Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: V8 compression test?

  1. #1
    jasper110 Guest

    V8 compression test?

    could someone please tell me what sort of reading (psi) i should be getting on a low compression 3.5 (8.13:1) rover v8 in a 110, on the compression test.

    cheers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    615
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by jasper110
    could someone please tell me what sort of reading (psi) i should be getting on a low compression 3.5 (8.13:1) rover v8 in a 110, on the compression test.

    cheers.
    Haynes Manual for 1970-1992 RR's says 135 lbs/sq in

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,073
    Total Downloaded
    0
    be more concerned that they are all equal---
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    615
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift
    be more concerned that they are all equal---
    Yeah, me too......but the man asked for numbers for a lo-comp 1985 V8.......so I gave him numbers, believing he knew the usual qualifier.

  5. #5
    jasper110 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by byron
    Yeah, me too......but the man asked for numbers for a lo-comp 1985 V8.......so I gave him numbers, believing he knew the usual qualifier.

    you're quite right, i just wanted the numbers. many thanks. would the classic rangie be the same as the 110? i thought that the earliest range rovers still had more power and torque (135bhp/205 lb/f vs. 111bhp/195/lb/f.)

    cheers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    85 110 should have the 9.35:1 motor.

    At least it would've left the factory with that engine.....

    In which case 150 to 170 psi should be about right.

    JC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc
    85 110 should have the 9.35:1 motor.

    At least it would've left the factory with that engine.....

    In which case 150 to 170 psi should be about right.

    JC
    OOOPS, Still thinking OZ here! In the mother country you could get either 8.13 or 9.35 etc in a county....What made me think after the post was Jaspers AVATAR pic, looks european....

    JC

  8. #8
    jasper110 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc
    OOOPS, Still thinking OZ here! In the mother country you could get either 8.13 or 9.35 etc in a county....What made me think after the post was Jaspers AVATAR pic, looks european....

    JC

    yep, u.k. is right, so is the low comp engine.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!