the rubber donut between the prop shaft and the dif on my car is gone, soon after being replaced..
I'm guessing one of 2 problems...
1. when I was in the dunes on weekend I played in 2wd to prove to a cruiser friend my car could go further than his (and since it did, it might of been worth wrecking the donut)
2. it was put in wrong in the first place..
is there a way to put them in? I know there are rubber plates under some parts, and not under others... does anyone have a way to know how to put it in? or pictures...
ta
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
doesn't d1 rear have more power than the front wheels when the 4h or 4l is not engaged...
i guess you mean you didn't put the centre diff lock in, as the car is constant four wheel drive,
it doesn't matter,
the car was designed with the donut coupling and that sort of drive train coupling has been around for many years,
i had a 450 mercedes with one, and have seen many high performance racing cars with these things.
i have a disco still running one and it is nearly done now, but it is 17 years old now,
how old?
didn't think it was that old!
290 kms but it is still doing it's job.
if you put a new one in and it's buggered now after a short time, i'd be looking at what the installation was like, tailshaft balance, the centre bush condition and what you may have driven over.
in another car, v8 disco,
i got stuck once on a log crossing and with guidance managed to get off the log,
problem was that i was using the donut to slide the car along the log,
exit one donut, but it got me home.
many critics on here deride the coupling, but if you don't drive sideways on logs, it is a good thing, i actually think i should never have changed the other car to a rear uni.
nope its an unbiased drive system, in any range with the TC unlocked it will send all of the torque to the wheel that can use it least.
With the TC locked it will send it 50/50 (or 100/100 depending on your understanding of driveline theory) to the front and rear crownwheels which will then decide which wheel can make least use of the available torque and send it that way.
Its kind of like tax cuts really. Those who dont need them get them and those that do dont.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
There isn't much to get wrong with installing the donut - if you can post a pic of the destroyed one, it may help in figuring out what happened.
Pictures, it's still in place, getting changed today
I've been told in the past that there are 2 sources of these couplings. The genuine GKN one, and dodgy aftermarket ones.
I've also noticed myself when fitting one that there are 3 thick parts separated by three thin areas. Does it make any difference whether the thick bit is under compression or tension under normal forward drive torque? I cant see anything in the RAVE manual that says to put them one way or the other.
BTW - your one is stuffed
Steve
Not even 5000kms of travel![]()
MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
1998 Triumph Daytona T595
1974 VW Kombi bus
1958 Holden FC special sedan
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks