rfurzer
2nd March 2016, 04:26 PM
I had an interesting chat to my local engineer about the fittings on the bonnet. 
Apparently anything that you couldn't roll a 100mm ball over fails some pedestrian safety test in the ADRs (haven't seen it in print meself).
If true - that would explain why the shovel holder is sometimes allowed but the windscreen props sometimes aren't.
Anyway - it needn't make actual sense. If I imagine being a pedestrian hit by a perentie, i'd expect the helicopter lift points (allowed) on the bulbar (allowed) to break my tibia and then whack my chest on the front lip of the bonnet. My head would hit the bonnet well before most of the tool-holders. If you were hit hard enough to be thrown further up the bonnet then you'd be in a pickle from the impact, never mind the windscreen props.
It seems to me that a vehicle maintained for the purpose of historic heritage should be allowed to keep them, but one intended for getting about maybe not.
The thing is the tools aren't that good - theyre all a bit short in the handle IMHO.
Apparently anything that you couldn't roll a 100mm ball over fails some pedestrian safety test in the ADRs (haven't seen it in print meself).
If true - that would explain why the shovel holder is sometimes allowed but the windscreen props sometimes aren't.
Anyway - it needn't make actual sense. If I imagine being a pedestrian hit by a perentie, i'd expect the helicopter lift points (allowed) on the bulbar (allowed) to break my tibia and then whack my chest on the front lip of the bonnet. My head would hit the bonnet well before most of the tool-holders. If you were hit hard enough to be thrown further up the bonnet then you'd be in a pickle from the impact, never mind the windscreen props.
It seems to me that a vehicle maintained for the purpose of historic heritage should be allowed to keep them, but one intended for getting about maybe not.
The thing is the tools aren't that good - theyre all a bit short in the handle IMHO.