Haynes Manual for 1970-1992 RR's says 135 lbs/sq inOriginally Posted by jasper110
![]()
could someone please tell me what sort of reading (psi) i should be getting on a low compression 3.5 (8.13:1) rover v8 in a 110, on the compression test.
cheers.
Haynes Manual for 1970-1992 RR's says 135 lbs/sq inOriginally Posted by jasper110
![]()
be more concerned that they are all equal---![]()
"How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"
'93 V8 Rossi
'97 to '07. sold.![]()
'01 V8 D2
'06 to 10. written off.
'03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
'10 to '21
'16.5 RRS SDV8
'21 to Infinity and Beyond!
1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
Home is where you park it..
[IMG][/IMG]
Yeah, me too......but the man asked for numbers for a lo-comp 1985 V8.......so I gave him numbers, believing he knew the usual qualifier.Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift
![]()
Originally Posted by byron
you're quite right, i just wanted the numbers. many thanks. would the classic rangie be the same as the 110? i thought that the earliest range rovers still had more power and torque (135bhp/205 lb/f vs. 111bhp/195/lb/f.)
cheers.
85 110 should have the 9.35:1 motor.
At least it would've left the factory with that engine.....
In which case 150 to 170 psi should be about right.
JC
OOOPS, Still thinking OZ here! In the mother country you could get either 8.13 or 9.35 etc in a county....What made me think after the post was Jaspers AVATAR pic, looks european....Originally Posted by justinc
JC
Originally Posted by justinc
yep, u.k. is right, so is the low comp engine.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks