Australian Land Rover Owners

Freight Calc Gallery Games Arcade Markets Shop Chat Subscribe! Donate Files Links
Go Back   Australian Land Rover Owners > The Pinnacles > Discovery > D3 / D4 / RRS

D3 / D4 / RRS D3 / D4 zone is the place for all that specialist D3 / D4 info (and the RRS stuff even though they don't like to think of it as a disco).

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 20th May 2008, 03:45 PM
Desert Traveller's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 137
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Have a look at the resale values of V6 vs TDV6. The extra cost of the TDV6 can be recooped in the increased resale price. A number of mags have done this exercise recently. New, TDV6 is better buying.
Second hand a V6 is better buying.
I went TDV6 for safety in the desert as I don't like petrol refuelling from jerries in the middle of no-where.
Someone will disagree, but this my personal view.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 20th May 2008, 04:11 PM
WhiteD3's Avatar
YarnMaster
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 1,870
Thanked 1,042 Times in 566 Posts
No offense DT, but I'm not convinced by your "value" argument.

New:
V6 SE - $65k drive away
TDV6 SE - 75K + on roads, say another 4k?, so in total 14k more?

Redbook on a 2006 SE - 30-50km
V6 SE $47.6 to $51.7 private sale
TDV6 SE $53.7 to $58.2 private sale, so say an average of 6k more than the V6 SE.

So after 4 years I sell my V6 for 6k less than what I would if it was a TDV6, but I saved 14k up front. Gee, even if it was 10k less, I still had 14k in my pocket for 4 years! I think the running costs will be about the same over the period (I get 15s around town, my mate in a TDV6 gets 12s). His econ is better but he's paying more.

Don't get me wrong; I kill for the TD but from an economic stand point only, I think the V6 wins the case.

Also, if the mags are comparing the V6SE with the TDV6 S, then there's no comparison. I doubt there's any D3 drivers on the forum who'd vote for a coil sprung D3 over the air sprung, TR SE.

If there was a V6 S then maybe it'd be a different argument.

Cheers.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Traveller View Post
Have a look at the resale values of V6 vs TDV6. The extra cost of the TDV6 can be recooped in the increased resale price. A number of mags have done this exercise recently. New, TDV6 is better buying.
Second hand a V6 is better buying.
I went TDV6 for safety in the desert as I don't like petrol refuelling from jerries in the middle of no-where.
Someone will disagree, but this my personal view.
__________________
Disco 4 2.7 2011
Disco 3 V6 SE 2007 - Took us everywhere in style
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48686896@N03/

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 24th May 2008, 10:45 PM
Desert Traveller's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 137
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
WhiteD3,
I travel around 45k per year. based on real fuel useage the way I drive, the TDV6 saves around 4-6 litres/100 kms. Even allowing for the 12-15% higher cost for diesel, I'm a long way ahead after just 3 years (having recooped the extra cost) the additional resale is a bonus if I was to sell.
The redbook values will now be distorted with diesel @170/litre and Ron98 well over 150/litre.
I looked very hard at the V6 based on the lower buy in price, but after a whole of life analysis. the TDV6 came out ahead. Doing less than about 30k per year the V6 comes out ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 11:53 AM
Fossicker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurie View Post
It looks like 2009 will be a very busy year for Land Rover.

It’s also likely that we’ll see the Discovery’s current 2.7-litre V6 diesel grow to 3.0-litres.
that would be good. I'll definitely try to get one then.

current 2.7-litre V6 diesel is still not "that" good compared with X5's single turbo in line diesel. BMW's twin turbo diesel 3.0 is 2008 engine of the year, a true monster. wish we can have a similar one on D3.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 12:20 PM
Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,578
Thanks: 79
Thanked 303 Times in 260 Posts
The 3 litre probably won't be any better on the figures as it is being increased in dispacement to deal with the new euro emmissions target.
The LR TDV8 engine is a corker and only single turbo. Wish they put it in the D3.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 08:05 PM
Fossicker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
The 3 litre probably won't be any better on the figures as it is being increased in dispacement to deal with the new euro emmissions target.
The LR TDV8 engine is a corker and only single turbo. Wish they put it in the D3.


TDV8 will be excellent if it's in the D3, but I guess who would buy a RR then?

If D3 is anything short in my opinion, it would be its diesel model on road 0-100km/s performance, 12s..., X5 needs about 8s... I know, I know, I can't get everything
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 08:17 PM
WhiteD3's Avatar
YarnMaster
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 1,870
Thanked 1,042 Times in 566 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by weirluo View Post


TDV8 will be excellent if it's in the D3, but I guess who would buy a RR then?

If D3 is anything short in my opinion, it would be its diesel model on road 0-100km/s performance, 12s..., X5 needs about 8s... I know, I know, I can't get everything
The D3 is a 4WD and probably the most capable ever built. The X5 is not.

It's really a question of what you want to do....blow away cruisers at the lights or go off road/tour/tow.
__________________
Disco 4 2.7 2011
Disco 3 V6 SE 2007 - Took us everywhere in style
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48686896@N03/

Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 09:54 PM
Jamo's Avatar
ChatterBox
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Nedlands, WA
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 539
Thanked 235 Times in 176 Posts
Weirluo, I think you may be looking at the wrong vehicle for your needs.

If straight line performance is your game, then I'd be looking at the RRS TDV8 rather than the D3.

You'll find the RRS is a much better vehicle than the Beemer shopping trolley!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 6th June 2008, 05:20 PM
Fossicker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamo View Post

You'll find the RRS is a much better vehicle than the Beemer shopping trolley!

I agree almost all BMW cars are over priced and somewhat over praised as well by its beemer/fans.

However, Land Rover badge is way behind BMW. this is especially true in Australia after its taken over by Tata.

No offence, everyone, I love D3 myself. it's a shame that LR could not maintain its prestige as a top end brand.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 6th June 2008, 07:03 PM
Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,578
Thanks: 79
Thanked 303 Times in 260 Posts
LR still has presige in Europe. It all comes down to marketing in recent years BMW, Mercades an Lexus have marketed themselves as prestige brands. Look at the old Lexus SUV, it's a Kluger but people bought who wouldn't dream of buying a Toyota.
Oz is too small a market for LR to really bother putting the dollars into marketing.
There again if they had done so we would be payong more for out Landys.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:15 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Australian Land Rover Owners
Copyright ©2001 - 2012, Dave Blears and aulro.com