Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 75

Thread: what is the better option 33's or 35's

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,681
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Seems to me it depends where the majority of your use will be.

    35s are heavier. That's extra unsprung weight that makes trail work slower. And the 35s need more pressure adjustment to get a decent ride on trails. There's no need for 35s as a touring tyre.

    But you will essentially unstoppable in sand.

    33s are a better all-round tyre. But for sand a tall & skinny 255/85 33" will go better than the 285/75 shape you're heading towards. On the other hand 255/85s are an uncommon size. 285/75s you can get more easily in the bush, with a better choice of patterns.

    And I think radial claws have been left behind too.

    Regards
    Max P

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    255/85 is the way to go IMO.

    33 inch, but skinny enough to keep your turning circle and be better in mud, sand, less aqua planing, less stress on steering components etc.. then again, lets not get into a fat vs skinny argument



    I run 255/85 BFG Km/2 (like many on the site) and I'm very very happy with them.

    No lift, Disco rims w/ 20mm offset mod. No rubbing at full lock, or full articulation.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tusker View Post

    35s are heavier. That's extra unsprung weight that makes trail work slower. And the 35s need more pressure adjustment to get a decent ride on trails.
    I'm not totally sure on that. My 35's have a stupidly good ride at low pressure.... I can go miles faster on rough trails on them than I can on my 255/85's..... stuff just disappears into them!

    However they as you say are massively heavy, and the car works very hard to turn them at any sort of speed.

    The car actually runs a few degrees hotter engine temp according to my digital gauge thing when on the big tyres.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prospect SA
    Posts
    2,131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by zeus11 View Post
    Thanks for the replies.

    The defender is an 02 with sals and is chipped with exhaust and intercooler upgrades.

    33's appear the logical choice............ though you dont sell a current shape hilux to buy a defender for logical reasons
    Thats funny. One of our contractors(concreter) has just done very same thing.
    He now drives a blue 03 extreme and loves it.

    He just put on some road tyres though as his muddies did not pull up at the lights with trailer on back. They had no grip in the wet on the road so be careful.

    They are probably only suited for off road and in traffic they are just O.K.
    Car looks wicked, may try and take a pick and post it if he comes back for a patch up here.
    He is not a forum kind of guy, I tried to get him to join.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,681
    Total Downloaded
    0
    snip

    Quote Originally Posted by Psimpson7 View Post
    My 35's have a stupidly good ride at low pressure.... I can go miles faster on rough trails on them than I can on my 255/85's..... stuff just disappears into them!
    end snip

    Yep that's what I meant. You have to drop the pressures to get a decent ride.

    Regards
    Max P

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    44
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmmmm see now I'm undecided again.

    So who makes a good 34 x 12.5 tyre?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mudgeeraba GC
    Posts
    478
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm picking up some 255/85 bighorns on 0 offset rims later today for my county. I can't wait to see how they look and how they go in the mud on the weekend. I don't think the isuzu will be concerned about the extra diametre...

    As far as legalities, insurance will only wipe you if the illegal mod / unroadworthy item has contributed to the accident. Spinning out in the wet with a blown tail light doesn't mean they won't pay up. However, the larger tyre size will affect braking distance and possibly handling, so if you run up the rear of someone, the larger tyres may be considered a contributing factor.

    I'll be keeping my 235/85's as the daily tyre and swap for the mud. Highway terrain tyres should get quite good mileage

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Medowie, NSW
    Posts
    34
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Everything is a compromise. I reckon go the 33', you have seen my defender.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    44
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah your defender looks great Sav.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by big guy View Post
    [snip]

    He just put on some road tyres though as his muddies did not pull up at the lights with trailer on back. They had no grip in the wet on the road so be careful.

    [snip]
    Depends very much on compounding, case construction and the age of the tyre.

    I've found BFG MT KO's and now Maxxis 762's to be fine in the wet, which is more than can be said for the Bridgestone MT's I ran for several years. They were drift city on any corner or curve.

    Oh, and contrary to popular opinion increased tyre pressure rather than reduced is better in the wet, crossply or radial construction.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!