PDA

View Full Version : dihydrogen monoxide -intake threat in areas with water increase in vicinity



digger
1st April 2011, 08:27 AM
Guys, I have just been made aware in the last week of a new threat especially to places like here in the riverland (and I suppose also in qld, nsw etc after the floods ) of a new threat to be aware of. With the increase in water theres a massive increase of "Dihydrogen Monoxide" in the area...

I would try to explain it but Im afraid my attempts would just be a watered down attempt at giving the full impact... sufficient to say if you inhale too much of this Dihydrogen Monoxide it can be fatal!

There is a website Ive found that gives good advice and covers most of the FAQ...... I suggest if you are anywhere that has had an increase of water recently that you read this! (so s/w WA is probably exempt!)

Dihydrogen Monoxide Research Division - dihydrogen monoxide info
http://www.dhmo.org/

this is the US site but as I said quite comprehensive


cheers
digger
__________________

isuzurover
1st April 2011, 08:30 AM
lol - not this one again.

I once put an MSDS for dihydrogen monoxide on the door of my lab (where all the other MSDSs needed to be posted) as a joke - mainly to see how long it would be before someone actually noticed...

p38arover
1st April 2011, 08:33 AM
I avoid it unless it has been detoxified with hops and yeast.

kaa45
1st April 2011, 08:35 AM
Inhaling too much H2O is definitely dangerous to your health...:D

Shouldn't drink it either....you know what fish do in it

THE BOOGER
1st April 2011, 08:38 AM
We need a special area for threads started today:D

isuzutoo-eh
1st April 2011, 08:44 AM
I wanted to vote for MAYBE -I WANT MORE INFO, but with all the capitals it felt like I was shouting. It wasn't a strong enough sentence to shout, so I had to go for another option, I took the monosyllabic option.

Quarks
1st April 2011, 08:50 AM
I was going to donate to dihydrogen monoxide research, to find out more, but had second thoughts when I heard it might be just a slush fund?? :p:p

clubagreenie
1st April 2011, 08:50 AM
Ban it now,. All rehydration media should be disinfected by the introduction of alcohol into the mixture. Then drip infused while relaxed back on a beach while beeing fanned by large breasted wenches feeding us grapes while we shout at the "ordinary people" to hurry up and finish work on the Land Rover.

rockyroad
1st April 2011, 09:30 AM
Why is Bob Brown so quiet on this issue!!

Ferret
1st April 2011, 11:24 AM
Why is Bob Brown so quiet on this issue!!

Does he even understand it?

tracker
1st April 2011, 12:57 PM
looked outside,the dam stuff is every where at the moment.
Better mow the grass tomorrow,it may be safe then:o

tracker
1st April 2011, 01:12 PM
Facts About Dihydrogen Monoxide (http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html)

Quite interesting.I like the part about the dangers of dhmo.Might forward to bob whatshisname.:D

digger
1st April 2011, 08:03 PM
OK But nothing stated in the original post was a lie was it?

I think snopes has something about this particular MSDS as well!



Happy april fools day


Bob Brown is out running the country apparently?

ramblingboy42
1st April 2011, 08:42 PM
Why am I the only one has voted for more info.....huh????????

digger
1st April 2011, 08:51 PM
Why am I the only one has voted for more info.....huh????????

snopes.com: Dihydrogen Monoxide (http://www.snopes.com/science/dhmo.asp)

and


the whole wikipedia entry!

Dihydrogen monoxide hoax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to:

"Dihydrogen monoxide" redirects here. For the H2O molecule, see Properties of water.

Water consists of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.The dihydrogen monoxide hoax is a deception that involves the use of an unfamiliar name for water ("dihydrogen monoxide"), then, by listing some negative effects of this chemical, attempts to convince people that it should be carefully regulated, labeled as hazardous, or banned. The hoax is designed to illustrate how the lack of scientific literacy and an exaggerated analysis can lead to misplaced fears.[1] "Dihydrogen monoxide", shortened to "DHMO", is a name for water that is consistent with basic rules of chemical nomenclature,[2] but is not among the names published by IUPAC[3] and is almost never used.

