PDA

View Full Version : Wheel on Bonnet = Aerodynamic improvement



rrturboD
23rd July 2012, 11:26 PM
Here is proof, for those who want to read it all I have attached the full South African University research paper, ....for the rest of us here is the main findings:

"Placing a tyre (spare wheel) on the bonnet of a Land Rover Defender decreases the vehicle’s aerodynamic drag by roughly 8%. The best position for a short roof rack is at the most rear position on a vehicle. The addition of an unloaded roof rack can increase fuel consumption with roughly 21% for the Land Rover Defender and 26% for the Toyota Hilux Bakkie (Ed: ute)."

jakeslouw
23rd July 2012, 11:38 PM
Some countries study the Higgs boson......

we study the IMPORTANT STUFF! :p :D

TimNZ
23rd July 2012, 11:39 PM
"Placing a tyre (spare wheel) on the bonnet of a Land Rover Defender decreases the vehicle’s aerodynamic drag by roughly 8%. The best position for a short roof rack is at the most rear position on a vehicle. The addition of an unloaded roof rack can increase fuel consumption with roughly 21% for the Land Rover Defender and 26% for the Toyota Hilux Bakkie (Ed: ute)."

Wow! I knew roof racks didn't help your fuel economy, but think of how many vehicles you see getting around with empty roof racks on :eek:

Davo
24th July 2012, 12:51 AM
Whew! What a read. They really should make a snappy 2-minute Youtube video instead. :D That's great stuff, and well worth the work they put into it.

superquag
24th July 2012, 02:27 AM
Wonder how much drag you'd get with a pair of RHINO racks (two single bars).


Dunno if I want a spare wheel on the bonnet of my Classic....:o

newhue
24th July 2012, 05:42 AM
duno but it would be better than those big boxy roof tents.

ugu80
24th July 2012, 05:47 AM
Dunno if I want a spare wheel on the bonnet of my Classic....:o
Try opening the bonnet with a spare wheel on it!:spudniklifter:

jerryd
24th July 2012, 06:41 AM
Maybe that's why mine is so thirsty :eek:

pop058
24th July 2012, 07:06 AM
Maybe that's why mine is so thirsty :eek:

I didn't think it mentioned chickens in the report :p

460cixy
24th July 2012, 08:08 AM
That big cock on the bonnet would have to help

JDNSW
24th July 2012, 08:12 AM
I have often thought about installing a set of vortex generators along the front edge of the bonnet on my 110 - should have a similar effect to spare, but neither heavy nor blocking your vision.

John

TheEntertainer
24th July 2012, 08:35 AM
Hi,

Thought you may find this interesting, well tha attached doc on the defender aerodynamics.

Cheers

The Entertainer

p38arover
24th July 2012, 09:01 AM
Threads merged.

pannawonica
24th July 2012, 12:37 PM
Thank you most interesting ! I have always beleived that towing a trailer empty or loaded was a more economical way of moving stuff. Generally on longer runs 1k miles I find it only increases fuel burn by around 1.5 litres per 100Km's. However I do understand trailers are not practical in all circumstances.:D:BigThumb:

luke68
26th July 2012, 05:36 AM
Rhino Bars on my Disco is about 1.5-2L/100km worse off. Put them on for a while as I was carrying pipes and other stuff for renovations. After renovations left them on and after a while ( A few fills of the tank) I noticed that I was getting less out of a tank of Diesel than before. Took the Rhino Bars off and fuel ecenomy back to normal.

Cheers
Luke

gusthedog
26th July 2012, 08:31 AM
I too have rhino bars. I was thinking of fabricating up a wind deflector that follows the roofline and lifts the wind over the bars. I have three bars and at the rear I was going to put a canvas bag on a platform when travelling. I was also thinking about designing a wing to push the air over said bag. Was thinking alloy for the wings. To get the shape of the roof I was going to use plastic conduit held in a wooden frame and then transfer this shape to the alloy to get the correct roofline. They quite often use conduit to get nice curves in home made boat building so I thought It would work in this application too.

Now if I can just finish of the fence, the veggie garden, put in a new back lawn, build a chook pen blah blah blah..... I'll have some time to make them!:D

Hymie
26th July 2012, 03:41 PM
So am I better off having a road tread tyre or an off road tread tyre on the bonnet?
Will the blocks on the off road tyre create vortices that will affect consumption?

Dougal
27th July 2012, 08:12 AM
Thank you most interesting ! I have always beleived that towing a trailer empty or loaded was a more economical way of moving stuff. Generally on longer runs 1k miles I find it only increases fuel burn by around 1.5 litres per 100Km's. However I do understand trailers are not practical in all circumstances.:D:BigThumb:

Here in NZ the legal towing speed is 90km/h and without 100km/h. I can tow an empty trailer at 90km/h and get exactly the same 10km/l as I get on the same trip with no trailer.

This experiment happened because I drove 500km with a trailer to get something that didn't arrive. So I drove 500km home again with the trailer in tow. I had to make the trip anyway, the trailer was the extra bit.

My best estimates of bikes on a bike-rack on the back is 1 litre/100km extra, bikes on a roofrack 2 litres/100km.

Bush65
27th July 2012, 09:39 AM
Maybe that's why mine is so thirsty :eek:
Put the hen on the front and shackle 2 roosters back near the windscreen - should fly up the hills then :D

460cixy
27th July 2012, 10:05 AM
Looks like I better get a spare wheel mount for the bonnet no where to mount it at all on the tray back gives me the ****s

ramblingboy42
29th July 2012, 09:22 PM
Try opening the bonnet with a spare wheel on it!:spudniklifter:

did it nearly every day for years first parading vehicles in the army.

Judo
18th May 2015, 11:14 AM
This document is amazing. Bumping for others to see who missed it in the past! :)

If you want to skip straight to the point, page 31 of PDF (which read page 21 on document page).

simmo
19th May 2015, 01:24 PM
It's interesting I suppose, but a bit academic, the test was conducted at equivalent to 187km/hr, and the Reynolds number was fairly constant after 165 km/hr. It tells us what we already know; a roof rack increases fuel consumption, the actual percentage is not really accurate because most of us will rarely exceed 110 km/hr. It was interesting about the aerodynamic improvement with a spare wheel on the bonnet of the defender. It would not apply to many cars, because the defender has a fairly unique shape in modern times, and probably the poorest Cd of any car made in the last 25 -30 years. Volvo 2 series was often criticized for boxy (but practical) shape, & poor Cd. Volvos reasoning was Cd is a secondary importance to practicality for cars that spend most of their time below 100km/h. They must have got something right because it didn't stop them selling 2 series for 25 years. I notice on my tdi landy sitting on 95 -100kms hour with fully loaded 2.2 meter roof rack I still get less than 11 liters per 100km. I recently bought bonnet for carrying a spare wheel so I'm looking forward to an improvement. :D

PhilipA
19th May 2015, 03:41 PM
Land Rover have always known that.
I was rereading an older LRO in the dunny, and came across an article by one of the Defender engineers who stated just that.
Regards Philip A

gusthedog
19th May 2015, 04:00 PM
This thread has always cracked me up :D

Blokes who drive cars shaped like fridges worrying about aerodynamics :Rolling: :wasntme:

DiscoDB
19th May 2015, 08:30 PM
This thread has always cracked me up :D

Blokes who drive cars shaped like fridges worrying about aerodynamics :Rolling: :wasntme:

...or turning the fridge into a brick.

Would have been fun to study.

But no test for spare tyre on bonnet plus short roof rack at back...can this cancel each other out?