Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Hydrogen Fuel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ballajura, Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Hydrogen Fuel

    At a going away reception for the receptionist at site, l was talking to an engineer who drives a Discovery D2 TD5 and he was saying that he has imported a piece of kit from Italy to convert the D2 to run on Hydrogen gas and he would be making his own hydrogen gas a litre of distilled water makes 18,000 litres of gas and he was also going to convert his home heating to Hydrogen gas. He was saying biggest problem was finding space within engine bay for the conversion equipment as he wanted to keep piping as shot as possible for the Hydrogen gas.

    I will try and get some better details from him when l go back to site next week and post.

    Anyone else heard of the conversion process and is it only suitable for Diesel powered vehicles

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A friend recently put a water to gas convertor in his TD5 D2 and reckons he's using up to 16% less fuel. But still early days and he's waiting to get more milage.

    Basically electrodes in water make Browns Gas, which is seperating the oxygen and the hydrogen atoms which bubble up and get sucked into the air intake. I can't remember if he put it pre or post turbo.

    I haven't heard of anything that makes enough gas to power the vehicle completely. There's a lot of (often conflicting) opinion on the net. I'd like to get a chance to play around with the unit in the Disco and see how much gas per min it actually produces.

    I can understand how a TD5 may lean out the mix, but I don't know how a Tdi will improve economy if it relies on mechanical injection.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    err.................................rubbish.

    Two things:

    First, the energy required to separate hydrogen from water is huge, you're talking power stations, not alternators!

    Second, if it was so simple, we'd all be doing it.

    A good article can be found here.

    http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1769/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Jimboomba, QLD
    Posts
    1,293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cartm58 View Post
    ... a litre of distilled water makes 18,000 litres of gas
    At what pressure?? A fundamental gas law is that a gas will expand to occupy its container. From 1 litre of water, 111g of hydrogen is produced. Put it what ever sized container you like and claim the volume you want!

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteD3 View Post
    err.................................rubbish.

    Two things:

    First, the energy required to separate hydrogen from water is huge, you're talking power stations, not alternators!
    Well ... not quite. It can be done with low power supplies, but you can not produce hydrogen at a rate that is anywhere near sufficient to power a car or to improve an existing fuel supply. I have separated water many times as a demo for science classes. In 40mins you are lucky to produce 100mL of hydrogen (at atmospheric pressure). Not enough to power a car, but enough to make an impressive pop when ignited.

    Simply looking at energy conversions and losses, it is simply not and will never be viable to power an internal combustion engine with hydrogen as it is being produced from electroyzed water.


    Paul
    -- Paul --


    | '99 Discovery Td5 5spd man with a td5inside remap | doesn't know what it is in for ...
    | '94 Discovery Tdi 5spd man | going ... GONE

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A friend of mine has his 130 4BD1 turbo on it, and has claimed a lot better fuel efficiency.
    The only thing I'm concerned about, (although apparently there is a VERY low risk of this actually happening,) is that it is drawn in to the intake system and then compressed through the turbo, intercooler and then forced into the inlet manifold therefore creating a compressed mixture of air and Hydrogen gas, which Is highly combustible with even the smallest of ignition sources.(IE the Hindenberg...)

    My concern is that at any given time, a highly flammable gas is under pressure in an easily rupturable (in the case of a vehicle accident) vessel, an aluminium intercooler, front mounted....One spark after a collision and

    The science of adding hydrogen gas to the intake system is as far as I can tell sound, but I am worried about the safety issues with turboed engines. Naturally aspirated diesels don't have anywhere near the risks..................No compressed extremely flammable gasses.

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by awabbit6 View Post
    Well ... not quite. It can be done with low power supplies, but you can not produce hydrogen at a rate that is anywhere near sufficient to power a car or to improve an existing fuel supply.
    Touche'.

    What I was trying to say, none too clearly, was that you can't get something for nothing, ie free energy. To create hydrogen from water with current technology, you have to put in more energy (electricity) than the energy (hydrogen) you get out.

    Nothing is free, you always lose something.

    Now find me a kit that sits in the garage, which is full of algae or bacteria which breaks down the water to give hydrogen, which I can then compress overnight and pump into a tank in my car, which will run it for say 100k (daily commute)................and I'm sold!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The subject has been broached before and from experience you will get a lot of negative feedback and possibly some quite nasty replies from people who do not believe hydrogen is a viable option. If this belief was held by all we would not have electricity, lpg, space travel, aeroplanes etc etc, most of these and many more have broken scientific boundaries. Probablly at this time it is not a cost effective option as a stand alone fuel, but there is some evidence of benefits of it being used as an assist fuel. Set up costs may also still be prohibitive.
    There is a lot of work going on in this area and who knows in 10 or 20 years time someone may unravel some widely held scientific beliefs and make it work on large scale. One can only hope someone does crack it. There have been a few shows on foxtel lately relating to this subject and the research is very interesting.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Craig,

    Don't get me wrong; I'm a believer in the hydrogen economy (or at least transport), with LPG/LNG being the bridging fuel until we get the technology right.

    What I'm against is people using the hype to rip others off!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lot of misinformation here.

    Hi WhiteD3, your half correct. While you actually can use low voltages to produce large quantities of hydrogen, the problem is not low the volt voltage but that a huge amount of current is required to make enough hydrogen to power a vehicle, many time the amount of energy that the hydrogen would be able to supply.

    Hi Justic, I think you will find the hydrogen and air mixture is no more dangerous then the existing fuel air mixture found in any petrol powered vehicle and an other point, the Hindenburg was not bought down by it’s hydrogen flotation gas but by the rocket fuel they used to put a reflective coating on the outside surface of the Zeppelin.

    In the future, hydrogen may very well be the fuel of fuels but at this present time, both the extraordinary weight of the storage vessel needed to carry the gas and huge amounts of power needed to produce hydrogen in quantities of much less power makes it a fuel of little use, at this time, for day to day transport.

    If anyone is interested in finding out the real facts about hydrogen, do a google search for “dr Billings”, he is probably the worlds leading expert on the subject.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Lot of misinformation here.

    Hi WhiteD3, your half correct. While you actually can use low voltages to produce large quantities of hydrogen, the problem is not low the volt voltage but that a huge amount of current is required to make enough hydrogen to power a vehicle.
    Tim, I didn't mention voltage, rather energy and in the case of electricity we're talking kWs of the stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    many time the amount of energy that the hydrogen would be able to supply.
    My point exactly; nothings free.

    And Dr Billings "Very clever guy, big in IT, had an interest in Hydrogen early on, not a Dr.

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!