View Full Version : Realistic travel times - google maps
catch-22
28th October 2013, 10:25 AM
NSW - Chatswood to Tenterfield via the A15 (new England). Google maps says 7 hours 22 minutes.
How accurate have you found google maps times? I recognise it probably doesn't take in to account stop/rest room/meal times.
sheerluck
28th October 2013, 10:41 AM
I find Google maps more accurate than my GPS (TomTom). Heading somewhere on Friday night and GM said 52mins, TomTom said 1 hour 10. Actually came out to 53mins.
Even On longer trips, I find GM pretty close.
Tusker
28th October 2013, 10:49 AM
I'm pretty sure Google Maps attempts to adjust for peak hour traffic. So maybe search again at a different time of day & see what happens.
Anyway, Chatswood - Tenterfield would be a least that long. Not any less.
Regards
Max P
catch-22
28th October 2013, 12:46 PM
At least that long.....
That's what I thought. Seems a little short
Treads
28th October 2013, 10:25 PM
I'd add about an extra 40 minutes; more if you've got children.
Have you thought about going up the Buckets Way? You'd save almost an hour.
Gumnut
28th October 2013, 10:40 PM
Hi,
Another thing google maps will do is add 20 minutes if you have to go through a security check point, like for instance a street address inside a barracks area.
Probably very accurately reflects the time a stranger would take..... But 19:50 more than a regular.
Gumnut
dullbird
28th October 2013, 10:54 PM
I find it quite accurate my garmin is based on google maps.
Bushie
29th October 2013, 08:34 AM
I put the route into both Whereis.com.au and into Garmin Mapsource, neither agree within 50km for distance, so there is no way they could have accurate timing.
Martyn
Lotz-A-Landies
29th October 2013, 09:04 AM
I put the route into both Whereis.com.au and into Garmin Mapsource, neither agree within 50km for distance, so there is no way they could have accurate timing.
MartynWhereis is a Sensis product, why would anyone expect Telstra to get anything correct.
Personally I'd be checking the Garmin against your eventual odo reading to see how accurate it is.
UncleHo
29th October 2013, 10:36 AM
I quite like the 2 Garmin's that we have fitted to our vehicles,even if I use them as my speedo,to avoid Mr. Newman's cash collection spree.
weeds
29th October 2013, 11:02 AM
Anything over 100-200km I work on covering 80km each hour of travel.....this takes into account traffic, toilet stops, lunch etc.....this is traveling at the posted speed ie not driving at 80km/hr
Hoges
29th October 2013, 02:40 PM
Yep...agree with that. Several years ago I started a "rolling log" of average travelling times... :angel: and it's interesting that having done several interstate trips in a Commodore V8 and the P38, the average driving time (not elapsed time) between BNE-SYD was a shade under 78km/hr in both vehicles. Average journey speeds around Bris metro area over the past 10 yrs have dropped from 32km/hr to 24 km/hr:mad:
Homestar
29th October 2013, 03:24 PM
As mentioned, GM is far more accurate than a Tom Tom - particularly if you have any unsealed roads to travel on - the Tom Tom seems to think your average speed will be 40 to 50KPH when on the dirt...
UncleHo
29th October 2013, 03:30 PM
I did 2 trips Syd/Bris last year to deliver 2 D1's first trip New England, what a goat track,2nd was Pacific H'way good quality road a lot dual h'wy beautiful drive just a shame that the D1 was a little tired, but we averaged about 85kph, both V8 gassed.
disco 3 door
29th October 2013, 04:20 PM
Would trust GM before Garmin. Travelled with mate whouses his Garmin & both times it has taken the longest route & longest time, one time it took him down a road which was not connected (paddock in the way).
Sent from my GT-N8020 using AULRO mobile app
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.