PDA

View Full Version : Useless Stats - existance of Santa



Surferjim
20th December 2004, 11:41 AM
Overcome by boredom, temporarily relieved by the caption comp and the jokes page (I'll tack a few on there in a minute), I thought I'd have a go at the Useless Stats thread, where you should post a useless bit of trivia that may come up in a quiz night, and stand back and watch it be torn to threads by those who have done it / got the T-Shirt AND the bumper sticker etc etc etc.

Here goes with a nice seasonal one:
NB: If you are still placing carrots and brandy next to the fireplace and have oversize socks that are magically filled with everyting K-Mart sells for under a fiver once a year, look away now.....

The Physics of Santa and His Reindeer


No known species of reindeer can fly. BUT there are 300,000 species of living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only Santa has ever seen.

There are two billion children (persons under 18) in the world. BUT since Santa doesn't appear to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist children, that reduces the workload to 15% of the total — 378 million according to Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that's 91.8 million homes. One presumes there's at least one good child in each.



Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 822.6 visits per second.

This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back into the sleigh and move on to the next house. Assuming that each of these 91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false but for the purposes of our calculations we will accept), we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75½ million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least once every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc.

This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second - a conventional reindeer can run, tops, 15 miles per hour.

If every one of the 91.8 million homes with good children were to put out a single chocolate chip cookie and an 8 ounce glass of 2% milk, the total calories (needless to say other vitamins and minerals) would be approximately 225 calories (100 for the cookie, give or take, and 125 for the milk, give or take). Multiplying the number of calories per house by the number of homes (225 x 91.8 x 1000000), we get the total number of calories Santa consumes that night, which is 20,655,000,000 calories. To break it down further, 1 pound is equal to 3500 calories. Dividing our total number of calories by the number of calories in a pound (20655000000/3500) and we get the number of pounds Santa gains, 5901428.6, which is 2950.7 tons.

The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight. On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that "flying reindeer" (see above) could pull TEN TIMES the normal amount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even nine. We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload (not even counting the weight of the sleigh) - to 353,430 tons. Again, for comparison - this is four times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth. 353,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance - this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second. Each.

In short, they will burst into flame almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team will be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second. Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500.06 times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force.

In conclusion: If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he's dead now.

incisor
20th December 2004, 01:06 PM
there an echo in here


and a chair as well

Surferjim
20th December 2004, 02:37 PM
Errr - yes, I think there is an echo - 14 views and no postings............I'll get my coat.............


TAXI!!!!

Redback
20th December 2004, 03:49 PM
<span style="color:red"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%">HELLO</span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%">HELLO</span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%">HELLO</span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%">HELLO</span><span style="font-size:36pt;line-height:100%">HELLO</span></span>

Yep there is 8O :roll:

Surferjim
20th December 2004, 03:54 PM
I have been told that a duck's quack doesn't echo [clings on to gilmer of hope]


So <span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%">QUACK</span>

See - I knew it

medic455
20th December 2004, 09:00 PM
Hmmm - very interesting.....but how about this?

*REMEMBER THIS AT CHRISTMAS TIME

According to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, while both male and female reindeer grow antlers in the summer each year, male reindeer drop their antlers at the beginning of winter, usually late November to mid-December. Female reindeer retain their antlers till after they give birth in the spring.

Therefore, according to EVERY historical rendition depicting Santa's reindeer, EVERY single one of them, from Rudolph to Blitzen, had to be a girl.

We should've known... ONLY women would be able to drag a fat-ass man in a red velvet suit all around the world in one night and not get lost.*

Merry Christmas
Mrs Medic
style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif

bigbugga
20th December 2004, 09:07 PM
8O MEDIC, quick she has hijacked your system and is spreading nasty lie's



I think 8O

medic455
20th December 2004, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by bigbugga
8O MEDIC, quick she has hijacked your system and is spreading nasty lie's



I think 8O

First point. you are right ...... give them an inch and they think they are a ruler style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif

second point. style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif ... you, think... style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif :twisted:

Pedro_The_Swift
20th December 2004, 09:35 PM
Originally posted by medic455


We should've known... ONLY women would be able to drag a fat-ass man in a red velvet suit all around the world in one night and not get lost.*

Merry Christmas
Mrs Medic
style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif

Please note the asterisk----

This denotes the model mentioned is the EUROPEAN model and therefore is unavailable in Australia.


8O :wink: style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif

p38arover
21st December 2004, 02:32 AM
Originally posted by Surferjim
I have been told that a duck's quack doesn't echo [clings on to gilmer of hope]

"gilmer"?

Ron

harry
21st December 2004, 05:42 AM
Originally posted by p38arover+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(p38arover)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Surferjim
I have been told that a duck's quack doesn't echo [clings on to gilmer of hope]

"gilmer"?

Ron[/b][/quote]
8) 'gilmer' from the verb 'gilmerize'
meaning 'to gil' a surferjim typo which causes an erratic reaction when the fingers get close to the keys 'm' and 'l'
as in the noun 'congmolerate'

and i also know of the echo to which inc refers.
well inc'd.

so inc, how does one print the above echo to throw on the lunchroom table without missing out on the right side of the missive?

Surferjim
21st December 2004, 07:07 AM
deleted

Surferjim
21st December 2004, 07:08 AM
Yeah, - like wot he sayd. style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif

Gilmer = metaphor for hope, traditionally for the lovelorn stemming from the US Journo Elizabeth Gilmer (1870 - 1951) 8)

Hence, Gilmer of "hope" - my mistake was merely a capital letter - but that is probrably what you were refering to..............?

incisor
21st December 2004, 07:46 AM
Originally posted by harry
so inc, how does one print the above echo to throw on the lunchroom table without missing out on the right side of the missive?

you need a smight gilmer of slope!

and a few whiskeys style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif

incisor
21st December 2004, 08:58 AM
Originally posted by harry
so inc, how does one print the above echo to throw on the lunchroom table without missing out on the right side of the missive?

been giving this much more serious thought young harry...

and after trying to wend my way thru the obfuscation and perilously obtuse opprobrium of grammar at hand, i have come to the ratiocination that an echo can never be missive, as it is always past tense....

8O