in the press

[incisor]

pity the predictable agenda of that segment of the press spoilt the article.

http://www.aulro.com/afvb/attachment.php?attachmentid=43161&stc=1&d=1328221770

[Col.Coleman]

A reply letter to both the "Journalist" and editor are in formulation.

Typical attitude of come along with an agenda you want to push, and pick the bits out you want and portray them out of context.

The cars guide one is thankfully not as bad, but still, "Not Happy Jan".
My 1948 Series 1 Land Rover | Gallery | carsguide.com.au (http://www.carsguide.com.au/pics/my-1948-series-1-land-rover/3259/5/65133/)

It won't be the end of this.

Lost opportunity for them too I think.

CC

[Scallops]

...and I resent my lovely old vehicle being showcased to push some bull****e self serving crap the "Curious Fail" seem to be hammering at the moment...:( :mad:

[Pedro_The_Swift]

What paper?

edit, scratch that.

[101RRS]

I cannot read it - even after copying it and zooming in - what is the gist of the article?

Garry

[Outlaw]

Didn't expect a completely biased article did we? It is the media we are talking about and they are political.

Still not a bad article and some good promotion regardless [thumbsupbig]