A popular version of the hoax was created by Eric Lechner, Lars Norpchen and Matthew Kaufman, housemates while attending University of California, Santa Cruz in 1990,[4] revised by Craig Jackson (also a UC Santa Cruz student) in 1994,[5] and brought to widespread public attention in 1997 when Nathan Zohner, a 14-year-old student, gathered petitions to ban "DHMO" as the basis of his science project, titled "How Gullible Are We?".[6]

"Dihydrogen monoxide" may sound dangerous to those with a limited knowledge of chemistry or who hold to an ideal of a "chemical-free" life (chemophobia).[6] The only familiar common usage of the term "monoxide" is in the highly toxic gas "carbon monoxide", and the simplified term "monoxide poisoning" is commonly used to refer to poisoning by this colorless and odorless substance.[7]

The joke has been frequently extended over the years. For example, a material safety data sheet — a list of information about potentially dangerous materials used in research and industry — has been created for it.[8]

Contents
1 Original web appearance
2 Public efforts involving DHMO
3 Terminology
4 See also
5 References
6 External links


Original web appearance

The first appearance on the internet was attributed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette to the so-called Coalition to Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide,[5][9] a hoax organization started by Craig Jackson following the initial newsgroup discussions. The site included the following warning:[10]

Dihydrogen monoxide:

is called "hydroxyl acid", the substance is the major component of acid rain.
contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
may cause severe burns.
is fatal if inhaled.
contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.
Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
as an industrial solvent and coolant.
in nuclear power plants.
in the production of Styrofoam.
as a fire retardant.
in many forms of cruel animal research.
in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.



Public efforts involving DHMO
The logo of DHMO.org, primary current residence of the dihydrogen monoxide hoax
In 1989, Eric Lechner, Lars Norpchen and Matthew Kaufman circulated a Dihydrogen Monoxide contamination warning on the University of California, Santa Cruz Campus via photocopied fliers.[11] The concept originated one afternoon when Kaufman recalled a similar warning about "Hydrogen Hydroxide" that had been published in his mother's hometown paper, the Durand (Michigan) Express, and the three then worked to coin a term that "sounded more dangerous". Lechner typed up the original warning flier on Kaufman's computer, and a trip to the local photocopying center followed that night.

In 1994, Craig Jackson created a web page for the Coalition to Ban DHMO.[10]

The Friends of Hydrogen Hydroxide was created by Dan Curtis Johnson partly as a foil on the Coalition page, to provide evidence of 'misguided' supporters of dihydrogen monoxide. This form of collaborative connivance is a classic tool of internet spoofers.[12]

In 1997, Nathan Zohner, a 14-year-old junior high student at Eagle Rock Junior High School in Idaho Falls, Idaho, gathered 43 votes to ban the chemical, out of 50 people surveyed among his classmates. Zohner received the first prize at Greater Idaho Falls Science Fair for analysis of the results of his survey.[6] In recognition of his experiment, journalist James K. Glassman coined the term "Zohnerism" to refer to "the use of a true fact to lead a scientifically and mathematically ignorant public to a false conclusion."[13]

In 1998, drawing inspiration from Jackson's web page and Zohner's research, Tom Way created the website DHMO.org, including links to some legitimate sites such as the Environmental Protection Agency and National Institutes of Health.

On April 1, 1998 (April Fools' Day), a member of the Australian Parliament announced a campaign to ban dihydrogen monoxide internationally.[14]
The idea was used for a segment of an episode of the Penn & Teller show Penn & Teller: Bull****!, in which an actor (Kris McGaha) and a camera crew gathered signatures from people considering themselves "concerned environmentalists" on a petition to ban DHMO.[15]

In 2001 a staffer in New Zealand Green Party MP Sue Kedgley's office responded to a request for support for a campaign to ban dihydrogen monoxide by saying she was "absolutely supportive of the campaign to ban this toxic substance". This was criticised in press releases by the National Party[citation needed], one of whose MP's fell for the very same hoax six years later.[16]

In March 2004, Aliso Viejo, California almost considered banning the use of foam containers at city-sponsored events because dihydrogen monoxide is part of their production. A paralegal had asked the city council to put it on the agenda; he later attributed it to poor research.[17] The law was pulled from the agenda before it could come to a vote, but not before the city received a raft of bad publicity.[6]

In 2006, in Louisville, Kentucky, David Karem, executive director of the Waterfront Development Corporation, a public body that operates Waterfront Park, wished to deter bathers from using a large public fountain. "Counting on a lack of understanding about water's chemical makeup," he arranged for signs reading: "DANGER WATER – CONTAINS HIGH LEVELS OF HYDROGEN – KEEP OUT" to be posted on the fountain at public expense.[18][19]
Several online petitions to the British Prime Minister on this subject have been correctly identified by the Prime Minister's office as hoaxes, and rejected.[20]

In 2007 Jacqui Dean, New Zealand National Party MP, fell for the hoax, writing a letter to Associate Minister of Health Jim Anderton asking "Does the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs have a view on the banning of this drug?"[16][21][22]

On April 1, 2010, the Dutch triathlon webzine Triathlonweb.nl stated in an April Fool's joke that WADA has put DHMO on the banned substances list, as it is detrimental for your health (e.g. when inhaled or ingested in large quantities) and improves sporting performance.[23]

On April 1, 2010, Canadian Member of Parliament Andrew Scheer used the DHMO hoax as the basis for an April Fool's Day "media release" on his web site, in which he claimed to have tabled a bill to ban the substance from all federal government buildings.[24]

Terminology

The water molecule has the chemical formula H2O, meaning each molecule of water is composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Literally, the term "dihydrogen monoxide" means "two hydrogen, one oxygen", consistent with its molecular formula: the prefix di- in dihydrogen means "two", the prefix mono- in monoxide means "one", and an oxide is a compound that contains one or more oxygen atoms.[25]

The use of numerical prefixes is typical nomenclature for compounds formed by covalent bonds, which are present in water.[26][27] The prefix for the first named element is often dropped if the elements involved commonly form only one compound, or even if the number of atoms of the first-named element is the same in all the compounds of the two (or more) elements.[25] Thus H2S is often simply called hydrogen sulfide, and lithium oxide is a common name for Li2O. However, the names dihydrogen sulfide,[28] dilithium oxide,[29] and dilithium monoxide[30] are also commonly used both in industry and in universities, despite the fact Li2O is ionic.

The mono- prefix is often dropped for the second-named element if it is the only common compound the elements form.[31] Thus for instance the IUPAC name of H2S is hydrogen sulfide rather than hydrogen monosulfide.[32] However, since carbon and oxygen can form several compounds (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, tricarbon dioxide, and dicarbon monoxide), the mono- prefix is kept, as it is with silicon monoxide and silicon dioxide. Indeed, hydrogen and oxygen do form another common compound, H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide). Using prefix nomenclature, H2O2 would be called dihydrogen dioxide. Thus, keeping the mono- in dihydrogen monoxide does serve to distinguish it from another compound.

Various names for water are commonly used within the scientific community. Some such names include hydrogen oxide, as well as an alkali name of hydrogen hydroxide, and several acid names such as hydroxic acid, hydroxylic acid, and hydroxilic acid. The term "hydroxyl acid" used in the original hoax is slightly incorrect, as it does not follow convention. An additional name, μ-oxido dihydrogen, has been developed for this compound.[33]

Under the 2005 revisions of IUPAC nomenclature of inorganic chemistry, there is no single correct name for every compound.[34] The primary function of chemical nomenclature is to ensure that each name refers, unambiguously, to a single substance. It is considered less important to ensure that each substance should have a single name, although the number of acceptable names is limited.[34] Water is one acceptable name for this compound, even though it is neither a systematic nor an international name and is specific to just one phase of the compound. The other IUPAC recommendation is oxidane.[35]

See also Chemical nomenclature
Parody science
Sense and reference
Water intoxication

References
1.^ Carder, L; Willingham, P.; Bibb, D. (2001), "Case-based, problem-based learning: Information literacy for the real world", Research Strategies 18 (3): 181–190, doi:10.1016/S0734-3310(02)00087-3, ScienceDirect - Research Strategies : Case-based, problem-based learning : : Information literacy for the real world (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0734331002000873) .

