View Full Version : Td6 gearbox question
careyba
30th November 2014, 07:24 AM
I guys,
I have had my 2004 range now for about a year and put 12000 km on it no problems. As luck would have it, we are currently touring Tassie and so far the car is going well. However, last night when descending slowly down a hill, I noticed that when I depressed the accelerator, the engine revved but no speed. It felt like the box was in neutral.
After 5-10 seconds, I regained the ability to drive and all was good. There was no clunk and there are no warnings on the dash at all. This is the first strange gearbox related issue I have had to date. The car has just clocked 140,000km.
We still have 2 weeks of touring left. Tassie is small which is good but we are pulling a camper and still need to get back to Coffs Harbour.
Reading the forum posts, it seems that the issue is pressure related on the torque converter lockup plate. My question is, am I better off driving around in sports mode until I get home. Does this stop the lockup clutch from engaging and will it in any way prevent the box blowing as quickly.
This is the only misstep the box has made but reading others stories and given the km, I am not hopeful that it has long to go!
Cheers, Brad.
Pedro_The_Swift
30th November 2014, 07:29 AM
last time the auto was serviced?
can you check the fluid level?
still in doubt?
Go see Justin!:D
careyba
30th November 2014, 08:58 AM
I had the transmission serviced probably 5000 km ago. I did see Justin's name on the forum as a good guy in Tassie so it is nice to know someone can fix it if required
33chinacars
30th November 2014, 10:33 AM
That's how mine started to go. Don't think service would have saved mine. Get it looked at quickly. Before it goes on a holiday on its own . Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
Gary
careyba
30th November 2014, 02:58 PM
Given a new gearbox will probably set me back 7k or so, I am wondering if it is worth going for a newer v8 diesel and trading this in before the box starts playing up for real. Has anyone here had a chance to compare the two?
I have the bluefin chip in mine and the power is fine mostly, though it does labour up hills with a camper on the back. The newer v8s seem to run at around $50k for similar miles as mine. Is it that much a better car or am I better off fixing mine if performance is similar.
I have about 2000km still to do this trip. Today the car ran fine without a single hiccup so I am hoping it will finish the trip.
PhilipA
30th November 2014, 03:48 PM
In your case I would sell it quickly as from earlier posts , repairs have been unsatisfactory and led to a round robin of repair /failure etc.
It's hard to accept that Land Rover have not been forced to have a recall on these as it seems that just about every one fails at less than 160Kk.
Regards Philip A
careyba
30th November 2014, 05:00 PM
Is the repair really that unsuccessful? In the end, if the unit is pretty much replaced with an as new unit and all lines etc flushed etc, you should get another 100+ km (which for me is 8 years driving)
Homestar
30th November 2014, 06:41 PM
A cheap repair will cause issues again, but if you do it right, it will live a long and happy life. That would include a brand new valve body - which are available from Rhys at Furious Performance. Budget at least $7K, possibly up to $9K depending on what needs to be done.
If it is within your means to trade in and upgrade, that isn't a bad idea.
justinc
30th November 2014, 06:51 PM
Happy to have a squiz and assess the situation, we are VERY busy so get in touch asap if you need me to have a look. 62291102 (bh).
Jc
chaybra
1st December 2014, 12:40 PM
I guys,
I have had my 2004 range now for about a year and put 12000 km on it no problems. As luck would have it, we are currently touring Tassie and so far the car is going well. However, last night when descending slowly down a hill, I noticed that when I depressed the accelerator, the engine revved but no speed. It felt like the box was in neutral.
After 5-10 seconds, I regained the ability to drive and all was good. There was no clunk and there are no warnings on the dash at all. This is the first strange gearbox related issue I have had to date. The car has just clocked 140,000km.
We still have 2 weeks of touring left. Tassie is small which is good but we are pulling a camper and still need to get back to Coffs Harbour.
Reading the forum posts, it seems that the issue is pressure related on the torque converter lockup plate. My question is, am I better off driving around in sports mode until I get home. Does this stop the lockup clutch from engaging and will it in any way prevent the box blowing as quickly.
This is the only misstep the box has made but reading others stories and given the km, I am not hopeful that it has long to go!
Cheers, Brad.
