Log in

View Full Version : Freelander end of life?



Rover82
19th May 2014, 12:50 PM
Members, I have been hearing things like when freelander is killed off with the new discovery sport in 2015, parts availablity would be difficult?

Also I am concerned about resale value now? Any Possibilities that resalse value might improve when it becomes a rare vehicle?

Any thoughts?

Sent from my GT-I9506 using AULRO mobile app

Tusker
19th May 2014, 01:04 PM
It'll still be made, just rebadged and repositioned in the lineup.

It'll be called a Discovery, & sit under the D4 etc in the same way it's cousin under the skin, the Evoque, sits under Range Rover family.

The Freelander range per se will be no more.

Regards
Max P

Vesko
19th May 2014, 06:30 PM
The Freelander range per se will be no more.


Which makes ours more precious.

freemander
20th May 2014, 12:47 PM
Then eventually a collectors item.....sweet!!!!!!

Hoges
21st May 2014, 12:56 AM
Then eventually a collectors item.....sweet!!!!!!

All LRs are "collectors' items"...tax collectors, spare parts sellers, service centres, used car salesmen... they all collect money from LR owners!:p:angel:

OldGoat
30th June 2014, 11:19 PM
Hmm, the lease is up on mine and the wife and i are wondering the same thing. To keep or get something else.

ByronB
2nd July 2014, 07:59 AM
Hi Gents,

I had my yearly 52k service carried out at Trivett Parramatta, very happy with the price charged, compared to my previous IX35 diesel the LR is cheaper over a full year to run $862 against $1100. Service costs only. I will admit I am a heavy road user, and have worried about the long service interval, however after 24k between services, nothing was required or needed doing. I know a lot of people speak badly of LR'S my experience is all positive so far.

Cheers

Finnie
5th July 2014, 01:10 PM
Hi
I have a rubbing noise coming from my driver side rear interior door, like around the window frame rubber of the door covering, I have attempted to remove the interior door covering with removing the bottom right hand screw and the top left hand screw with a cover cap over it near the interior door handle, at that point the door cover still reminded tightly fastened, I can only assume that there is more to it.... Can anyone advise on how to remove the left hand drivers side rear interior door cover? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Cheers

Rover82
24th July 2014, 09:52 PM
@ Finnie
Have you considered taking to dealers? If its under warranty.

I bought mine 4 months ago, I am getting slight stammering or clattering noise from the driver side door when I do above 100 kmph.

I have to pay a visit to dealer.

Sent from my GT-I9506 using AULRO mobile app

Phideaux
4th January 2015, 08:41 PM
The Evoque is 'mostly Freelander' underneath
(The car to be 'seen in' instead of 'see out of')
The new 'Discovery Sport' starts with the same engines (more & different to come) and I think the front suspension is the same; the rear suspension has had some serious design magic applied.
Effectively they're still building new with a significant percentage of the old parts bin.

Hoges
4th January 2015, 11:12 PM
The Evoque is 'mostly Freelander' underneath
(The car to be 'seen in' instead of 'see out of')
The new 'Discovery Sport' starts with the same engines (more & different to come) and I think the front suspension is the same; the rear suspension has had some serious design magic applied.
Effectively they're still building new with a significant percentage of the old parts bin.

I've seen several Evoques on the road... what with "privacy glass" and tiny windows... damned if I can see anybody inside!

I am somewhat interested in the so-called Discovery Sport... it's had reasonable write-ups in the European press...then again I might just do the usual but this time look for a well cared for used petrol D3 or D4... the price gap to the diesel variant and the added cost of a probable transmission rebuild buys a lot of petrol at 3-4L/100km consumption difference! Besides, people now designing the latest "curvaceous" models obviously do not live with them them every day or use them for practical purposes... long live the slab sided box!

Petesfree2
5th January 2015, 06:43 AM
I've seen several Evoques on the road... what with "privacy glass" and tiny windows... damned if I can see anybody inside!

I am somewhat interested in the so-called Discovery Sport... it's had reasonable write-ups in the European press...then again I might just do the usual but this time look for a well cared for used petrol D3 or D4... the price gap to the diesel variant and the added cost of a probable transmission rebuild buys a lot of petrol at 3-4L/100km consumption difference! Besides, people now designing the latest "curvaceous" models obviously do not live with them them every day or use them for practical purposes... long live the slab sided box!
Could not agree more Hoges!

Lightwater
5th January 2015, 03:06 PM
Also agree.

My almost 2 decade old car needed to be replaced. It was from the less rounded period as well.

One of the reasons for buying a Freelander, but further down the list of priorities was the squarer shape.

Phideaux
6th January 2015, 06:08 AM
Discovery Sport does look good on paper/youtube. It has all the 'good' things from Freelander2 plus 2 more seats & cunning rear suspension, and a few more evolutionary improvements.

(I'm not aware of diesel = transmission problems in D3, D4, but): Sis and Bro-in-law got a D4(or late D3) 2.7L diesel (replaced old TD5) and utterly love it.

I keep hearing about the D3 V8 "it's not so much that it's thirsty, but that you actually want!! to put your foot down!" (then they wince at the pumps).

260DET
12th January 2015, 08:40 AM
Doesn't the Evoque have a lower torque engine than the FL2? It seems to me that a lot of manufactures limit the torque output of their diesels in order to use a lower rated (cheaper) transmission. Far as I'm concerned any mid sized four cylinder SUV with under 400nm is off the shopping list.

Lightwater
12th January 2015, 05:25 PM
A family member has an Evoque SD4 2.2 litre agricultural engine 140 kW 420 Mn. I have the Si4 2.0 litre city engine 177 kW 340 Nm in my Freelander. Nothing wrong with either. My preference was petrol and I feel the 340 Nm performance is more than adequate. The good thing with the either engine is they have a broad band of power and torque.

Some manufactures might have numbers that look good on paper. But the rpm and torque is in such a narrow band the engines are as useless as a one legged man in an ar-- kicking competition.

One of the manufactures has an engine that falls short by 600 rpm. So can't reach the kWs published as the engine is already at the red line.

Phideaux
12th January 2015, 09:32 PM
Torque drop-off is a bit noticeable on overtakes in my FL2 TD4 (110kw/420Nm) - above 3000 rpm. I find I use the 'sport' function on the auto to choose a higher gear (eg, 4th instead of 3rd) to get back into the torque-band and swifter response. It bothers me that the new 'Ingenium' motors are less torquey (but wonderfully economical & clean); and this when it's not hard to find a chip-conversion that will take the current ('Peugeot?') motor to 170kw/500nm.