2.^ Leigh, G. J. et al. (1998), Principles of chemical nomenclature: a guide to IUPAC recommendations, Blackwell Science Ltd, UK, pp. 27–28, ISBN 0-86542-685-6, http://www.iupac.org/publications/books/principles/principles_of_nomenclature.pdf

3.^ Leigh, G. J. et al. (1998), Principles of chemical nomenclature: a guide to IUPAC recommendations, Blackwell Science Ltd, UK, p. 34, ISBN 0-86542-685-6, http://www.iupac.org/publications/books/principles/principles_of_nomenclature.pdf

4.^ Erich Lechner (February 23, 1990), Warning! Dangerous Contamination! (original usenet posting), Usenet rec.humor.funny archive, Warning! Dangerous Contamination! - rec.humor.funny | Google Groups (http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor.funny/browse_thread/thread/3f985a069a2a19d8/)

5.^ a b Kruszelnicki, Karl S. (2006), Mysterious Killer Chemical, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Mysterious killer chemical › Dr Karl's Great Moments In Science (ABC Science) (http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1631494.htm) .

6.^ a b c d Dihydrogen Monoxide from Urban Legends Reference Pages, accessed 25 September 2006.

7.^ Knight, Bernard (1998), Lawyers Guide to Forensic Medicine, Routledge, pp. 280, ISBN 9781859411599, Lawyers Guide to Forensic Medicine - Google Books (http://books.google.com/?id=CMA4_NHHc
8wC&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=%22monoxide+poisoning%22+-carbon)

8.^ "DHMO Material Safety Data Sheet". Improbable Research. Improbable Research Blog Archive (http://improbable.com/2010/03/24/dhmo-material-safety-data-sheet/).

9.^ Roddy., Dennis B. (1997), Internet-inspired prank lands 4 teens in hot water, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (published April 19, 1997)

10.^ a b Craig Jackson (1994), Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!, Coalition to ban DHMO, archived from the original on 1996-10-31, http://web.archive.org/web/19961031232918/http://media.circus.com/~no_dhmo/ . Coalition to ban DHMO officers, Coalition to ban DHMO, http://web.archive.org/web/19970125144038/media.circus.com/~no_dhmo/members.html .

11.^ The original poster circulated at UC Santa Cruz (PDF)

12.^ Hydrogen Hydroxide: Now More Than Ever! (http://www.armory.com/~crisper/DHMO/)

13.^ Glassman, James K (1997). "Dihydrogen Monoxide: Unrecognized Killer". The Washington Post. http://www.junkscience.com/news/glassman.html. Retrieved 2007-03-08.

14.^ Campaign launched against dihydrogen monoxide, Deutsche Presse-Agentur, April 1, 1998 .

15.^ "Penn & Teller: Bull****!" Environmental Hysteria (2003), Internet Movie Database, "Penn & Teller: Bull****!" Environmental Hysteria (TV episode 2003) - IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0672528/)

16.^ a b Gnad, Megan (2007-09-14). "MP tries to ban water". New Zealand Herald. MP tries to ban water - National - NZ Herald News (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10463579).

17.^ Local officials nearly fall for H2O hoax, at MSNBC 15 March 2004, accessed 25 September 2006.

18.^ Water without hydrogen would warrant warning, Louisville Courier-Journal, Monday, July 17, 2006 (link inactive as of Friday, May 18, 2007)

19.^ Danger! H in H2O, Chemical & Engineering News, October 23, 2006 webcite mirror

20.^ search.petitions.number10.gov.uk/kbroker/number10/petitions/search.lsim?ha=1159&qt=dihydrogen (search result for "dihydrogen" among rejected petitions on e-petition site at number10.gov.uk; not linked because of an over-general Wikipedia blacklist

21.^ "Questions And Answers – Wednesday, 12 September 07". Scoop. 2007-09-13. Questions And Answers - Wednesday, 12 September 07 | Scoop News (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0709/S00224.htm).

22.^ "PDF file of related correspondence" (PDF). Scoop. 2007-09-13. http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/pdfs/0709/DeanDHMO.pdf.

