View Full Version : TDV8 Egr map out and remap 2010 TDV8
Blade74
28th July 2015, 07:40 AM
I'm really wanting to get the EGR system mapped out on my 2010 TDV8 3.6.
Has anyone had this done and by whom?
Have many people had their car remapped and what the the positives/negatives.
I don't tend to drive my cars like I stole them so I'm interested in the gains off idle and midrange in the power curve and general fuel economy.
I have a iid tool on the way in the post if this helps with remote remaps?
BigJon
28th July 2015, 01:14 PM
I haven't checked for a while, but I am not sure that you can do anything to the EGRs in the TDV8. I think BAS would be one of the best places to get a remap.
BAS Performance Remaps. Landrover tuning at its best! (http://bellautoservices.co.uk/)
Laurie
28th July 2015, 02:24 PM
Blade
Have a read of this thread !!!
fullfatrr.com - View topic - 3.6 TDV8 EGR options? (http://www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic26886.html)
Laurie
CSBrisie
28th July 2015, 04:59 PM
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2015/07/121.jpg (http://s12.photobucket.com/user/mundayc/media/ge%20Rover%20Vogue%20MY12/dynomap_zpsv6rhxdl5.jpeg.html)
Had Roo Systems in Brisbane do an ECU remap (237HP increased to 290Hp at wheels) and twin 3 inch exhaust on my 4.4TDV8. I'll find the before and after dyno tune maps and add them, but it certainly is more responsive and has a sensational exhaust note when, umm, flattened...
Blade74
28th July 2015, 09:23 PM
Thanks guys,
I did email a few companies in the UK this morning. BAS was one of them.
Pete from BAS is the only one whose responded and I'm now discussing the options via email.
The egr can definitely be mapped out by them and blanking isn't required.
I did read that post on FULLFATRR only yesterday.
Was just wondering what people here in Australia were doing.
And what opinions on AULRO were?
austeve01
29th July 2015, 05:14 PM
Thanks guys,
I did email a few companies in the UK this morning. BAS was one of them.
Pete from BAS is the only one whose responded and I'm now discussing the options via email.
The egr can definitely be mapped out by them and blanking isn't required.
I did read that post on FULLFATRR only yesterday.
Was just wondering what people here in Australia were doing.
And what opinions on AULRO were?
Another one you may like to look at is the Bluefin Superchip. Details can be found at tigersoft.com.au
I have the Bluefin remap on my D3 ... it is impressive.
Cheers
Steve
Blade74
29th July 2015, 05:15 PM
Ok so I have now rung Pete from BAS and confirmed that to do the egr you have to map it out and physical modify the egr to be blocked.
Quite a bit of work I guess.
If it was just mapped out you couldn't guarantee that the valves were 100% blocked physically.
Eg a valve might be partially stuck open.
Hmmm might have to look at a map only from BAS and do it through my iid Tool BT.
rar110
29th July 2015, 07:08 PM
Ok so I have now rung Pete from BAS and confirmed that to do the egr you have to map it out and physical modify the egr to be blocked. Quite a bit of work I guess. If it was just mapped out you couldn't guarantee that the valves were 100% blocked physically. Eg a valve might be partially stuck open. Hmmm might have to look at a map only from BAS and do it through my iid Tool BT.
I going to keep the EGRs and use Revive treatment to reduce soot build up in the EGR, turbo and manifold. I've used it on both my RRV and Peugeot diesel which resulted in improved performance.
Blade74
29th July 2015, 10:59 PM
I agree Rar110.
I just had a service done on mine a week ago with Graeme Cooper and asked them to do an EGR clean.
Not sure what product they used but they seemed happy to do it and recommended it.
Car has 72000kms on it.
But yes I think a treatment every so often might be the way to go.
I changed the oil filter, oil, air filter and Graeme Cooper did the transmission oil, diff oils, transfer case oil and EGR clean.
The car fuel economy has definitely gotten better.
Probably a combination of everything but I reckon the egr clean probably made the biggest impact. Just my assumption.
PantherPeople
18th August 2015, 07:59 AM
Any update on the ECU remapping?
I am currently looking into it for my 2013 Defender 90, just to increase some highway mileage. Ive also got a Patriot roof rack going on next week, which I assume will suck a bit more out of the tank as well!!
I've seen RooSystems vids on YouTube, but wanted to know if there were any other / better / more effective options out there?
