
Originally Posted by
disco2hse
Then it is moot.
Not really - look at any dictionary.
Actually you will find intentional damages are normally covered. Ask anyone who has been keyed and had the damage repaired and paid for. However you will also be lumped with the excess because the insurer cannot get it from anyone else. On the other hand if someone deliberately drives into you in a carpark and you can identify them the insurer will chase them for the excess.
Yes, maybe I was not clear - I meant pretty much what you have said!
Yes. Which is why sometimes we argue with insurers about their decisions.
One of my pet hates is ascribing events to single causes when it is almost always not the case.
But we don't want to say that do we. Then the insurer can say it is design flaw and the cost of any damage needs to be obtained by the driver from the manufacturer.
No, we don't want to!
Yes, which is why I compared the two scenarios. You need to be able to point to a specific incident not a duration of combined events that contributed to wear.
Yes, you need a specific event for an insurance claim.
One thing worth noting is that a metallurgical examination of the fracture is likely to reveal whether it was from a single event or from fatigue (which would be the result of driving over corrugations, for example). I have been there to determine whether a failed drag link on a Landcruiser happened in the caccident or was a major factor the accident. (Answer was it happened when the vehicle hit the post at the side of the grid when the company driver lost control on corrugations - he lost steering because he was driving too fast for the conditions, not because the steering failed!)
I have been unimpressed by most of the tray mounting systems I have seen on Landrovers and, indeed, many other four wheel drives, particularly the way in which weight is carried only at each end of the tray. The original body on the Landrover chassis, while only attached front and rear, carried weight at several intermediate points, minimising the bending moment on the chassis.
It may be worth mentioning that the traditional method of mounting flat trays on chassis was to have a full length wooden spacer that fitted both the tray bearers (usually flat) and the chassis - contoured to fit in the case of Landrovers and other light vehicles. This spread the weight, although it did encourage rust between the wood and the chassis.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks