View Full Version : Still chasing vibration!!
nedflanders
1st February 2014, 08:24 AM
Still got a weird vibration from the front prop at 65kph after a 2" lift. If I fitted 3deg off set arms would this put the front UJ back in line, also would off set bushes do the same job (cheaper to buy and ship!) if I have to go the Disco prop route what fits? A D1 or D2 with flange? Cheers :)
n plus one
1st February 2014, 09:15 AM
Still got a weird vibration from the front prop at 65kph after a 2" lift. If I fitted 3deg off set arms would this put the front UJ back in line, also would off set bushes do the same job (cheaper to buy and ship!) if I have to go the Disco prop route what fits? A D1 or D2 with flange? Cheers :)
There's been a bit if discussion about this lately, but my understanding is that castor correction (except when done at the swivels) will make it harder on your front shaft. 
A DC prop is likely what you need ( assuming we're talking a lift-related issue).
Bush65
1st February 2014, 09:38 AM
Prop vibration is usually due to an excessive operating angle at the universal joints, and or unequal operating angles.
When Land Rover changed from leaf to coil springs they raised the front of the engine up to increase the travel of the front suspension.
This automatically created unequal operating angle, and will always be so. When they changed to the Puma engine, they raised the front of the engine further, creating an even worse operating angle for the universal at the front of the transfer case.
This is the bane of those who want to install a suspension lift in a Defender with the Puma engine. For some unknown reason, some are worse than others.
In a Rover, you will never ever equalise the operating angles of the universal joints no matter what you do with the radius arms or bushes.
Castor correction arms or bushes will however increase, not decrease the operating angle of the universals, particularly at the transfer case end, making the situation worse.
There are no cheap or easy fixes for the steering and vibration issues resulting from more than a moderate lift in Land Rovers.
Marty110
1st February 2014, 10:06 AM
slotting the swivels bolt holes is the only way to rotate the diff to get a better angle, or I ended up fitting a Cornay jointed front prop after several Disco 2 DC shaft failures - the DC is not very strong in these. Many other overseas sourced DC shafts available but some of these have reported issues too. Effectively the DC halves the operating angle - others will be able to explain the geometry of how this works. Castor correction bushes made mine worse as would corrected radius arms as explained by others. Good luck!
nedflanders
1st February 2014, 11:12 AM
Mines not a Puma but a TD5, and I went for a 2" lift nothing even considered moderate. Do corrected arms raise or lower the diff pinion? I can't for the life of me understand how slotting the swivels alters the diff orientation, fine it gets the castor back but only off set arms or bushes is going to rotate the Diff. From what I'm guessing the rear of the diff needs to be raised to correct the loss of castor after the lift and straighten the front prop front UJ.
n plus one
1st February 2014, 12:53 PM
Mines not a Puma but a TD5, and I went for a 2" lift nothing even considered moderate. Do corrected arms raise or lower the diff pinion? I can't for the life of me understand how slotting the swivels alters the diff orientation, fine it gets the castor back but only off set arms or bushes is going to rotate the Diff. From what I'm guessing the rear of the diff needs to be raised to correct the loss of castor after the lift and straighten the front prop front UJ.
They rotate the diff pinion, effectively lowering it.
TD5s suffer the same front prop issue as Pimas, though to a lesser degree.
Slotting the swivels doesn't rotate the diff, that's the whole point - correcting castor via other means rotates the diff making the pinion lower ;as above) and makes things even worse for your front prop. Slot the swivels and you'll only have the issues you're having now, not even worse issues!
In summary, you have an issue that can only be corrected with a DC, every castor correction option will either a): making things worse (bushes/arms) or b): not make things worse (swivels).
Marty110
1st February 2014, 01:19 PM
Mines not a Puma but a TD5, and I went for a 2" lift nothing even considered moderate. Do corrected arms raise or lower the diff pinion? I can't for the life of me understand how slotting the swivels alters the diff orientation, fine it gets the castor back but only off set arms or bushes is going to rotate the Diff. From what I'm guessing the rear of the diff needs to be raised to correct the loss of castor after the lift and straighten the front prop front UJ.
yep nedflanders you're right - poor old memory letting me down as I had 2 issues - vague and wandering steering plus vibration - the slotted swivels fixes the castor hence making steering more positive and the Cornay fixed the angularity. 
