Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53

Thread: What is actual wheelbase of 110"?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    About 40 years ago (or maybe more), I read a road test of some sort of Jeep imported from America. The road tester complained bitterly that the Jeep was almost impossible to keep on the road because although it was RHD, it was set up to cope with the camber of the road when driven on the right hand side of the road.

    I'm not sure whether this is related in any way to the topic that this thread has drifted onto or whether it is just an interesting piece of trivia. I'm hoping someone will explain if it is relevant.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by vnx205 View Post
    About 40 years ago (or maybe more), I read a road test of some sort of Jeep imported from America. The road tester complained bitterly that the Jeep was almost impossible to keep on the road because although it was RHD, it was set up to cope with the camber of the road when driven on the right hand side of the road.
    ...
    Mack and Kenworth trucks had similar problems, the front beam axles were set for LHD operation and on RHD cambered Australian roads they used to scrub out tyres on one side. There was a roaring trade done by a truck alignment centre at Narrellan NSW where they used to bend the axle to correct the camber.

    Not sure it would account for RVR110's MY11 Defender which is 109 1/4" wheelbase on the LHS and 110 1/8" wheelbase on the RHS though. (addit: It may be a stupid question but were the wheels straight ahead, not turned slightly left? Perhaps an average of measurements with the wheels turned each way are needed.)

    Were still waiting for the Land Rover Engineer to explain the issue for us!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post

    Not sure it would account for RVR110's MY11 Defender which is 109 1/4" wheelbase on the LHS and 110 1/8" wheelbase on the RHS though.

    Were still waiting for the Land Rover Engineer to explain the issue for us!
    Oh goody is a LandRover engineer coming on here to answer our criticisms of his handiwork?He'll need a tough hide to withstand all the brickbats that I would like to throw at him.
    wagoo.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wagoo View Post
    Oh goody is a LandRover engineer coming on here to answer our critisisms of his handiwork?He'll need a tough hide to withstand all the brickbats that I would like to throw at him.
    wagoo.
    between you and me I doubt he will live long enough to answer them all

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wagoo View Post
    If a Landrover has a natural tendency to wander to the RHS of the road and everything including wheel alignment is in good order, then swivel balls with slotted bolt holes, originally developed to correct castor angle on vehicles with lifted suspensions can also be used to compensate for road camber that is designed into Australian roads.
    When I built my Dana/Salisbury front axle assy way back when, I gave the RHS(drivers side) 4 degrees castor and the left side the standard 3 degrees.
    Did i do it ar$e about? The truck tracked pretty well though, particularly once I removed both Detroit Lockers. But that comment is probably more relevant to the Detroit locker thread elsewhere
    Wagoo.
    Yep, I'd just use slotted swivels to achieve it and IMO the greater castor needs to be on the LHS wheel.
    It's what i was going to do anyway but I'm just too lazy

    (castor increases the steering's self centreing action, as well as increasing camber in turns, ie. the more the wheel turns negative camber increases. We used to use up to 9* on race cars, if a driver could cope with the weight of the steering )

    Interestingly Patrols have the same problem and the fix is an eccentric castor bush in the LHS top swivel bearing to bring camber back to about 0* (they run positive camber ) and increase the castor.
    It helped our Patrol immensely and also pretty much eliminated front tyre scuffing.
    I reckon it needs a touch more but I always came from the school of thought if a little is a good a bucket load is better

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wagoo View Post
    Oh goody is a LandRover engineer coming on here to answer our criticisms of his handiwork?He'll need a tough hide to withstand all the brickbats that I would like to throw at him.
    wagoo.
    A bloke came on here a few years back asking for feedback.

    It was ascertained he was genuine so we all joined in.

    We all threw so much crap at him, in the nicest possible way, concerning all our perceived engineering shortcomings I don't think the poor fella came back

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CROMER, NSW
    Posts
    2,048
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the wheel base of the 110 is longer than the old 109's. i saw a 200tdi that had been made into a truck cab like mine, but he'd used a series 3 body, you could see the rear wheels were not central in the rear guards, looked a bit dicky!
    LAND ROVER;
    HELPING PUT OIL BACK IN THE GROUND FOR 70 YEARS
    CARS DON'T GET ANY "GREENER" THAT.

  8. #38
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,512
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by barney View Post
    the wheel base of the 110 is longer than the old 109's. i saw a 200tdi that had been made into a truck cab like mine, but he'd used a series 3 body, you could see the rear wheels were not central in the rear guards, looked a bit dicky!
    Not only is the wheelbase longer, but both front and rear axles are further back compared to the Series Landrovers.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by barney View Post
    the wheel base of the 110 is longer than the old 109's. i saw a 200tdi that had been made into a truck cab like mine, but he'd used a series 3 body, you could see the rear wheels were not central in the rear guards, looked a bit dicky!
    Series II/III landies have the rear wheel too far forward in the rear guard. I have always thought they should either have a 1" longer wheelbase, or the rear guard cutout moved forward.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Whoa!! Just went out to measure my 2007 110, and it is way longer on the drivers side:

    Drivers side: 110.5"
    Passenger side: 109.0"

    That is 1.5" difference

    Edit: Sitting on a level concrete pad, wheels straight ahead...
    Last edited by spudboy; 13th January 2011 at 11:15 AM. Reason: More info

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!