mools
20th September 2011, 05:59 PM
I seem to be having a few issues with my temperature gauge. Now I know people have their thoughts on this gauge but mine has always been pretty reliable (uninformative) until yesterday that is.
Yesterday on my drive home I noticed it did not move more than a few mm's past cold - unusual since one warmed up it usually resides about 2 mm's shy of dead center (no matter what) which, I believe, is what they should do as they are some type of normalised instrument.
So I had a better look at it today.
I have an after market coolant temp sender (located in an adaptor at the same place near the head as the OEM sender) which shows me getting up to (a believable) temp of around 90 - 93 deg, despite the needle on the land rover gauge not moving much at all. I set the nanocom evo up and that is telling me temp between 56 and 65 deg (much too low to be real during a sustained 100 kph).
The needle on the gauge (occasionally) lifts a little and tries to get towards the center (at the same time nanocom reading will lift to 75 - 84 deg) but this is short lived and is then drops back down to just above the blue marker
I test (pulse) the gauge with the Nanocom and it responds OK - well the needle blips up to the center and back.
What's going on here? Is it, as I think it may be, that the OEM temp sender knackered / playing up so the gauge gets false reading from the ECU and the Nanocom gets the same false info to display.
Can I just ignore the temp gauge and go off of my aftermarket one? Or is there a risk to the engine with the ECU thinking it is at a lower temp than it is? My understanding is the thermostat is mechanical so should operate as normal. The viscose fan does it's own, viscose, thing.
I'd appreciate the thoughts of any one with any similar experience or knowledge off this issue. I've recently changed the coolant (replaced OAT with OAT
Cheer,
Ian.
Yesterday on my drive home I noticed it did not move more than a few mm's past cold - unusual since one warmed up it usually resides about 2 mm's shy of dead center (no matter what) which, I believe, is what they should do as they are some type of normalised instrument.
So I had a better look at it today.
I have an after market coolant temp sender (located in an adaptor at the same place near the head as the OEM sender) which shows me getting up to (a believable) temp of around 90 - 93 deg, despite the needle on the land rover gauge not moving much at all. I set the nanocom evo up and that is telling me temp between 56 and 65 deg (much too low to be real during a sustained 100 kph).
The needle on the gauge (occasionally) lifts a little and tries to get towards the center (at the same time nanocom reading will lift to 75 - 84 deg) but this is short lived and is then drops back down to just above the blue marker
I test (pulse) the gauge with the Nanocom and it responds OK - well the needle blips up to the center and back.
What's going on here? Is it, as I think it may be, that the OEM temp sender knackered / playing up so the gauge gets false reading from the ECU and the Nanocom gets the same false info to display.
Can I just ignore the temp gauge and go off of my aftermarket one? Or is there a risk to the engine with the ECU thinking it is at a lower temp than it is? My understanding is the thermostat is mechanical so should operate as normal. The viscose fan does it's own, viscose, thing.
I'd appreciate the thoughts of any one with any similar experience or knowledge off this issue. I've recently changed the coolant (replaced OAT with OAT
Cheer,
Ian.