This from a post by SteveG explains it well: "From the factory, they come with approx 3deg positive caster in the  front suspension, but that reduces as you lift the ride height. Caster  reduces approx 1deg for every half an inch lift. A couple of inches lift and you're down towards 0deg. Positive caster  gives you directional stability and predictable steering. None or  negative makes them twitchy when you change direction. With them being live axle, the 2 main ways to increase caster are to  either fit caster correction bushes (which also changes diff pinion  angles which can create other issues), or to slot the mounting holes on the swivel ball where it bolts to the axle housing. Once slotted, the swivels can be rotated (rearwards at the top) to increase caster and get it back to the factory 3deg."
nedflanders
1st February 2014, 02:45 PM
Cheers for all the replies, I understand castor and the need for it, I could live with it as it is as I still get self centering and the steering isn't noticeably twitchy. My concern is prop vibration, having read lots it seems that the angles at each end need to be the same to cancel out the vibration, the diff end is a lot less angle than the t box end. To increase the angle I need in fact to lower the pinion which is what off set radius arms do, as long as the prop is phased correctly won't increasing the diff joint to match the t box joint stop the vibration?? I've seen plenty of lifts much higher that don't have issues. A DC may stop the vibration but won't bring back my castor.
n plus one
1st February 2014, 03:43 PM
Cheers for all the replies, I understand castor and the need for it, I could live with it as it is as I still get self centering and the steering isn't noticeably twitchy. My concern is prop vibration, having read lots it seems that the angles at each end need to be the same to cancel out the vibration, the diff end is a lot less angle than the t box end. To increase the angle I need in fact to lower the pinion which is what off set radius arms do, as long as the prop is phased correctly won't increasing the diff joint to match the t box joint stop the vibration?? I've seen plenty of lifts much higher that don't have issues. A DC may stop the vibration but won't bring back my castor.
If your vibration is being caused by an excessive angle in the Uni at the T/C end (which is typically the case in lifted TD5/Puma Deefers), then increasing any of your drive line angles is unlikely to assist?
I can confirm that my 2 inch lifted Puma with a DC and castor corrected arms has no front prop vibration issues.
FYI, OME suspension guide recommends a DC be fitted when a TD5 is lifted (it's just that on many TD5s people seem to get away without one).
Hope this helps.
justinc
1st February 2014, 03:53 PM
It is becoming increasingly the best thing to do when lifting ANY Td5 or Puma era Defender around 50mm; to avoid vibrations fit a double cardan joint shaft, and  slot the swivel housings to regain caster.
JC
Bush65
1st February 2014, 04:10 PM
Cheers for all the replies, I understand castor and the need for it, I could live with it as it is as I still get self centering and the steering isn't noticeably twitchy. My concern is prop vibration, having read lots it seems that the angles at each end need to be the same to cancel out the vibration, the diff end is a lot less angle than the t box end. To increase the angle I need in fact to lower the pinion which is what off set radius arms do, as long as the prop is phased correctly won't increasing the diff joint to match the t box joint stop the vibration?? I've seen plenty of lifts much higher that don't have issues. A DC may stop the vibration but won't bring back my castor.
The engine, gearbox, and transfer case slope down from front to rear.
The front diff slopes up from front to rear. If the drive flange end of the front diff is rotated down, as would need to occur to correct the castor change due to suspension lift, the operating angle of the uni at the transfer case will increase. The uni joint at the transfer case is already operating at too great an angle and increasing it further won't help.
Because the angles of the front and rear uni's on the front drive shaft are not equal, Land Rover assemble the front drive shaft so the uni's are out of phase to compensate.
You could try changing this by one spline more, or less to see if that helps.
However the reliable, proven, but $$$$ solution is to fit a double cardan drive shaft for the vibration issue, and fit slotted swivel balls to correct the castor issue. It seems you don't need to do the last as steering is not bothering you. With 50 mm lift, some drive fine, but others wander badly, another of those luck of the draw things. I had over 75 mm lift and steering was great with no castor correction, but I thank the tru-track front diff for that.
Spicer, one of the largest manufacturers of drive shafts for all types and sizes of vehicles, say IIRC the operating angle should be not greater than 3 degrees for vibration free operation. Have a read through the two drive shaft technical documents that I uploaded to the files section about halfway down the page (http://www.aulro.com/afvb/local_links.php?catid=7).
nedflanders
2nd February 2014, 05:55 PM
Managed to get hold of a DC cheap, going to change the UJ's for grease able ones then all I need to do is change the t-box flange, going to fit some castor correction bushes as well as it's fine round town but twitchy at highway speeds, plus the bilstein damper makes the car pull slightly right so hopefully castor (and checking kingpin preload) will cure this too.
nedflanders
12th February 2014, 09:57 PM
Quick update, finally changed the prop for a DC, right enough all vibration gone. I had the UJ's changed as well as the centre bearing and then balanced. Also went for QT castor correction arms, just need to adjust the kingpin preload now but that can wait until I change the discs at the weekend. So all in all a bloody expensive exercise for a 2" lift :(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.