Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: FC101 - Woods DC Front Driveshaft

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Williamstown, Barossa, SA
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Actually when you calculate tyre circumference per Km against the tyre circumference in the Range Rover donor the CV prop shaft is only running about 3.6 times the speed it would when connected to the RR wheels.

    There are much stronger CVs than Range Rover ones and if dissassembly is a risk nothing would prevent enclosing the CV in a metal cage/shield.
    Pos didn't make myself clear.. With a 101 diff ratio of 5.9:1 (nearly 6 revs of the prop to one of the wheel) as oppose to the Range Rover diff at 3.54:1 (3.5 revs of the prop to 1 rev of the wheel, with the original 101 gearing and the right foot buried to the floor (as it always was with mine!), that poor CV would have been doing nearly 6 times the speed....

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Sitec View Post
    Pos didn't make myself clear.. With a 101 diff ratio of 5.9:1 (nearly 6 revs of the prop to one of the wheel) as oppose to the Range Rover diff at 3.54:1 (3.5 revs of the prop to 1 rev of the wheel, with the original 101 gearing and the right foot buried to the floor (as it always was with mine!), that poor CV would have been doing nearly 6 times the speed....
    I understood exactly what you meant.

    At speed for speed the tyres on a 101 are only turning 80% of the speed of the Range Rover tyres, although my mental arithmetic had several input errors (didn't know the 101 ratio for one), correcting them for the actual diff ratio in the 101 at 5.9:1 the CV prop shaft would still only be turning 4.7 times the Range Rover CVs on the halfshafts.

    If you were running 4.7:1 diffs my calc was almost spot on.

    BTW: The 3.54:1 diff ratio on the RRc plays no part in the calculation because the CVs turn the same RPM as the wheels.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    The other factor is that a RRc is more than capable of running all day at 140KPH. (That was my standard speed between Sydney and Melbourne back in the 1980's.)

    When you consider the RRc CVs at that speed (1.01K RPM) and the probable V-Max (110 KPH) of the 101 on standard diffs the 101 prop shaft is turning 3.68K RPM (2.92K RPM on 4.7:1 diffs)

    Still very fast, but possible on the correct CV with appropriate lubrication.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Williamstown, Barossa, SA
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Fair enough. Still fff fast in my opinion! Guess usin old CV's and home made props I was never game enough to really go for it as I've had props part company with vehicles before!!!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Yes very fast indeed, but if an appropriate CV can be found its worthy of a trial.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    101 landrover factory diff ratio is 5.57 to one.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by 101 Ron View Post
    101 landrover factory diff ratio is 5.57 to one.
    Hmmm thats what I punched in the first time!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!