Thread: MPG vs L/100k
View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 21st January 2008, 10:13 PM
p38arover's Avatar
p38arover p38arover is offline
Super English Ninja
 

Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 15,317
Thanks: 358
Thanked 1,258 Times in 911 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
The only logical advantage to mpg over litres/100km is that it is in the form unit/unit rather than unit/100units. As far as I know Australia is the only place this particular unit is used, elsewhere it is km/litre (
Not true. Canada and Europe use it. See also Keys Corner » Blog Archive » Where do people use “km/liter” for fuel consumption?

and from an EEC Directive:

Quote:
Commission Directive 93/116/EC of 17 December 1993 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 80/1268/EEC relating to the fuel consumption of motor vehicles

<snip>

7. CALCULATION OF FUEL CONSUMPTIONS
7.1. The fuel consumptions are calculated from the emissions of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide calculated in accordance with paragraph 6.
7.2. The fuel consumptions expressed in litres per 100 km are calculated using the following formulae:
(a) for petrol-engined vehicles:
(b) for diesel-engined vehicles:
where:
FC = fuel consumption in litres per 100 km;
Note the Directive is dated 1993.
__________________
Ron B.

1995 P38A Range Rover 4.6 V8 Auto; 1968 LR Series IIA trayback (Holden 202); Yamaha XJR1300, Suzuki V-Strom

----------

RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

Last edited by p38arover; 21st January 2008 at 10:16 PM..
Reply With Quote