
Originally Posted by
DiscoDB
I think it was back around when the posts were still in the double digits 6 years ago that the misinformation started to first appear.
Doesn’t matter what I agree with, but every claim has been made repeatedly, argued with facts, sometimes with unproven myths, but always over and over. Neither side is going to acknowledge the other point of view.
But when I see two members squabbling and point scoring - the facts are irrelevant. This is not a healthy discussion.
Take a leaf out of NavyDivers book. He presents information of interest, back by his real usage experience, and if people throw barbs at his choice of vehicle he ignores and moves on.
So the misinformation is what you don't agree with. Fair enough. I've never disagreed with anything that is correct that has been posted. You will always find I agree with facts that are correct, even if I disagree with the outcomes of the facts (eg: how much C02 is generated by burning petrol ... its true ... but that doesn't mean the world is ending).
seeya
Shane L.
Proper cars--
'92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
'85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
'63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
'72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
Modern Junk:
'07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
'11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual
Bookmarks