Light acceleration while traveling down a hill and hearing nothing but revs sounds like normal automatic gearbox operation to me. My assumption is that the box has probably selected 2nd or 3rd (Depends on speed) and the lockup clutch hasn't engages to allow for an compression braking free roll down the hill. The revving would just be the engine trying to catch up to the gear speed.
Again just my understanding on how the automatics work. Could be stuffed hahaha, but we hope not
careyba
1st December 2014, 05:46 PM
I have done another few hundred km since this and not a hint of an issue. No strange sounds and perfect operation.
I have been running the box in sport mode when towing the trailer as I believe (someone please correct me if I am wrong) that this keeps the lockup clutch disengaged. Plus, this gives me plenty of extra power for hills (of which there are crap loads in Tassie!).
I have been checking car sales for the v8 diesel. There is certainly a price jump but there are a few low km ones (under 100,000km) around the 2009 compliance period for about $60k. I should be able to get $30k ish for mine, add $9k to the bucket for the gearbox I will need to do in the future. Just have to come up with $20k extra.
chaybra
2nd December 2014, 08:54 AM
I have done another few hundred km since this and not a hint of an issue. No strange sounds and perfect operation.
I have been running the box in sport mode when towing the trailer as I believe (someone please correct me if I am wrong) that this keeps the lockup clutch disengaged. Plus, this gives me plenty of extra power for hills (of which there are crap loads in Tassie!).
I have been checking car sales for the v8 diesel. There is certainly a price jump but there are a few low km ones (under 100,000km) around the 2009 compliance period for about $60k. I should be able to get $30k ish for mine, add $9k to the bucket for the gearbox I will need to do in the future. Just have to come up with $20k extra.
The lock up clutch is what you want to engage. The slip from the clutch is what will cause excess heat and wear that will end up causing the valve body to fail.
When towing, try and try again to keep it above 80kph (Where legally possible) to keep the clutch engaged, 4th and 5th gear will remain locked and produce no slip at this speed. So best put it in manual when on the highway and keep it out of third.
The eco tune for the gear box will change the lock up speed down to 40kph i think, or something around that. I will be getting one soon to try and save my clutch as much as I can.
careyba
2nd December 2014, 04:10 PM
Where do you get this Eco tune from? Is it a new program for the gearbox ECU?
In terms of the clutch, I was under the impression that when it is not engaged, it isn't slipping as such bit the fluid in the torque converter was being used to drive the gearbox (viscous coupling if you like). By leaving the lockup disengaged, there is no wear on the clutch (but more heat generated in the box from the fluid).
I am no auto trans expert however!
PhilipA
2nd December 2014, 08:24 PM
In terms of the clutch, I was under the impression that when it is not engaged, it isn't slipping as such bit the fluid in the torque converter was being used to drive the gearbox (viscous coupling if you like). By leaving the lockup disengaged, there is no wear on the clutch (but more heat generated in the box from the fluid).
The situation is the opposite of what you ( I think) have written above.
The only slip in an auto is in the TC and when it is slipping it is generating heat.
When the TC clutch engages, the drive becomes direct through the planetary gears in the gearbox and there is no heating of the fluid by the slipping action of the torque converter. .
Thus the transmission runs cooler.
You should always aim for TC lock up particularly if towing.
If you cannot get it in 5th then manually select 4th and there should be a speed where it locks.
However it is my understanding only from threads on this forum , that this is not the main problem with the transmission which is a GM transmission.
The main problem is that the valve body material is soft and is worn away by the fluid action with normal operation and that almost all fail before 160KK.
GM uses this transmission in the Commodore high output V6 and they have revised fluids many times trying to fix the problem.
There is a discussion here and if you google you will find a lot of commentary.
Auto gearbox problem (http://www.rangerovers.net/forum/6-range-rover-mark-iii-l322/47979-auto-gearbox-problem.html)
Regards Philip A
chaybra
3rd December 2014, 10:52 AM
The situation is the opposite of what you ( I think) have written above.
The only slip in an auto is in the TC and when it is slipping it is generating heat.
When the TC clutch engages, the drive becomes direct through the planetary gears in the gearbox and there is no heating of the fluid by the slipping action of the torque converter. .
