Page 3 of 22 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 218

Thread: Brute's 101

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brute View Post
    Tight fit it certainly is, the LH manifold is all but touching the chassis rail, the RH has an inch or so. I might have to mess around with the mounts and lift it a tad to stop it knocking.
    I would have a long hard think about how to address that issue. The front driveshaft already operates outside design parameters and ideally the engine/gearbox should sit a bit lower in the chassis to get the driveshaft angles a bit better - so whatever you decide aim for this ideal position - may not be possible but something to keep in mind.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Parkerville WA
    Posts
    553
    Total Downloaded
    0
    LH manifold
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,180
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nice purchase Ian! I'll race you to get it finished

    Was this the 101 alluded to in the W4 2013 Challenge thread?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Parkerville WA
    Posts
    553
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stuee View Post
    Nice purchase Ian! I'll race you to get it finished

    Was this the 101 alluded to in the W4 2013 Challenge thread?

    This is the one Stuee. I think your deadline beats mine

    It would be nice to get them both at the W4 Challenge next year though.

    Where abouts are you I wouldn't mind having a look at yours

    Cheers

    ian

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,180
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brute View Post
    This is the one Stuee. I think your deadline beats mine

    It would be nice to get them both at the W4 Challenge next year though.

    Where abouts are you I wouldn't mind having a look at yours

    Cheers

    ian
    I'm in Dianella. I work in Kwinana though so can really only do weekends. I have to go down south for a wedding this weekend so if your keen ping through a PM next week and we can sort something out.

    I'm dead keen to get mine out and about once its running, really difficult not having a 4wd after having sold the disco.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Scotland
    Posts
    475
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brute View Post
    Tight fit it certainly is, the LH manifold is all but touching the chassis rail, the RH has an inch or so. I might have to mess around with the mounts and lift it a tad to stop it knocking.
    If you're messing round with the mounts would it be worth considering some different rubbers and try to make use of the gap on the drivers side?
    Thinner block on the drivers side, and either a thicker one or shims on the passenger side?

    There's at least 2 others with the GM V8 diesel in em (one in the UK, one in Holland) although both run auto boxes which will make a difference to prop angles anyways.

    This is the Dutch one, rather tight in there Clicky

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Parkerville WA
    Posts
    553
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DasLandRoverMan View Post
    If you're messing round with the mounts would it be worth considering some different rubbers and try to make use of the gap on the drivers side?
    Thinner block on the drivers side, and either a thicker one or shims on the passenger side?

    There's at least 2 others with the GM V8 diesel in em (one in the UK, one in Holland) although both run auto boxes which will make a difference to prop angles anyways.

    This is the Dutch one, rather tight in there Clicky
    I was going to look at doing that as the engine doesn't look to run quite true to the chassis to me so I reckon I could get more c learance without lifting it at all just push the front across 20 or 30 mm

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Parkerville WA
    Posts
    553
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If they have used the ZF 4 HP 20 auto and LT 230 transfer case the prop angles should be the same as the LT 95 4 speed manual.

    I have an auto kicking around but. Haven't decided whether I want to keep the pto winch or not

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Scotland
    Posts
    475
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Having done an auto into a 101 I can tell you the prop angles are different if the engine stays in the same place, the auto box is about 8 inches longer than the 101 LT95.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Parkerville WA
    Posts
    553
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DasLandRoverMan View Post
    Having done an auto into a 101 I can tell you the prop angles are different if the engine stays in the same place, the auto box is about 8 inches longer than the 101 LT95.
    That's heaps, does that make things better or worse? Front better, rear worse I assume.

    I was just going by rangy experience, but the 101 LT95 has a different Bell housing to the rangy I believe.

    So much to learn, gonna have to ignore years and years of Landy experience and start all over again. The 101 is so unique ( apart from the dodgy wiring and oil leaks)

Page 3 of 22 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!