A little analysis tends to show that the weight is a minor issue. Because the ends studs break it would suggest that it is combination of the type of metal used in the manifold casting, allowing considerable expansion under heat conditions, and typical manufacturing cost savings of using the smallest cheapest studs that will (usually) do the job.
A small change in either of these conditions such as the next stud size, or a metal recipe change in the casting might have stopped all this, but would have cost land rover heaps of money over the manufacturing lifetime of the td5.
That's why we have an aftermarket industry, because manufacturers produce something that works, then cheapen it down to save overall costs and maximise profits. Along comes the buyer and generally all is ok, but then the small, and sometimes larger issues appear and it's up to the aftermarket industry to help out....no cost to landrover, the aftermarket industry makes money, and we pay thru the nose, again, and again......
Let's face it, if the d2 was made the way we think it should have been, none of us would need to modify them would we?
Cheers
Kev
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				Kev
2005 TDV6HSE D3
2006 V8HSE D3
99 TD5 D2 (Gone)
97 RR Autobiography original (Gone)
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks