Spotted derelict 80"

[goingbush]

Possibly been discovered / posted on here before but found this poor looking abandoned 80" yesterday. Quite restorable, Good chassis & bulkhead

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/178.jpg

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/179.jpg

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/180.jpg
cool Landrover sign

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/181.jpg

valve car radio !!! (out of focus) and all instruments are there, also has spade type seat backs

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/167.jpg
exhaust on right side shows its must have the wrong engine,
perhaps a 2 1/4 ? radiator is in orig position

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/182.jpg

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/183.jpg
original cast badge and D-lights on both sides - what a gem !!

[Aaron IIA]

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2014/09/167.jpg
exhaust on right side shows its must have the wrong engine,
perhaps a 2 1/4 ? radiator is in orig position

The manifolds on a Land Rover 2 1/4 engine are on the left side of the car. Same with Holden six, so not this either.
Aaron

[B.S.F.]

Looks like the same 80". I took this picture last February. .W.

[Dinty]

And even though I had never seen it before, I would say your absolutely right, anyway thanks for sharing the images with us cheers Dennis :angel:
ps I wonder why it hasn't been claimed by someone,,.

[LoveB]

So where is it? Lol

[digger]

Love the sunvisor!

actually thats a great car all round.

[B.S.F.]

So where is it? Lol

Sorry, not possible as I published the picture without the owner's consent. Thats why I included my car in the photo. .W.

[isuzurover]

Sorry, not possible as I published the picture without the owner's consent. Thats why I included my car in the photo. .W.

???

Why are you suggesting that consent is needed?

[B.S.F.]

???

Why are you suggesting that consent is needed?
I didn't say it was needed; just respecting other peoples property I guess. .W.

[Lotz-A-Landies]

???

Why are you suggesting that consent is needed?
If you are taking photos on private property and the owner instructs you not to take photos or not to publish photos you would be committing an offence of trespass if you took the photos or published the photos in contravention of the property owner's instruction.

No it wouldn't be an invasion of privacy or a breach of copyright, because in Australia we don't have a bill of rights and copyright is retained by the photographer or the photographer's employer (contract dependant).

[Orkney 90]

The important question is whether the current owner is willing to sell? And if so, how to get in contact with him / her?