IME (and IMHO) retained is preferable, as it will give you more predictable handling, without the lurching and clunking when springs dis- and re- locate.
Dislocating setups may look cool on a ramp, but don't give you much more in usable travel IMHO.
hi all,
quick question... are dislocation cones better than spring retainers ?
when a coil spring is under no weight from the car ie. fully extended and the wheel is still off the ground, will the weight of the wheel and axle housing (for the rear) pull the coil spring down (over extend it) so the wheel touches the ground and gives some traction?
I am thinking of buying some extra long shocks for the back of my D1 and they will have more travel than the 2 inch longer coils so I will have to consider using the spring retainers or fitting dislocation cones on the back..
all in the quest for extra articulation (downwards travel)
any advice appreciated![]()
IME (and IMHO) retained is preferable, as it will give you more predictable handling, without the lurching and clunking when springs dis- and re- locate.
Dislocating setups may look cool on a ramp, but don't give you much more in usable travel IMHO.
Put longer softer springs in to get the same ride height and more down travel, otherwise the cost and effort of the longer shocks is a waste.
Tony
Yes the springs will stretch when retained,more so in a cross axle situation
than say the vehicle supported on a two post hoist.Eric.
Retaining the rear will also force the front suspension to work.
I did a test on my old coiled rear and SUA'd front 100" Landy IIa ute. With the rear unretained I could lift a rear wheel only about 20cm before a spring dislocated and the front did absolutely nothing. Sadly I didn't take pics.
This is what it did after I strapped the rear to retain it.
![]()
![]()
Cheers
Slunnie
~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~
IME (and IMHO) dislocated works just as well!
for my setup i couldnt get the height and rate for the rear coils i wanted with out coil bind to go retained, so i went for the ''****'' factor that seams to work really well in my rig, but not that i know anything i do all my wheeling on the web
cheers phil
I think also that weight and suspension balance (increasing bind) will have a lot to do with it. On my IIa, being unretained did not work in the slightest, but there was a significant weight imbalance between the front and the rear. You jigger may work well unretained because the weight distribution is better than what I had.
Cheers
Slunnie
~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~
I had dislocating springs on the last Rangie but will go retained on "Dancing Hippo". I never had a problem with traction when dislocating but there are 2 problems:
1. They are very noisy with lots of "clanging"
2. They can easily and very quickly upset the balance of the car when you are on very hairy angles.
On a 100in chasis even the 110in they both work well with the rear unretained at the top im in the process of desiging a relocation set up that dosent go in side the coils so i can fit air bags for towing and run a softer rate coil for beta off roading![]()
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks