Its good to hear its actually saving you some fuel.
Have you noticed any differences in engine performance?
OK filled the tank today as it is 118.5 today less 4.
Same pump as last time, same amount of cutoffs.
The car took 78.7Litres for 440Kms (odo corrected by 5% for 245.75x16)
Calculates to 17.9L per100Km
Previous 10 tanks approx 22l per100Km
THAT IS 22.9%!!!!!!!!!!
Now I know that one tank does not a summer make and there was 60K of highway work, followed however by climbing the Watagan ridge road.Otherwise a typical driving mix around the Central coast.
This seems just too good to be true, but my experience suggests that I have not made major mistakes in filling etc.
So I will watch and report on future results.
The only thing I can think of is that the Unichip is somehow incorrectly set, and is now overidden by the o2 sensors.
Remember mine is not a standard setup, but from my experience there appears to be benefits in economy from installing o2 sensors, as claimed by the Vic specialist.
Regards Philip A
Its good to hear its actually saving you some fuel.
Have you noticed any differences in engine performance?
97 D1 V8 SE manual - loud & locked - RPI Optimax & some toys
09 D3 HSE
Sold and missed: 03 D2a V8 auto
LROCV member
I love it when a plan comes together!
John "Hannibal" Smith
I guess that its a bit "soggier" on light throttle, but this is good on mine because I have a large throttle body which was very touchy.Have you noticed any differences in engine performance?
The idle lopes a little bit, as I haven't moved the pot on my MAF to the recommended 1.8 volts. I have 4 hole injectors that make it a bit richer at idle, so I do not want to make it too rich.
I think the theory is to make the MAF rich with O2 sensors and they take the fuel out, so it doesn't lean stall.
At first I had a bit of stalling when putting in D when the engine was just warm, but this seems to have gone away, or I haven't duplicated the conditions.
Full Throttle is no different.
SO I am completely happy so far.
Graeme Cooper warned me that on a standard engine, if you lived in hilly country you may not improve consumption, as you have to put your foot down more into the richer part of the fuel curve. But I think that you would gain economy in most circumstances.
Regards Philip A
This is a topic close to my heart as I have a D1 V8 which usually gets about 22l/100 in stop start urban traffic, but on a freeway gets me 14l/100. I'm very interested in getting my urban driving consumption figure down.
The 22l/100 figure you quote, is that urban driving or a bit of highway/bit urban?
Please keep posting as you get more figures.
Urban in avery hilly area,The NSW Central Coast.
I think I would burn the car if it got 22L per100 On the highway.
Regard sPhilip A
That's interesting, Philip.
I wonder if it would work on the P38A. My car doesn't have O2 sensors but the wiring is in place for them. I don't know (Scouse/BigJon/Sniegy?) if the GEMS engine management system can be reprogrammed with TestBook to tell it that O2 sensors are fitted?
I'm fitting one for the LPG SVI system when that's installed.
Ron
Ron B.
VK2OTC
2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
2007 Yamaha XJR1300
Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA
RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever
does a 96 disco have 02 sensors
I do not think so. They are 14CUX same as RRC.does a 96 disco have 02 sensors
Have a look at the exhaust pipes between the muffler and engine. Sensors stick out of each pipe and have wires coming from them. They are the only components with that appearance.
Regards Philip A
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks