Advertisement
|
Advertisement
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gallery | Links | Files | Subscribe! | Chat | Markets | Shop | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Series 2 and 2a Chat specifically relating to Series II and IIa leaf sprung series land rovers and variations. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
chassis dimensions
can anoyne tell me if there is a difference between the civvy and military chassis dimensions at points "N" and "Q" or are the shackles the only difference.
Borrowed the pic from Dave's trailer thread. Thanks in advance to the aulro brainstrust. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to JDNSW For This Useful Post: | ||
Olive Drab (26th September 2008) | ||
|
||||
|
Hi Mate , the mil chassis is close to the 2 inches higher mark than the civvy chassis . The army welded on longer hangers and used longer shackles . I can take a couple of pics if you like of the mil chassis .
__________________
Cheers Mick May the south rise again
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Fusion For This Useful Post: | ||
Olive Drab (26th September 2008) | ||
|
|||
|
thanks
some pics would be good. I made my own shackles, thought I would try 6" hole centres instead of the 4" I took off. The new caster angle makes it steer real nice but the 2" extension looks like it might be a bit angry for the front shaft. I was actually trying to get some more room for the slipjoint on the rear shaft. I'll see how it goes. Won't be too much of a prob I think, most of my offroad stuff is done pretty slowly.
|
|
||||
|
The Mil chassis also has a small section cut out in the cross member at the front of the transfer case to stop the drive shaft hitting on articulation . I'll get a pic of that too .
![]()
__________________
Cheers Mick May the south rise again
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Fusion For This Useful Post: | ||
Olive Drab (26th September 2008) | ||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|