Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Shock absorber tech advice needed - SLS vs Coil

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    395
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Shock absorber tech advice needed - SLS vs Coil

    Alright I know that the standard D2 rear shocks are different between the SLS and coil setups due to the obvious difference in characteristics.

    The question I'm posting is..... Does anyone know which of the 2 setups is the stiffer??

    Grimmy has SLS which I've raised about 30mm so the bag effectively has more pressure in it but I need to replace the shocks so am curious is a coil set one will suffice.

    I'm not looking for longer shocks as this will probably over extend the bags $$$$$

    Any thoughts or experiences would be great.....

    Thanks
    Last edited by pohm66; 24th March 2010 at 09:00 AM. Reason: speeling correction
    New :- D3 TDV6 2006 SE
    Bullbar, traxide dual battery
    General grabber ATs
    Mitch hitch
    Home made drawer and fridge system
    Foldable UHF antenna on roof rail

  2. #2
    Tombie Guest
    SLS shocks have higher rebound than Coil.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    395
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Tombie.....

    So if I have the right grasp on physics because I have increased the pressure within the bags, in essence increasing their own rebound I could go for a shock that has less rebound?!?!?!?! eg a standard coil shock...

    Whats you thoughts.......
    New :- D3 TDV6 2006 SE
    Bullbar, traxide dual battery
    General grabber ATs
    Mitch hitch
    Home made drawer and fridge system
    Foldable UHF antenna on roof rail

  4. #4
    Tombie Guest
    You need one slower (heavier) on rebound control.

    Because the bags compression increases its resistance, however the bag tries to extend due to pressure so more control needed on rebound.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    395
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Tombie, so if when you say higher rebound, in your first reply, also means faster then a HD Coil shock should suffice due to it be slower properties.

    I'm really looking for a close-ish fix here.... I'd be a lot more critical if it were the front shocks we were discussing...braking 'n all...

    Cheers....
    New :- D3 TDV6 2006 SE
    Bullbar, traxide dual battery
    General grabber ATs
    Mitch hitch
    Home made drawer and fridge system
    Foldable UHF antenna on roof rail

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,234
    Total Downloaded
    0
    what you require is a shock which allows the airspring to more or less compress at its designed rate but which properly damps the airbag's rebound characteristics.

    LR spent squillions to get the correct compromise...I'd recommend with stock standard OEM replacements or equivalents in well known brands... if the rebound damping is not what you want, then you can get the rebound valving upgraded by 10-20% for about $30/shock by taking them to a shock absorber reconditioner who can adjust them to your requirements.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Port Stephens N.S.W
    Posts
    3,158
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just like to point out ... Microcat shows different rear shockers for pre facelift D2's (prior to VIN 3A) ... for the SLS equiped vehicles, depending on the VIN range, there are 4x different part numbers for rear shocks for these .... but all facelift vehicles from VIN 3A, (coil, ACE or SLS) all appear to use the same shock absorber ... ??

    Why would that be ?

    Kev..
    Kev..

    Going ... going ... almost gone ... GONE !! ... 2004 D2a Td5 Auto "Classic Country" Vienna Green

    2014 MUX LST with fruit
    2015 Kimberley Kamper "Classic"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Koni.

    Then you adjust the rebound to suit your load, speed and driving style.
    The added bonus is you'll probably never have to replace them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    395
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That's an interesting observation Fluids... Makes me also wonder what's different bewteen the 2, if anything, seeing that all other parts seem to be the same so the physics doesn't change!!!

    Microcat...thats the LR parts catalogue as in Land Rover Microcat – November 2009 - Land Rover Technical Blog

    Last edited by pohm66; 25th March 2010 at 01:22 PM. Reason: correction of spelling
    New :- D3 TDV6 2006 SE
    Bullbar, traxide dual battery
    General grabber ATs
    Mitch hitch
    Home made drawer and fridge system
    Foldable UHF antenna on roof rail

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Port Stephens N.S.W
    Posts
    3,158
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Microcat - Yep, that's the one. I'm working with a 2006 version ...

    I don't need shocks yet, and when I do I'll be doing a lift, so this has me somewhat stumped ...

    ... as I read it, from VIN 3A onwards they ALL use the same rear shockers ??

    ... so why the variations before VIN 3A ??

    Anyone ?

    Kev..
    Kev..

    Going ... going ... almost gone ... GONE !! ... 2004 D2a Td5 Auto "Classic Country" Vienna Green

    2014 MUX LST with fruit
    2015 Kimberley Kamper "Classic"

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!