Will ask the boys at the local British Off Road as well..
Laurie
18th August 2015, 11:24 AM
Did anyone contact "Davis Performance Landys" about the EGR blanking etc ? I would suspect that they would probably be workshop that could do it safely if possible.
Laurie
Blade74
5th January 2016, 11:09 PM
Ok so I've finally bit the bullet and ordered the BAS remap for my 3.6 TDV8 vogue.
After paying online I had the map ready for installation all within an hour.
Very speedy service by pete.
So it's very late now and I will install it in the morning.
Will keep you posted as to how it goes.
I've purchased it for better low down power and less sluggishness. Not for speed or driving like a maniac.
Blade74
6th January 2016, 09:44 AM
I loaded the remap this morning and also reset the auto transmission at the same time as requested by Pete.
The car initially seems to have a little more pull just of idle and quite a bit more in the midrange.
I'll test it more over the coming weeks and report back.
harlie
6th January 2016, 10:14 AM
There is a good argument for a catch can. The problem with EGR is that the soot mixes with the oil from the crank case vent. A catch can is installed inline to remove the oil, resulting in only EGR soot being routed to the inlet. Without the oil, the soot is less likely to form a think gunk.
There are some claiming that an open EGR increases engine/exhaust temps, from my research and testing this is incorrect.
Research I've been doing for the VAG side of my garage has told a different side of this story. There is a case for EGR to remain in the later engines as the introduction of exhaust gas into the inlet is primarily to reduce NOx - however this is achieved by reducing the % of fresh air the engine consumes which reduces combustion temps because the oxygen level is lower, this is despite sucking in warm exhaust gas (it is warm not hot as it goes through the EGR cooler). We have confirmed this theory in the 2.0tdi VWs and what it shows is a significant increase in average and max EGTs (hitting 850degC) when the EGR is blocked off, reportedly enough to cause turbo failure. It is to the point that no tuners will tune out the EGR in the later VAG diesels (they are still doing it for the older 1.9 which is a very under stressed engine, down on power and torque by some 45% compared to the 170 2.0). Using what I can only describe as the best diagnostic system I've come across, we can see when the EGR opens and the result is an immediate reduction in EGT.
The increase in combustion temp is seen as such a risk that VAG engineers have the EGR default to open if it is unplugged - tested and confirmed.
The EGR has such an effect on combustion temps that it is also used for active maintenance of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Now DPF is not of interest to the L322 community as we are lucky enough not to have them, however it does demonstrate how the EGR is used to regulate combustion temps. The follow points are copied from the VW tech training on DPF and descried what the engine ECU does to increase EGTs to 500-650degC during idle!!! Unfortunately the diagrams don't want to copy.
● exhaust gas recirculation is switched off to raise the combustion temperature,
● an extended injection period is initiated, after a period of main injection with reduced quantity at 35deg crankshaft angle after TDC, in order to increase the exhaust gas temperature,
● the supply of intake air is regulated by an electric throttle valve and
● the charge air pressure is adapted so that the torque during regeneration does not change noticeably by the driver.
So, it closes EGR, and by over fuelling and blocking air it creates a super-rich mix. It actually does a pretty good job at hiding the process from the driver, only thing I notice is that it is holding each gear a bit longer, and if you switch off when it's halfway done you can smell the heat, and the fans run for a good 10 minutes to cool the engine bay (DPF is just in front of the firewall up quite high) Back on track - the important point for this discussion is that the first thing it does is close (block) the EGR to increase combustion temps. And from what I can see during road testing, it is nearly the only time the EGR is fully closed.
All my testing has been conducted on VAG vehicles, and has achieved the exact same results as the tests carried out by the local go faster shop. Given that our RRs are running bosch/siemans engine management which is the same as what VAG run, I can't see that they would be any different.
Back to my original point, sorry got a bit side tracked. Installing a good catch can like the Provent 200 or the 43Draft Designs unit would remove the oil from the inlet, greatly reducing the build-up of crud. BTW, don't bother with a cheap ebay can, they don't vaporise enough oil.
Those of us with TD6 have removed the EGR, now there is just oil, similar result - without soot, the oil shouldn't create gunk. However, on a side note after the install of the cyclonic oil separator the volume of oil from the CC is making me think about catching it...
