Originally Posted by
zkdaz
For me better would be axle housings strong enough never to worry about bending them when bouncing fully loaded vehicle up a steep and badly rutted track.
After that priorities come down to track width, CW&P ratios for 9R16 tyres, lockers, half shaft strength, disc brakes and stud patterns. Ideally I would prefer front and rear axles to share as many components as possible. Lastly I would prefer axles from a common vehicle rather than exotic or custom, both for cost and parts availability.
As I see it, the problem is vehicles designed for greater GVM have significantly wider track than a 110. This leaves us with 3 land rover flavors (rover, p38, sals), Nissan and Toyota, none of which are ideal.
John, have you managed to get your hybrid/LC105 axles registered?
Cheers
Dan