Just wondering what fuel economy people are getting out of there 2.2 pumas ?
I feel as though on an average the 2.2 is worse on fuel than the 2.4.
With my 2.4 I never ran out of fuel even after driving on the fuel light for a long time whereas in the 2.2 the fuel light comes on and then the a short time later I find myself completely out of fuel and sitting on side of the road

this however is not an accurate measurement of course...on a recent trip out west I was getting up around 17.5L per 100km that's with a box trailer with 350kg in it,3people and 4 dogs but I do have 285/75/16's so I am considering going to 265/75/16's next see what happens...it often makes me wonder why I didn't buy a v8 duel cab toyota for a smoother ride and more power for I'd say around the same fuel economy.
Bookmarks