Thus the transmission runs cooler.
You should always aim for TC lock up particularly if towing.
If you cannot get it in 5th then manually select 4th and there should be a speed where it locks.
However it is my understanding only from threads on this forum , that this is not the main problem with the transmission which is a GM transmission.
The main problem is that the valve body material is soft and is worn away by the fluid action with normal operation and that almost all fail before 160KK.
GM uses this transmission in the Commodore high output V6 and they have revised fluids many times trying to fix the problem.
There is a discussion here and if you google you will find a lot of commentary.
Auto gearbox problem (http://www.rangerovers.net/forum/6-range-rover-mark-iii-l322/47979-auto-gearbox-problem.html)
Regards Philip A
Yep indeed, however I dare say that the material coming from the delaminating clutch most likely causes the pre mature wear. Sensible driving (let the clutch lock as much as you can), oil/filter maintenance and doing a TC swat at 150k will and has proven to a long gearbox life.
Contamination is nearly always the source of pre mature failure in hydraulic systems.
The eco tune will help reduce the contamination.
If you search the forums or even google you can come up with the German site, google translate will be needed.
careyba
3rd December 2014, 08:14 PM
Another question then on the rebuild, what is the benefit of a "preemptive" rebuild as opposed to waiting until the box completely dies. Do you save any money this way or is it just a piece of mind thing.
Also, I noticed on another forum here that there is a newer type of TC that has been made available recently. Has anyone tried this and is it worth a go?
chaybra
4th December 2014, 01:57 PM
Another question then on the rebuild, what is the benefit of a "preemptive" rebuild as opposed to waiting until the box completely dies. Do you save any money this way or is it just a piece of mind thing.
Also, I noticed on another forum here that there is a newer type of TC that has been made available recently. Has anyone tried this and is it worth a go?
No on the PM rebuild for the box itself. Best money spent is on the TC and if the newer type of TC you are talking about is a heavy duty type one with different clutch material? Then yes, that is what I have fitted. no faults and no slip in 4th or 5th (Full lock up), I was towing an obscurely overloaded trailer from brisbane to melbourne and foot hard down in 4th at about 83kph up a very very steep hill it held up fabulously. this is 20k after it was installed.
careyba
8th December 2014, 07:15 PM
Well, spending the last week looking at possible upgrades to my TD6 before the box goes, I have narrowed down to either a tdv8 or a 4.2 supercharged model.
The diesel is obviously better in fuel. However, it is an expensive and complex engine that is not without faults.
The 4.2 is not great on fuel but seems to be quite reliable and was the top of the range so has all the extras. I do about 12000 km per year, part hwy and part city. I expect the extra fuel will be about $600-700 per year ($15 a week).
The models I have found are around the same age (2008), the diesels seem to gave 90-100k on the clock and the 4.2 between 60-70. Both I expect I could get for $55-60k (petrol probably $50k if I push).
Any thoughts from guys on here who may have gone through the same mental gymnastics?
careyba
13th December 2014, 08:09 AM
The decision has been made to keep the TD6 and fix the box.
I have a question now on the best torque converter to use with the box. I have found through the forums a brand called "Roadblaster" who do a heavy duty converter.
Has anyone fitted one of these and are they worth it?
Also, is it worth going the lower speed lockup and what benefits/drawbacks are associated with a lower speed lockup?
Cheers, Brad.
jsp
13th December 2014, 06:17 PM
Has anyone fitted one of these and are they worth it?
Also, is it worth going the lower speed lockup and what benefits/drawbacks are associated with a lower speed lockup?
Cheers, Brad.
I had my TC rebuilt at a place in Melb who use some special carbon fiber tough clutch stuff of some sort, meant to be 3 times better than OEM, time will tell. I don't know the exact place I can't find the paperwork, was done back in Feb. I have nearly 16,000K's on it since.
They asked me if I wanted it to have a lower stall speed, in terms of RPM, and that they did it by % and could go upto 50% less, after reading here and asking about I opted for 15% less.
Its all very subjective, but now it feels like the car will happily stay locked up when you coast back down to 50 from 60, and providing you softly accelerate it will stay locked when you go back up in speed, whereas before the kickdown was even at slightest press of throttle.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.