View Full Version : Is there an interest in a Land Rover Wiki...???
Hebe
26th October 2010, 01:45 PM
Hi,
A forum is of course great. And this is the best one yet for Australia and maybe even the world.
However, a forum has a few short comings:
Useful information gets lost in long threads where the subject may change or gets sidetracked.
No clear overview of topics and some useful information can be hidden in several threads.
Stickys help, but still lack some of the clearcut information people are looking for.
The answer to have clear "How To", "Reference" and "Historical Data" easily and clearly available is maybe starting a Land Rover Wiki. I heard this idea and sentiment from some others (off and online). However, I do not have as much time as a year ago and would first would like to know if
A) there are enough interested people wanting a Land Rover Wiki
and
B) if there is someone out there who wants to help maintaining this?
If the answer is yes I can host a Wiki on one of my websites... such as landroverseries.org (http://www.landroverseries.org)
Looking forward to some feedback...
Kris
drifter
26th October 2010, 03:02 PM
*shrugs*
I just use the search function when I need to see if it has already been answered.
incisor
26th October 2010, 03:06 PM
i can soon turn the wiki side of the software on..
tried it when it first came out but it died of disinterest :eek:
slug_burner
26th October 2010, 05:51 PM
Perhaps my ability to perform searches is not up with the best but I have had difficulty finding threads I recall seeing little less stuff that is before my time or I did not participate in. I would therefore support the development of a web based site allowing navigation to the articles of interst via hot links. If that is a wiki then go for it.
If this forum has the facility that you speak of Hebe I would advocate for the wiki to be hosted here as this is where the knowledge is going to come from.
Although I don't have buckets of time, if I did I would have restored my first series one by now. I would be willing to give some time to develope and maintain such a resource. Although computer literate I would not label myself as a computer guru.
Scallops
26th October 2010, 07:02 PM
I've personally always found the info I need right here online. That - and great people who actually come around here and help, as was your experience too, Kris.
Narangga
26th October 2010, 07:09 PM
i can soon turn the wiki side of the software on..
tried it when it first came out but it died of disinterest :eek:
Wonder if that is because a Wiki and a Land Rover have one thing in common - they leak. :p
Scallops
26th October 2010, 07:37 PM
Wonder if that is because a Wiki and a Land Rover have one thing in common - they leak. :p
:lol2:
Hebe
26th October 2010, 08:35 PM
i can soon turn the wiki side of the software on..
tried it when it first came out but it died of disinterest :eek:
Hi,
Indeed most reactions so far do not sound that interested. If you can/consider putting a Wiki engine on Aulro that would be great of course. Maybe do a Poll on all users and see if there is interest?
And indeed I experience again and again the great help others give through the forum and meeting up.
However, some of you do seem to get tired answering the same questions over and over again. I suspect that some get tired this way and start to ignore some topics and requests for info. A good Wiki could keep the data concentrated and relief the forum of repeats. Thus giving more opportunity for more interaction and discussing things normally not found on a Wiki. Which later could be cleaned up and added.
But then again.... we can also reason that the less questions on the forum the less interaction.....
I am OK with how it is. But I do see some benefits in a Wiki and heard the suggestion thrice in the last week alone. But this would only work if there would be sufficient interest and participation.
Kris
pop058
26th October 2010, 08:47 PM
OK, I can't hold out any longer.
WTF is a WIKI :confused:
slug_burner
26th October 2010, 08:53 PM
wiki as in wikipedia. a web page that can be added to by editors that have a contribution to make on a topic
or
The note below is taken from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:A…
Wikipedia (pronounced /ˌwiːkiˈpiːdiə/ or /ˌwɪkiˈpiːdiə/) is a multilingual, Web-based, free content encyclopedia project. The name Wikipedia is a portmanteau (combination of words and their meanings) of the words wiki (a type of collaborative Web site) and encyclopedia. Wikipedia's articles provide links to guide the user to related pages with additional information.
Wikipedia is written collaboratively by volunteers from all around the world. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference Web sites, attracting at least 684 million visitors yearly by 2008. There are more than 75,000 active contributors working on more than 10,000,000 articles in more than 250 languages. As of today, there are 2,468,565 articles in English; every day hundreds of thousands of visitors from around the world make tens of thousands of edits and create thousands of new articles to enhance the knowledge held by the Wikipedia encyclopedia. (See also: Wikipedia:Statistics).
Visitors do not need specialized qualifications to contribute, since their primary role is to write articles that cover existing knowledge; this means that people of all ages and cultural and social backgrounds can write Wikipedia articles. Most of the articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet, simply by clicking the edit this page link. Anyone is welcome to add information, cross-references or citations, as long as they do so within Wikipedia's editing policies and to an appropriate standard. Substandard or disputed information is subject to removal. Users need not worry about accidentally damaging Wikipedia when adding or improving information, as other editors are always around to advise or correct obvious errors, and Wikipedia's software is carefully designed to allow easy reversal of editorial mistakes.
Because Wikipedia is an ongoing work to which, in principle, anybody can contribute, it differs from a paper-based reference source in important ways. In particular, older articles tend to be more comprehensive and balanced, while newer articles more frequently contain significant misinformation, unencyclopedic content, or vandalism. Users need to be aware of this to obtain valid information and avoid misinformation that has been recently added and not yet removed (see Researching with Wikipedia for more details). However, unlike a paper reference source, Wikipedia is continually updated, with the creation or updating of articles on topical events within seconds, minutes or hours, rather than months or years for printed encyclopedias.
If you have not done so, we invite you to take a few moments to read What Wikipedia is (and is not), so that you have an understanding of how to consult or contribute to Wikipedia. Further information on key topics appears below. If you cannot find what you are looking for, try the Frequently asked questions, advice for parents, or see Where to ask questions. For help with editing and other issues, see Help:Contents.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:A…
dreamin'
26th October 2010, 09:01 PM
I'd give it a try - what do we have to do?
chazza
26th October 2010, 09:59 PM
Sounds like a good idea to me; however; when something that is published is wrong, who corrects it and what is to say that the correction is correct?
I can think of three occasions when I have found absurd errors on Wikepedia and several times noted errors by learned colleagues on various forums I visit.
I am at the point now where I treat most of what I read on the net with a grain of salt until the need for salt is proved to be superfluous,
Cheers Charlie
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.