterBox
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Kyabram, VIC 3620
Posts: 2,618
Thanks: 18
Thanked 132 Times in 108 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vnx205 View Post
I was just trying to make the maths simple by using 100%.
By the way a 100% improvement on 28 mpg is 56 mpg, (not 14 mpg as you state)
I would have though that it was more important to know the actual change in consumption rather than the percentage. After all as you point out yourself, it depends on what it is a percentage of. That was one of the points I was trying to make.
Yes I see your point - and sorry yes 100% on 28 is 56 - blonde moment

But a gpm improvement is exactly the same as a l/100km

Oh bugger it I give up
Reply With Quote