PDA

View Full Version : 170% efficiency apparently


Casper
6th July 2011, 11:31 PM
Mmmm what do you think of this.....?

YouTube - ‪FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES‬‏
YouTube - ‪FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES‬‏

Cheers Casper.
THE BOOGER
7th July 2011, 12:21 AM
Apparently these pumps have been around since 1995 but so far no one has been able to prove more power out than put in;)

Directory:Cavitation Heaters - PESWiki (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Cavitation_Heaters)

seems that quite a few people make them be good if they worked as well as they say:)
Blknight.aus
7th July 2011, 07:11 AM
170% effeciency is achievable.... BUT its a statistical value only....

lets say that you have a machine that uses 1000w of energy to do a job and another uses 588.235294 watts to do the same job...

in direct comparison to the first machine the second is 170% efficient.
Pedro_The_Swift
7th July 2011, 08:13 AM
hhhmmm,,
how about connecting the steam to an electrical turbine,,
then if the turbine makes more electricity than the electric motor requires to turn the pump-------
THE BOOGER
7th July 2011, 08:16 AM
But that would be a perpetual motion machine and we all know that only leonardo has made one of those:D
Pedro_The_Swift
7th July 2011, 08:20 AM
I loved the scene out of Aliens where the trip is so long they put the crew to sleep,,
but the dippy bird is still dipping when they wake up,,
http://trickofmind.com/images/puzzles/perpetual-drinking-bird.png
dswatts
7th July 2011, 08:46 AM
Produces more energy than it uses?
Did anyone notice the size of the motor driving the pump:eek:
Casper
7th July 2011, 10:16 AM
170% effeciency is achievable.... BUT its a statistical value only....

lets say that you have a machine that uses 1000w of energy to do a job and another uses 588.235294 watts to do the same job...

in direct comparison to the first machine the second is 170% efficient.

Don't you love statistics reporting....they can say what ever you want them to.


hhhmmm,,
how about connecting the steam to an electrical turbine,,
then if the turbine makes more electricity than the electric motor requires to turn the pump-------

Yeah but the pump is 170% efficient but they will tell you that the turbine will only be 10 to 15% efficient so that wont work.

That was my very first thought.

Cheers Casper