23.^ "Doping hunt rampage: sports itself is in danger". 2010-04-01. Triathlonweb.nl | Nieuws | 2010 | Dopingjacht slaat door: sportbeoefening zelf in gevaar (http://www.triathlonweb.nl/twn/show.php?chapter=Nieuws&ID=10,057).

24.^ "REGINA-QU'APPELLE MP TABLES LEGISLATION TO BAN DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE". 2010-04-01. Andrew Scheer, MP - Regina-Qu'Appelle: Dihydrogen Monoxide (http://www.andrewmp.ca/090401_release_dhmo.html).

25.^ a b Van Bramer, S.E. (1996), Chemical Nomenclature, Chemical Nomenclature (http://science.widener.edu/svb/pset/nomen_b.html) .

26.^ Leigh, G. J. et al. 1998. Principles of chemical nomenclature: a guide to IUPAC recommendations, p. 28. Blackwell Science Ltd, UK. ISBN 0-86542-685-6.

27.^ Nishiura, James, "Polar Covalent Bonds", Biology 4, City University of New York, http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/biology/bio4fv/page/polar_c.htm .

28.^ Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (PDF), Dihydrogen sulfide, California Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pdf/7783064.pdf .

29.^ Diagnostics on calculations: Species with negative natural orbital occupation numbers, National Institutes of Health, CCCBDB Diagnostics on calculations (http://cccbdb.nist.gov/diagnostics.asp)

30.^ Lithium oxide, PubChem public chemical database, Lithium oxide - PubChem Public Chemical Database (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=82891&loc=ec_rcs)

31.^ Leigh, G. J. et al. 1998. Principles of chemical nomenclature: a guide to IUPAC recommendations, p. 28. Blackwell Science Ltd, UK. ISBN 0-86542-685-6: "The multiplicative prefixes may not be necessary if the oxidation states are explicit or are clearly understood."

32.^ Hydrogen sulfide, PubChem public chemical database, Hydrogen Sulfide - PubChem Public Chemical Database (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=402) .

33.^ "/www.bluelaketec.com". Bluelake Technologies. Bluelake Technologies (http://www.bluelaketec.com/awater.htm). Retrieved 2 April 2010.

34.^ a b IUPAC Report: General Aims, Functions and Methods of Chemical Nomenclature (March 2004) http://www.iupac.org/reports/provisional/abstract04/RB-prs310804/Chap1-3.04.pdf

35.^ Leigh, G. J. et al. 1998. Principles of chemical nomenclature: a guide to IUPAC recommendations, p. 99. Blackwell Science Ltd, UK. ISBN 0-86542-685-6
External links

Dihydrogen Monoxide website
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!
Friends of Hydrogen Hydroxide
Some responses by college students

sdt463
1st April 2011, 10:59 PM
On normal form not sure Bob Brown didn't start this thread.:wasntme:

superquag
1st April 2011, 11:38 PM
That you did'nt donate, Quarks, won't be held against you... just water under the bridge

digger
1st April 2011, 11:58 PM
Yeah well...

wait till Brown realises that throughout the Riverland area since the commencement of the drought farmers and orchardists have been fighting for permission to spray MORE of this stuff on their fruit and trees!!

The govt here deemed the allowable rate at 16% but after constant campaigning it looks like they will allow 100% spraying rate soon!!

(unknown how long this may be allowed at that rate!)

Yep if Brown realises that soon theyll be allowed to pump and spray this stuff ON FOOD PRODUCTS he will be livid...

lets keep it a secret.

digger

OffTrack
2nd April 2011, 07:01 AM
Why is Bob Brown so quiet on this issue!!

Bob Brown was a vocal campaigner against the large scale storage of dihydrogen monoxide in wilderness areas of Tasmania during the 1980's. You guys are just slow to catch on ;)

p38arover
2nd April 2011, 08:02 AM
Yeah well...

wait till Brown realises that throughout the Riverland area since the commencement of the drought farmers and orchardists have been fighting for permission to spray MORE of this stuff on their fruit and trees!!

The govt here deemed the allowable rate at 16% but after constant campaigning it looks like they will allow 100% spraying rate soon!!

(
Too late. It started half a century ago. Look at the area around Hume Weir.

http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/73388819.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921F7C3FC3F69D929FD3D6E8E24F8AD364C D5DF6DE7483527A2A51227B5C84CC38EC6E7E4E2CE924510

seano87
2nd April 2011, 12:21 PM
Well, I voted that it should be banned, but only in its pure form. It should only be released to the public only in a less toxic state. I believe this detoxification would be best handled by a company by the name of Coopers. But mentioning that preferred specialist could just open a can of worms - my apologies!

Daisy Driver
3rd April 2011, 05:48 AM
Close call! Wikipedia saves the day!

digger
27th July 2012, 10:32 PM
Figured Id add the details to this... here is a basic MSDS.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET FOR DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRODUCT NAME: DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE
FORMULA WT: 18.00
CAS NO.: 07732-18-5
NIOSH/RTECS NO.: ZC0110000
COMMON SYNONYMS: DIHYDROGEN OXIDE, HYDRIC ACID
PRODUCT CODES: 4218,4219
EFFECTIVE: 05/30/86 REVISION #01

LABORATORY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

SAFETY GLASSES; LAB COAT

PRECAUTIONARY LABEL STATEMENTS

STORAGE: KEEP IN TIGHTLY CLOSED CONTAINER.

BOILING POINT: 100 C ( 212 F) VAPOR PRESSURE(MM HG): 17.5

MELTING POINT: 0 C ( 32 F) VAPOR DENSITY(AIR=1): N/A

SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 1.00 EVAPORATION RATE: N/A

SOLUBILITY(H2O): COMPLETE (IN ALL PROPORTIONS) % VOLATILES BY VOLUME: 100

APPEARANCE & ODOR: ODORLESS, CLEAR COLORLESS LIQUID.

TOXICITY: LD50 (IPR-MOUSE)(G/KG) - 190
LD50 (IV-MOUSE) (MG/KG) - 25

DISPOSAL PROCEDURE
DISPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.

SAF-T-DATA(TM) STORAGE COLOR CODE: ORANGE (GENERAL STORAGE)

SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
KEEP CONTAINER TIGHTLY CLOSED. SUITABLE FOR ANY GENERAL CHEMICAL STORAGE
AREA. DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE IS CONSIDERED A NON-REGULATED PRODUCT, BUT
REACTS VIGOROUSLY WITH SOME MATERIALS. THESE INCLUDE SODIUM, POTASSIUM
AND OTHER ALKALI METALS; ELEMENTAL FLUORINE; AND STRONG DEHYDRATING AGENTS
SUCH AS SULFURIC ACID. IT FORMS EXPLOSIVE GASES WITH CALCIUM CARBIDE.
AVOID CONTACT WITH ALL MATERIALS UNTIL INVESTIGATION SHOWS SUBSTANCE IS
COMPATIBLE. EXPANDS SIGNIFICANTLY UPON FREEZING. DO NOT STORE IN RIGID
CONTAINER AND PROTECT FROM FREEZING.

DOMESTIC (D.O.T.)

PROPER SHIPPING NAME CHEMICALS, N.O.S. (NON-REGULATED)

INTERNATIONAL (I.M.O.)

PROPER SHIPPING NAME CHEMICALS, N.O.S. (NON-REGULATED)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WARNING:-
Dihydrogen monoxide:

is also called "hydroxyl acid", the substance is the major component of acid rain.
contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
may cause severe burns.
is fatal if inhaled.
contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
as an industrial solvent and coolant.
in nuclear power plants.
in the production of Styrofoam.
as a fire retardant.
in many forms of cruel animal research.
in the distribution of pesticides.

Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

ramblingboy42
28th July 2012, 07:15 AM
bloody hell digger, why did you dig this thread up again

ramblingboy42
28th July 2012, 07:15 AM
hmmm just for that, I'm going to start words of wisdom again

digger
29th July 2012, 11:34 AM
bloody hell digger, why did you dig this thread up again

I was sent an email waring that the msds for dihydrogen monoxide is being removed from the web, this kills my original link, so I just added the msds so that the thread still made some monocom of sense, if there was a button that left it in the background after update I'd have used it...

:}