|
|||||||
| Freelander_2 Chat specifically relating to Freelander (series 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
FL2 diesel performance
Hi everyone.
I've bitten the bullet and decided to buy a Freelander 2 but I have not yet decided whether to get a petrol or diesel. As most driving will be highways and town I am leaning towards the petrol, but having driven both the diesel impresses me as it feels stronger everywhere except a brief pause from standstill. Has anyone put a performance chip in a TD4? Does it overcome this lag? Does it improve acceleration significantly? The gains quoted by various chip manufacturers are significant but are they accurate? Are there any other performance modifications worth considering? It might be better for me to just get the petrol... Thanks for your advice. |
|
|||
|
The diesel is fantastic and economical too. Can't recommend it highly enough.
Mike |
| The Following User Says Thank You to mikehzz For This Useful Post: | ||
oldwhippet (3rd February 2010) | ||
| The Following User Says Thank You to nosliwedaw For This Useful Post: | ||
oldwhippet (3rd February 2010) | ||
|
||||
|
TD4 is a fantastic engine. If you want a 0-100 machine then the FL2 is not for you regardless of the engine options.
Can I ask why would highway and city driving suggest a petrol when this type of driving is most suitable to a diesel? Only reason I'd choose a petrol if I was doing lots of short trips where the engine did not have a chance to reach operating temperature often.
__________________
![]() PERENTIE FL2 TD4 |
| The Following User Says Thank You to inside For This Useful Post: | ||
oldwhippet (3rd February 2010) | ||
| Please support our Advertisers |
|
||||
|
do not buy a i6,,, its all noise and no go,,, and around town the econ is treble,, on the cars coming in the avg for td4 is about 8-9LPH,, the i6 its 12s
and performance is not that good for a 6,, pretty much all the customers i talk to wish they got the td4 i no of no chip for the td4
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to stig0000 For This Useful Post: | ||
oldwhippet (3rd February 2010) | ||
|
|||
|
Thanks for all your responses.
I was thinking that mainly stop-start city driving suits the i6 more since that's where I noticed the flat spot off idle in the TD4. Once up and running on the highway and for overtaking I suppose there wouldn't be much in it in terms of performance and I suspect that the TD4 would be more economical. The TD4 did feel very strong once it was moving and since I am coming from a diesel pajero maybe the flat spot feels exagerated since as soon as the power kicks in on the TD4 it goes like a rocket when compared with the gradual build up of speed in the pajero. Sounds like I need to go for another test drive. I'll keep you posted of the outcome. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Look at the spec & you'll see the i6 is a 200 kph car. 0-100 kph also leaves the TD4 for dead. It's a Jekkyl & Hyde car. The power & torque curves are quite peaky, the opposite of the TD4. Around town its easy enough to drive, the jackrabbit throttle response you sometimes get with quick cars isn't there. But if you need the get-&-up-&-go, the trans will soon drop a gear or two. Overtaking is very easy & very quick. If you really need poke, its there in the top half of the rev range. Otherwise it potters along quite happily on the highway at say 2000 rpm. The fuel economy thing is a red herring. One day people will realise fuel is the cheapest part of ownership*. And for the record, I've found the i6 is the same if not cheaper with fuel than the Td4 on the highway. It runs on E10, and around Dubbo, Coonabarrabran etc the E10 can be cheaper than diesel. Mine gets economy in the 9s at 100 kph. It was the diesel rattle at idle that put me off the Td4 actually. I don't think its good enough. So for me, the i6 has quite acceptable fuel consumption around town, in Falcon/Commodore territory. With Falcon/Commodore performance. On the highway its smoother, quieter, costs the same to run, with more poke if you need it. Regards Max P * Had a client in not so long ago, whinging about the fuel economy of his BMW. Turns out he puts $2000 a year of petrol in it. But its now worth $50,000, bought two years ago for $150,000. Fuel isn't the problem! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tusker For This Useful Post: | ||
oldwhippet (18th February 2010) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I Can retune the current FL2 Diesels. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
and the sound of the turbo spooling up. I was disappointed with the TDv6 in Dad's RRS... its dead quiet!
__________________
06 SE V6 Discovery 3 |
|
|||
|
The economy of the diesel has actually bitten me in the backside as I drive the car more now because it doesn't feel expensive. This means I'm probably spending the same amount on fuel but doing more kms which is bad for resale and wear and tear. My previous car was a 6 cylinder 180 kw Subaru Outback and it could do 0-100 in about 8 seconds but my FL2 diesel is a way better car in my opinion.
At the end of the day it's personal preference, the dollars are pretty much swings and roundabouts. Mike |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|