The prototype I think no 7 which came to Aust for the army to try was fitted in England with a local falcon three litre motor in stead of the rover three litre of the earlier prototypes.
I under stand the the early prototypes had a series transmission and could only drive the trailer whisle in low range.
The Aust army liked the Falcon engined prototype,but Landrover wouldnt supply any more with the local engine.
That Aust army prototype was extensively reworked and fitted with a 350 chev motor when sold off.
I have a old 4x4 Australia mag with a article of this vehicle being used with the powered trailer set up as a off road touring bus set up.
The mag writer drive the vehicle and was impressed,but said the thing was a problem to turn around on a tight track.
The range rover and 101 was designed with each other in mind and is why the range rover can be easy converted to 6x6 as the transfercase is designed for the extra output drive ( originally for a power driven trailer) and this works in high range too unlike the early series rovers powered trailer experiments.
I would expect the very early 101 prototypes with 3 lt 6 cyl rover motor was like the FCs of the time,but with the strip down body and short lenght required by the British army.
The army found they very badly lacked the power required to tow the new gun coming into service and was going to to buy else where.
The new V8 solved the power problem and the new constant 4WD transmission spread the drive over the two axles allowing the lighter Salisbury axles to be used instead of the ENV.
The Salisbury axles still needed extensive mods to do the job .




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks