35 K is one expensive TD5 Defender
So, I'm considering late td5 (i.e. $35k ish) vs. early Puma (i.e. $40K+ ish) for my first defender and my young family... I drove both yesterday, back to back. Well, I drove a new Puma at the dealership as this was all I had at my disposal - I presume the difference between early and new Pumas is not huge (?).
2006 td5 came first, this car i'd had my eye on for a short while was low km and had some extras I wanted but turned out not to be the best example i think (had been a little negelected). Still, driving was good fun - felt suitably rugged and truck-like. Performance was nothing to get excited about, but it did the job and would cruise comfortably at speed (once it got there). Gbox was reasuringly mechanical and clunky, interior was fine by my standards. Aircon I had cranked the whole drive... on a 25deg it managed to keep me (and my legs) comfortable... on a 40deg WA summers day i think my young passengers faces would still melt. Rear seats were basic which i liked, as they folded up neatly and created a lot of load space.
So, to the dealership, and a $55K plain-white 110, vanilla flavour with no sprinkles on top (basic). Difficult to fall in love with.
Wow what a difference. A meaningful one as well... Drive was a LOT more refined, gearbox smooth, interior was pleasing, steering wheel lower with a more car-like driving stance, engine much perkier. Aircon seemed OK, if a little meagre. Rear seats and load space from the td5 i prefered... Puma rear seats seem a little further back?
OK, so this is a 2012 model, but same experience as a 2008 model i presume...?
Overall it left me feeling that with 35k to spend, i'd find another 5-8k and get a Puma even if i had to wait a little while to buy some fruit. I would consider an older, less expensive example of the td5 if I could find one that had been well cared for... but wouldnt spend as much as 35k and it just isnt worth it when this puts you in reach of the Puma.
Fair?


Reply With Quote


Howdy,
Bookmarks