View Full Version : UHF antenna rating dBi
Utemad
28th September 2010, 08:13 PM
Hi folks
What is with UHF antenna ratings going from dB to dBi?
It looks like a 4.5dB antenna is now rated at 6.6dBi.
I googled and found no explanation. Just everyone has changed over to the different rating system.
Thanks
waynep
29th September 2010, 01:49 PM
Recalling my 30 year ago radio theory but here goes.
I'm pretty sure "dBi" refers to dB gain over an isotropic antenna, which is a theoretical antenna with zero gain. You can't make an isotropic antenna.
The other way to reference gain is to a standard half wave dipole antenna which has about 2.2dB gain over an isotropic (again only theoretical ). This "dBd" measurement is more practical because a dipole antenna can actually be built and other antennas tested against it as a reference. A quarter wave ground plane antenna looks electrically like a half wave dipole.
If you Google isotropic antenna you will get more on the theory.
slug_burner
29th September 2010, 07:57 PM
your 30 year recollection has stood the test of time.
db is a ratio (power ratio) dbi is a ratio with respect to an isotropic antenna.
an isotropic antenna is theoretical and it sends power out in all directions evenly spread. A bit like the energy that is radiated away from the sun, just as much out the sides as out the top, you get the picture
Utemad
29th September 2010, 10:27 PM
So why would they change the rating for consumer antennas across the board?
I think it is weird not even GME mention the change on their website.
miky
30th September 2010, 07:07 AM
Read what is said above!
If dBi is 2.2dB "more" than using dB over a dipole they get a bigger number.
Bigger the number means it must be better, yes? Actually no it doesn't of course, they are just using a different reference point.
.
Hoges
3rd October 2010, 04:50 PM
Read what is said above!
If dBi is 2.2dB "more" than using dB over a dipole they get a bigger number.
Bigger the number means it must be better, yes? Actually no it doesn't of course, they are just using a different reference point.
.
quite correct...to get a bigger number 'cause size counts:wasntme:
Utemad
3rd October 2010, 05:32 PM
This came up for pretty much that reason. A friend of mine who lives in outback Qld was buying a UHF and antenna. He wanted a 6db as there is nothing resembling a hill for hundreds of kms from where he lives.
The ARB guy said that this is the one he needs as he shows him a 2ft or so 6.6dBi antenna.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.