PDA

View Full Version : 3" exhaust



squidsd1
28th December 2013, 07:39 PM
is there a large difference in performance between a 3" straight through exhaust and standard exhaust with center muffler removed and straight through resinater on a 300tri disco

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

weeds
29th December 2013, 02:03 PM
I have standard size straight through no muffler or resonator

I'm not sure you will gain much if anything with a 3"

squidsd1
3rd January 2014, 09:12 PM
is it noticeably loud with no boxes at all do u notice the change in pick up, fuel economy , highway drone?

cheers

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

*RR*
3rd January 2014, 09:57 PM
the standard system has a few step downs, I think the smallest is just over 2.1"

3" has 50% more area then a 2.5" pipe...

2.1" = 13.8^2"
2.5" = 19.6^2"
3.0" = 28.3^2"

redrovertdi
3rd January 2014, 10:02 PM
yes, when the 3in pipe was fitted with one large muffler only in the centre, the turbo spools up way faster however you have to tune the injector pump to suit to gain more power[boost needs fuel], after tuning at MR the economy was better to, previously i had a standard pipe with centre muffler removed

*RR*
3rd January 2014, 10:10 PM
yes, when the 3in pipe was fitted with one large muffler only in the centre, the turbo spools up way faster however you have to tune the injector pump to suit to gain more power[boost needs fuel], after tuning at MR the economy was better to, previously i had a standard pipe with centre muffler removed

My dad runs a 3" and bigger cooler on his 300 without touching the pump and he reckons it made a world difference, mainly in the bottom end and mid range.

redrovertdi
4th January 2014, 08:07 AM
My dad runs a 3" and bigger cooler on his 300 without touching the pump and he reckons it made a world difference, mainly in the bottom end and mid range.


The first performance upgrade i did was a full front allisport/allard intercooler, it made no noticeable difference at all until the pump was tuned to suit

*RR*
4th January 2014, 11:02 AM
The first performance upgrade i did was a full front allisport/allard intercooler, it made no noticeable difference at all until the pump was tuned to suit

No idea, dude. Just relying what the old man has told me...

disco971
4th January 2014, 03:30 PM
get better intercooler hoses too, the factory ones always used to get soft and restrict performance.
3" from the turbo down to a 2.5" should work well.

*RR*
4th January 2014, 05:52 PM
get better intercooler hoses too, the factory ones always used to get soft and restrict performance.
3" from the turbo down to a 2.5" should work well.

that could work too...

the exhaust is just under 2.5" from the centre back and the down pipe is about 2.1" off the turbo...

slug_burner
4th January 2014, 09:50 PM
the standard system has a few step downs, I think the smallest is just over 2.1"

3" has 50% more area then a 2.5" pipe...

2.1" = 13.8^2"
2.5" = 19.6^2"
3.0" = 28.3^2"

Are you sure?

A = pi.r^2 or pi.(D/2)^2 the pipe dimensions I believe to have been expressed as diameters.

I'd say if we looked we could find an expression of resistance to flow for a given pipe size, no doubt that a bigger pipe will offer less restriction but there is a stage at which you will get diminishing returns.

squidsd1
5th January 2014, 06:34 AM
3" and intercooler upgrade and proper tune sounds like the go. does any and have torque figures or know what actual power the 300tdi makes with those kinds of mods ? kw/nm

cheers

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

Blknight.aus
5th January 2014, 07:03 AM
you dont NEED a 3 inch exhaust on the tdi300, a 2.5 thats mandrel bent is enough, however..

its cheaper to get a standard 3 inch job done in place and thats got the same effect.


theres no point in fitting up any of that stuff unless you sort out the dump from the turbo first, I get to see a lot of 3 inch exhuasts that still hook up to the standard turbo dump pipe.

squidsd1
5th January 2014, 07:13 AM
would most off the shelf exhaust pipes come with larger dump pipe?

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

kadine94
6th January 2014, 09:44 PM
Ive taken out the centre muffler and the resonator.Dad says put resonator back on ,you wont lose any power,is he right?Have only wound smoke screw up 1 1/2 turns so far.Better take off,its an auto.

*RR*
7th January 2014, 08:22 PM
Are you sure?

No, ****. I shouldn't come on here when I'm tired.

2.1" = 3.46"^2
2.5" = 4.91"^2
3.0" = 7.06"^2

the fact still remains that the 3" pipe has almost 50% more area.

squidsd1
7th January 2014, 08:41 PM
so is the 3" too big or is it just as beneficial to removed center muffler?

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

rick130
8th January 2014, 10:12 AM
so is the 3" too big or is it just as beneficial to removed center muffler?

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app


No, not too big.

If the Disco uses the same/similar centre box to a 300Tdi Defender, they are a straight through, perforated tube type muffler anyway so IMO any increase in performance from removal is a placebo.

A large pipe will drop EGT's and help off idle spool up.
my 3" Defender system dropped maximum EGT's by 25* which gives more scope for pump tuning.

In a Defender with a longer exhaust it also enables a much improved rev range through the gears as the stock 60mm/2.375" system while well made is a tad restrictive.

rick130
8th January 2014, 10:27 AM
theres no point in fitting up any of that stuff unless you sort out the dump from the turbo first, I get to see a lot of 3 inch exhuasts that still hook up to the standard turbo dump pipe.

A bit hard with a 300Tdi as the dump is cast as part of the turbine housing, but what can be done is throat the dump internals to match a 2.5" pipe and taper the 2.5" pipe to 3" nicely.

That works well.

tassydisco
9th January 2014, 09:26 AM
I had a 3 inch stainless with a straight through muffler on my 300tdi. Made a noticable difference down low especially. The droning on the highway sends you bonkers though, I wouldn't do it again simply because of the noise inside at highway speeds. Maybe invest in some good earmuffs? :D

squidsd1
9th January 2014, 09:39 AM
tasty disco, did u get much difference in fuel economy ?

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

Spel1
9th January 2014, 04:27 PM
If the Disco uses the same/similar centre box to a 300Tdi Defender, they are a straight through, perforated tube type muffler anyway so IMO any increase in performance from removal is a placebo.


The 300TDI Disco is not a straight through muffler. It looks like it from the outside - same apparent entry and exit points - but there are a series of baffles in the middle. I took mine off a couple of years ago (checked it then) replaced with a straight though muffler which slipped over the original pipe. Left the resonator in place also. No noticable increase in noise, no drone, but does spool up a bit quicker with slightly lower EGT's.

squidsd1
9th January 2014, 05:21 PM
that sounds like the go , replace the centre muffler with straight pipe .

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

rick130
10th January 2014, 05:00 AM
I had a 3 inch stainless with a straight through muffler on my 300tdi. Made a noticable difference down low especially. The droning on the highway sends you bonkers though, I wouldn't do it again simply because of the noise inside at highway speeds. Maybe invest in some good earmuffs? :D

You definitely need a resonator along with a large muffler with a 3" system otherwise the noise and drone is awful.

I made the mistake of building the system initially with no silencing whatsoever and it was horrific in both noise and resonance.

tassydisco
10th January 2014, 08:56 PM
tasty disco, did u get much difference in fuel economy ?

Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

Not sure if it changed I can't remember, it did 10l per 100km on highway, close to double in town. Turning 35 inch tyres and all sorts of other clobber so not sure if it's a very accurate test.;)