Things to note:
1) Gratuitous mention of 'miracle' on the front cover
2) Sweeping statements 'virtually all diseases'
3) The disclaimer on page 2 pretty much debunks the whole premise of the book (not to be taken as medical advice, this contains opinions of the author, etc)
...And one of the most professionally disturbing aspects of this book is the bibliography list. Despite the lack of any credible, Modern, high-tier peer reviewed literature to back up the claims the author makes, the most disturbing fact is that the author has not only referenced a Journal of the American Medical Association article from 1888 (YES, 130 YEARS OLD)... But she has also incorrectly referenced it as a 1988 article. (Journal of the American Medical Association, March 4, 1988 - Vol. 259, No. 9, page 1279- refer reference list on page 112 of the .pdf doc).
How the **** can a modern 'breakthrough' book of new found miracle cures rely on a 130 year old excerpt of a paper that is nothing more than a doctor from the dark ages speaking to other doctors in the gentlemen's club. FFS they were still blood letting as a cure for miasma back then
**** like this really ****es me off. There are people out there, MY academic peers who invest their lives into research for actual medicine. People who work 18+ hours a day toward their Phd thesis or in university labs for little / no recognition outside of the academic literature (if you are really lucky, you get your name on the paper). I myself studied with these people during my biomedical science degree working on a molecular biochemistry project aimed toward mapping the protein pathways in a common gene known to be expressed in breast cancer. But there is always some nut-bag like the author of this crap who relies on opinion, hearsay and BS to sell an book to the people who should probably be taking more professional advice.
/rant.
Bookmarks