Blade74
6th January 2016, 10:22 AM
Thanks for all the detail on EGR Harlie. BAS hasn't removed any egr on my TDV8 remap. They have left it alone. But what your saying makes sense. My last TD5 had the rocker cover vented to atmosphere....dde31dde33 So the oil vapor never went into the intake prior to the turbo and egr was blocked off. I think I'll leave the egr alone on this car and try and do regular cleaning of it (every year) It would be good to vent the rocker cover fumes to a provent but I have no idea how or where his would fit on my motor. There's pipes and things going everywhere.
rar110
6th January 2016, 01:19 PM
Here's the crankcase ventilation diagram from the workshop manual p 1604.
103914
rar110
6th January 2016, 01:42 PM
Here's the EGR diagram.
103917
harlie
6th January 2016, 03:20 PM
Are they really small jpg or am I doing something wrong?:angel:
Graeme
6th January 2016, 03:43 PM
So, it closes EGR, and by over fuelling and blocking air it creates a super-rich mix.LR workshop manuals describe the same process but the reason for closing the EGR valve is to prevent fuel and air-rich exhaust gases being returned to the combustion chamber so that those exhaust gases get to and burn in the catalytic converter to generate enough heat to burn out the DPF. The cats are run at their maximum possible temperature and to get that hot the exhaust gases need to have fuel and oxygen to burn. The after-burning starts in the exhaust manifold due to fuel injected too late to combust properly which is why the EGTs, measured at the manifold, get so high.
I suspect that turners are no longer closing EGR valves because of the recently introduced large penalties in Europe for interfering with emissions systems.
rar110
6th January 2016, 03:47 PM
Are they really small jpg or am I doing something wrong?:angel:
Sorry about that. I'm not sure why. Maybe because I did it from my phone. I'll try again on the computer later.
rar110
6th January 2016, 09:58 PM
Disregard the above diagrams as your right Blade, you can't see the EGRs or crankcase ventilation parts. Here's a pic of the oil filter, the ventilation is just to the rear (above), somewhere.
103945
rar110
18th February 2016, 09:56 PM
There is a good argument for a catch can. The problem with EGR is that the soot mixes with the oil from the crank case vent. A catch can is installed inline to remove the oil, resulting in only EGR soot being routed to the inlet. Without the oil, the soot is less likely to form a think gunk. There are some claiming that an open EGR increases engine/exhaust temps, from my research and testing this is incorrect. Research I've been doing for the VAG side of my garage has told a different side of this story. There is a case for EGR to remain in the later engines as the introduction of exhaust gas into the inlet is primarily to reduce NOx - however this is achieved by reducing the % of fresh air the engine consumes which reduces combustion temps because the oxygen level is lower, this is despite sucking in warm exhaust gas (it is warm not hot as it goes through the EGR cooler). We have confirmed this theory in the 2.0tdi VWs and what it shows is a significant increase in average and max EGTs (hitting 850degC) when the EGR is blocked off, reportedly enough to cause turbo failure. It is to the point that no tuners will tune out the EGR in the later VAG diesels (they are still doing it for the older 1.9 which is a very under stressed engine, down on power and torque by some 45% compared to the 170 2.0). Using what I can only describe as the best diagnostic system I've come across, we can see when the EGR opens and the result is an immediate reduction in EGT. The increase in combustion temp is seen as such a risk that VAG engineers have the EGR default to open if it is unplugged - tested and confirmed. The EGR has such an effect on combustion temps that it is also used for active maintenance of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Now DPF is not of interest to the L322 community as we are lucky enough not to have them, however it does demonstrate how the EGR is used to regulate combustion temps. The follow points are copied from the VW tech training on DPF and descried what the engine ECU does to increase EGTs to 500-650degC during idle!!! Unfortunately the diagrams don't want to copy. ● exhaust gas recirculation is switched off to raise the combustion temperature, ● an extended injection period is initiated, after a period of main injection with reduced quantity at 35deg crankshaft angle after TDC, in order to increase the exhaust gas temperature, ● the supply of intake air is regulated by an electric throttle valve and ● the charge air pressure is adapted so that the torque during regeneration does not change noticeably by the driver. So, it closes EGR, and by over fuelling and blocking air it creates a super-rich mix. It actually does a pretty good job at hiding the process from the driver, only thing I notice is that it is holding each gear a bit longer, and if you switch off when it's halfway done you can smell the heat, and the fans run for a good 10 minutes to cool the engine bay (DPF is just in front of the firewall up quite high) Back on track - the important point for this discussion is that the first thing it does is close (block) the EGR to increase combustion temps. And from what I can see during road testing, it is nearly the only time the EGR is fully closed. All my testing has been conducted on VAG vehicles, and has achieved the exact same results as the tests carried out by the local go faster shop. Given that our RRs are running bosch/siemans engine management which is the same as what VAG run, I can't see that they would be any different. Back to my original point, sorry got a bit side tracked. Installing a good catch can like the Provent 200 or the 43Draft Designs unit would remove the oil from the inlet, greatly reducing the build-up of crud. BTW, don't bother with a cheap ebay can, they don't vaporise enough oil. Those of us with TD6 have removed the EGR, now there is just oil, similar result - without soot, the oil shouldn't create gunk. However, on a side note after the install of the cyclonic oil separator the volume of oil from the CC is making me think about catching it...
