PDA

View Full Version : Storm clouds brewing


rfurzer
7th December 2015, 10:01 PM
The Tas motor rego department have this document about to go out to the Inspection Stations
Bearman
7th December 2015, 10:18 PM
Another example of shiny arsed bureaucrats with nothing better to do!
87County
7th December 2015, 10:25 PM
hmmm....

text reads a bit like that other person was pushing
rfurzer
7th December 2015, 10:45 PM
They have some data for the 110 giving distance from wheel centre to the arch at 560 front and 590 rear - based on civvy 110 data

Can someone put a tape measure on an unladen perentie?
Blknight.aus
7th December 2015, 11:18 PM
of all of those....

black out lights
door locks (really, door locks on a rag top?)
ignition lock mechanism
bonnet protrusions (iffy)

and from memory no requirement for VSB compliance.

and its not a defender, never was, never will be trying to pass it on defender specs will never work.
rovernutter
8th December 2015, 01:11 AM
Very strange about the ride height. How do you lower it and still maintain the GVM rating.

The door locks also seem a little pointless with a soft top.

It appears that they are working off the vehicle's VIN number that states that it is a Land Rover 110.
mick88
8th December 2015, 07:57 AM
They have some data for the 110 giving distance from wheel centre to the arch at 560 front and 590 rear - based on civvy 110 data

Can someone put a tape measure on an unladen perentie?



My FFR 490 front and 530 rear.
Axle centre to arch of the flare.




Cheers, Mick.
Homestar
8th December 2015, 09:25 AM
'Possibly' Non compliant pintle...

They don't even know does and what doesn't meet this spec and they're asking testers to ensure that it is...
Rig110
8th December 2015, 09:38 AM
Pretty sure even the 110 doesn't have an "angel of visibility"
rovernutter
8th December 2015, 10:44 AM
'Possibly' Non compliant pintle...

They don't even know does and what doesn't meet this spec and they're asking testers to ensure that it is...
They state that the pintle issue is only for those vehicles built after 07/91. I think that the reason they use "possibly" is that it seems that some have the required numbering to say that they are legal and it appears that some don't.
rfurzer
8th December 2015, 11:14 AM
Found it
Mick_Marsh
8th December 2015, 01:32 PM
The Tas motor rego department have this document about to go out to the Inspection Stations
Where did you get that? Who is it from? We need context.
rovernutter
8th December 2015, 02:30 PM
Who is it from?
It is on the bottom of each page "Created by Vehicle Registration & Standards Team"