Thread: MPG vs L/100k
View Single Post
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 23rd January 2008, 02:40 PM
p38arover's Avatar
p38arover p38arover is online now
Super Roving English Ninja
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 19,021
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 2,458 Times in 1,763 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushie View Post
The real problem lies with the 'imperial' system.

Mile - Nautical or Statute
Furlong/Chain/Yard/Foot

But then of course there was the imperial 'metric' measurements in land surveying where a chain was 100 links.

Not to mention acres, rods, roods and perches never did get the hang of them.
Apropos your comments, I came across these relationships which are remarkable, really:

See Earth,Pi,Miles and Barleycorns

I particularly like:

Quote:

Taking the satellite figure means that our current mile is too long by 2.155 inches - the thickness of two thumbs. Which works out at less than the radius of the earth over a distance from here to the Sun. This minute discrepancy of a couple of inches can hardly be measured on a one to one map ( if we had one!), and means that our mile has been an accurate geodesic measure since goodness knows when.
__________________
Ron B.

1995 P38A Range Rover HSE 4.6 V8 Auto; 1968 LR Series IIA trayback (Holden 202); Yamaha XJR1300, Suzuki DL650 V-Strom



RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever
Reply With Quote