PDA

View Full Version : Dirty FL2



maddia
24th March 2013, 09:52 PM
Bought the Freelander last year. Finally had a chance to try it offroad. Followed friends in a Prado and Patrol up to the Denmans Range camping site, West of Mackay. It dragged the underside through the mud a couple of times and have a ding in one of the underside brackets following a rough creek crossing, But the car never felt like it could not make it.

Very impressed.

Picture taken at Denmans Range, twice as dirty by the time we got home.

58161

mikehzz
25th March 2013, 07:39 PM
They will go anywhere that their clearance allows. Mine has never been pulled up by anything steep and the traction control is simply excellent. The wheels are just too small for some situations.

354 chamberlain
31st March 2013, 07:11 PM
I have just returned from a trip of SA that included parts of the flinders ranges and the oodnadata track . done some fairly serious off road work in the flinders and not once did it stutter .Steep loose rock climbs almost vertical drop offs sand ect taught me to trust the trs settings and hill decent modes ,not easy when you cant seethe track or bottom over the bonnet . However clearance is a bit of a problem especialy the fuel tank ,std protection plates are a bit ordinary and I have a couple of skid marks to prove it. Looking at after market skid plates from Green Oval experince in Perth to protect tank and front end .

mikehzz
31st March 2013, 10:25 PM
Yes I have banged my tank a few times and it does affect the fuel gauge...must be the sensor in the tank. Mine is now empty when its on 1/4 full courtesy of a rock in the Vic High Country. :)

camel_landy
1st April 2013, 08:25 AM
The Mantec Sump & Tank guards are a very worthwhile investment... ;)

M

Alan7140
1st April 2013, 11:17 AM
Mine's now wearing a Green Oval tank guard courtesy a trip in the high country (Licola-Mansfield via Mt Howitt) where an unseen loose boulder rolling under the car in a long mud channel in a gully rendered the standard fuel tank joke for "protection" as being well beyond its use-by date. The guard does reduce rear clearance a bit (expected), and the outrigger attachment points are a bit too long and bend the outer edges downward even further (which will no doubt be "rectified" with the next decent hit), but the chances of any damage or puncturing of the fuel tank are dramatically reduced. It's not a full-length thing, though - the attachments are only at the front with rearward facing wings pressing flush against the length of the tank, so in the unlikely event of reversing into an obstacle and destroying the rear muffler first, the fuel tank is next in line and still vulnerable from that angle. Only minor observations, though - the fuel tank is now as safe as needs be for the sort of driving this vehicle is so good at - formed, if rough, tracks. Well worth the money compared with recovering the vehicle after holing the tank.

Coming off King Billy No 1 on that trip (pre mud-hole, note others' tyre scuff marks on foreground rocks - it's steeper than it looks - and where a Toyota Troopie driver was *most* surprised to see the FL2 up there, predicting I'd never get to Mansfield without "low", although I made it without so much as spinning a wheel... :) )

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2013/04/1532.jpg