Harlie
Any more thoughts on the usefulness of EGRs in the tdv8s? I was resolved to do using induction cleaner every 10,000km. But I might reconsider and go for an EGR emulator or remap.
Would the crank case ventilation filter on a tdv8 do the same job as a provent do you think?
I also note from the workshop manual the crank case vents (post vent filter) to only the driver side turbo, which is next to the alternator.
harlie
19th February 2016, 09:32 AM
Hey Pete,
From the testing I have done (you've seen the wife's back Octavia VRs which is identical to a mk6 Golf GTD) I would be hesitant to remove the EGR on any engine that is running the numbers that modern diesels are running.
The TD6 is not what I class as modern diesel numbers and is really a lazy engine so we are getting away with EGR removal, even with a 510nm remap, I am not seeing the temps anywhere near what the VW engine produces when the EGR is dumbied out. There is many cases of failed turbos in the VW camp when guys have played with mappings that significantly reduce the level of EGR available to the engine. As I mentioned above, the tuning companies are now refusing to even reduce the level of EGR for the 2.0 VAG diesels, and it has NOTHING to do with emissions regulations - they are still mapping out the diesel particulate filter!!
Your 3.6 produces bigger numbers (per litre) than my VW engine (standard 125/360 from 2.0) and if you are looking at the (800nm) remaps available, that's getting into scary heat production, I would not be touching the EGR without some concrete data.
The gunk issue is a combination of EGR soot and CCV oil - remove one and the gunk no longer forms. EGR has been always looked as the source to get rid of - in the past we were not dealing with the temps and (IMO) people don't fully understand what the modern EGR is really doing in it's roll of temperature reduction (it's scary!). Way back when I got my first car (1982 model), my dad's mechanic went straight to work and closed off what was the first version of EGR in a petrol engine, with the theory that the engine runs better without the warm, low oxygen air - and he's right!However, the problem now is they run too well, and create too much heat.
The CCV filter on the engine will never remove a good portion of the oil, the simply can't - the vapour is hot at that location and if they are too restrictive the CC pressure builds up. There are two good catch cans available (many crap ones). Provent has a large filter which needs to replaced every 60-80km, the 43DD unit has no filter, it works on condensation and by all reports is the better unit. The can is placed low and as the CCV vapour passes through the can it cools enough for the oil to condensate on the plates.
I would assume you only have one CCV outlet, If it was me, I would fit a quality catch can and leave the EGR be - maybe go to the trouble of cleaning them.
As a side not - I wonder what the VNT mech on your turbos looks like. Would be interesting to look at a "failed" tdv8 turbo - if it is anything like the VW camp (same turbo manufacturer) a lot of the failed units will just need cleaning...
rar110
19th February 2016, 10:55 PM
Thanks heaps Craig, very interesting.
From the workshop manual there looks to be a place to divert CCV through a quality catch can.
I know the provent. What's the 43DD?
Graeme
20th February 2016, 05:25 AM
Would be interesting to look at a "failed" tdv8 turbo - if it is anything like the VW camp (same turbo manufacturer) a lot of the failed units will just need cleaning...From what I've seen the bearing fails, which makes me wonder if the rear sump drain plug has been removed during oil changes.
harlie
21st February 2016, 09:04 AM
Thanks heaps Craig, very interesting.
From the workshop manual there looks to be a place to divert CCV through a quality catch can.
I know the provent. What's the 43DD?
