I guess they would be hard pressed to suffer from range anxiety in Tasmania. Tasmania actually has a strong case to take the lead on this.
Printable View
Well the excise may be one thing, but what I want to know is what fuel is going to be used in all the aircraft presently grounded?
Or are they all going to parked at Alice Springs and later stripped and melted down to make EV cars?
And that is just the ones that burn kero. What about GA that runs on petrol? I don't think that my old R22 helicopter can be converted to electric!
With solid battery's likely to give you twice the range and half the weight of existing Lithium ion batteries I suspect sub two years and we all may change our minds. VW has tipped more than 300million in to a company with solid state tech, Bill gates also tossed a bucket load at over the last ten years. [biggrin]
Rivian 450km is followed with a A 400-mile (640km) battery pack for the R1T will be available in January 2022. Change the battery tech in the Revian from Lithium ion to the solid state batteries and range is possibly closer to 1000km. Add in the solid state tech does not have the charging ROAD BLOCKS of the current lithium ion and likely charge times of sub 15 minutes. I am keener on hydrogen refilling times but must admit the samsung and QuantumScape tech almost makes hydrogen unnecessary for almost all smaller trucks and vehicles. Total elimination of the fire risk from Lithium Ion as a big plus in my thoughts make that tech safer than both ICE and Lithium ion tech [thumbsupbig] Suspect Toyota and others are chasing this hard as well. Added a chat in a video about their race as well.
It is always almost here of course[biggrin] In a few weeks I think QuantumScape might make me smile a bit more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAFk-CebHWA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76zkKKspWP4
It's not my mind to change, but my companies - they won't spend more than they need to on a vehicle, so they aren't going to go drop 2 or 3 times the money on an EV for me unfortunately.
And charge time makes no difference to a work vehicle for me as I can't run a lead to it at home so not sure how I could charge it and a 15 minute charge on a battery bank that big would require a very large mains supply so even service stations and car parks aren't going to put in many chargers that draw 100's of amps from the mains. Infrastructure for the vehicles is still one of the biggest hurdles IMO, but I’m pretty sure an EV would make sense as a main run around once we are retired.
Fully agree with your company on spending and costs. The issue is cost. With Ford advertising running cost 40% lower for its EV van I suspect a lot of business will take notice very quickly. Fuel and maintenance cost savings are a game changer and will be the main reason for changes to EV or FCEV for larger longer range and always ready needs. Japan today just might give a little more on the Hydrogen Side.
This thread is starting to remind me of the "Peak Oil" thread back in was it 2007?
Petrol was going to be over $2 per litre by now.
Inflation corrected is it under $1 at present.
Regards PhilipAQuote:
As Mark Twain said, it is difficult to make predictions, particularly about the future. ... The first is President Eisenhower's truistic observation that “the future lies before us”; the second has been variously attributed to Mark Twain and Yogi Berra: “It is dangerous to make forecasts, especially about the future.”
Fuel excise isn't difficult. They will just put a levy on Chargefox accounts.
That's ME[biggrin] Looking at doubling my PV at work. Might move the work one to home dobling up here for a EV likely needed inside a year now as my 2005 Lexus is looking shaky now.
Who has or has driven in a truck tractor or mining style beast powered by a Cummings engine? They are almost slow movers in the area[biggrin]
Cummins powers on with hydrogen technology strategy – Prime Mover Magazine