Sorry - it's 42DD
42 draft designs (http://www.42draftdesigns.com/oil-catch-cans/oil-catch-cans/)
BigJon
21st February 2016, 07:33 PM
, which makes me wonder if the rear sump drain plug has been removed during oil changes.
I remove mine at every oil change, which I do every 10 000km. Oil is cheap, engines and engine repairs are expensive!
Greg40
22nd February 2016, 11:49 AM
I have had alot to do with this problem of EGR in the induction systems and am currently doing a study at rmit on it, what we found is essentially the EGR has many uses in the engine system and should continue to operate as removing them causes alot of different issues within the engine. The way to fix the problem is regular induction cleaning. Some manufacturers do it and others are beginning to now, I believe Mazda just added it to there service schedule for the utes. So really the best option is annual or bi-annual induction cleaning which is good for the engine anyway.
I have attached a blog that talks about the tdv6, which has the same issue.
Land Rover and Jaguar TDV6 induction cleaning and maintenance - Pickards Automotive | Car Service Centre | British and European Specilists | Melbourne (http://www.pickardsautomotive.com.au/pickards-blog/land-rover-and-jaguar-tdv6-induction-cleaning-and-maintenance)
Hammer H
24th February 2016, 09:46 PM
Hi Guys,
is there anybody out there in Aus that has actually mapped out/blanked the EGRs on a 3.6 tdv8. Id be interested to hear what they can report as the results.
It seems to be the preferred way to go in the uk.
On another note, being we are in a hotter climate in Aus Id assume our egrs are in operation for a shorter duration, or have i go that wrong?
I haven't seen reports of too many turbo failures over here, or is that because we have less vehicles.
Cheers Paul
rar110
24th February 2016, 09:57 PM
Gday Paul
I haven't heard of anyone actually doing a remap here or in the UK to disable the tdv8 EGR valve. I have read about people thinking about doing it and saying its possible. The closest Ive seen is recently reading about EGR emulators being fitted to the tdv8 (and tdv6) which trick the ECU into believing the EGR is functioning normally when its actually closed.
I think after reading Harlie's posts above I will just keep using an induction cleaner every service. Additional filtering of the oil vapour feeding into the intake manifold could be another solution so oil doesn't combine with EGR soot to gum up the turbo and manifold.
Hammer H
24th February 2016, 10:05 PM
Gday Paul
I haven't heard of anyone actually doing a remap here or in the UK to disable the tdv8 EGR valve. I have read about people thinking about doing it and saying its possible. The closest Ive seen is recently reading about EGR emulators being fitted to the tdv8 (and tdv6) which trick the ECU into believing the EGR is functioning normally when its actually closed.
I think after reading Harlie's posts above I will just keep using an induction cleaner every service. Additional filtering of the oil vapour feeding into the intake manifold could be another solution so oil doesn't combine with EGR soot to gum up the turbo and manifold.
Thanks rar110
are you using this Revive Turbo Cleaner (http://www.revivemyengine.com/)
i think you have 250,000 kms im not far behind you at 240,000
Thanks Paul
Mickd
18th October 2019, 07:27 AM
I realise this is an old thread, but there was some talk of fitting an aftermarket catch can (ie. Provent) to the TDV8. Has anyone actually done this with the 3.6L? I haven't pulled the factory filter off to inspect as it is somewhat buried beneath the intake, but my thoughts were wondering about the effectiveness of the factory item vs aftermarket or combination of both. I guess using both may cause additional restriction in the breathing which could create other issues similar to a blocked CCV. Anyone with some real experience?
rar110
18th October 2019, 07:50 AM
It’s still on the cards for me. I haven’t really worked out the best way to do this.
I was looking to fit a provent to the driver side as that’s where the breather pipe is. The breather pipe slopes down the driver side of the motor to the driver side turbo.
The ideal would be to fit the provent somewhere at the top of the motor so to enable easy inspection of the filter. However that would result in the breather pipe sloping upward and collated oil flowing to a low point somewhere along the breather hose.
The other issue is getting triple jointed wrists fitted to allow me to get access to actually do this work. A more workable solution is probably removing the breather pipe and modifying on the bench and maybe fitting the provent down near the sump.
For now disabling the EGR seems to be helping enough.
rar110
18th October 2019, 07:52 AM
In case it wasn’t clear I was retaining the factor CCV filter. I don’t expect a provent to cause any restriction going on my experience with another car.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.