PDA

View Full Version : Sea Shepherd



CraigE
12th January 2006, 04:34 PM
Good to see an organization that backs up their ideals with actions. Something that our navy and government should be doing. There should be no need for organizations like this to exist, but there is.

http://www.seashepherd.org

ET
12th January 2006, 04:44 PM
I am with you CraigE these guys do a great job.
Got to say I am a bit dissapointed with the number of voters though.

D110V8D
12th January 2006, 04:51 PM
Whale hunters lick balls. :evil:

disco95
12th January 2006, 04:58 PM
Save the whales man 8)

Andrewpv01
12th January 2006, 05:00 PM
Have to agree even though I am about as far from a greenie as you can get. I only eat things that aren't endangered.
And if they are fishing in Australian waters they should be sunk :twisted: :twisted:

Andrew

CraigE
12th January 2006, 05:45 PM
Andrew, I am not what you would call a greenie as most of us would not be as their general mandate is to ban everything that may endanger the environment except what they want to use or abuse. I like most genuine 4wdrivers and I could safely assume most of the members on this site, believe I am a consevationalist, look after what we have and use it in a responsible manner.
Now if they start spouting off about Kangaroos being a poor endangered species i would have something to say (more like plague proportions).
Might have to get a couple of their long sleeve t shirts though.
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/

JamesH
12th January 2006, 07:17 PM
I like whales very much and dislike countries that go whaling very much but I have an intense hatred of dopey feral dole bludging bolshie enviro peace loopies that everytime I see one or hear of one I want to find the nearest whale and stuff a cute seal puppy down its blowhole.

It's probably best for all concerned if I stay away the the politics threads.

Ace
12th January 2006, 07:25 PM
Dont like it one bit, i dont see the point in it and greenpeace should be given permission to shoot them (the whalers, not the whales). Matt

one_iota
12th January 2006, 07:33 PM
Originally posted by JamesH
I have an intense hatred of dopey feral dole bludging bolshie enviro peace loopies that everytime I see one or hear of one I want to find the nearest whale and stuff a cute seal puppy down its blowhole.


They are a very very very small minority you know.

Just as well because there would be an awful lot of seals being stuffed down whales' blowholes otherwise. https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/ https://www.aulro.com/afvb/

So don't get stressed.

As for politics the vast majority of folks in this country have mortgages (unlike whales and seals) and that's why Little Johnny is calling the shots and things pertaining to sustainability are confined to real estate.

rmp
12th January 2006, 07:42 PM
Originally posted by JamesH
I like whales very much and dislike countries that go whaling very much but I have an intense hatred of dopey feral dole bludging bolshie enviro peace loopies that everytime I see one or hear of one I want to find the nearest whale and stuff a cute seal puppy down its blowhole.

It's probably best for all concerned if I stay away the the politics threads.

No, stay involved, that's the funniest thing I've read today!!!!!!

I'm like most others, I'm all for shared, responsible use of the environment. I'd support anti-whaling movements. On the other hand if I half killed a roo on the road I'd turn round and finish it off not take it to the vet.

101RRS
12th January 2006, 09:21 PM
Originally posted by CraigE
Good to see an organization that backs up their ideals with actions. Something that our navy and government should be doing. There should be no need for organizations like this to exist, but there is.

http://www.seashepherd.org

And what do you suggest our Navy do? It is on the high seas, the whalers, I am sorry to say are operating within the resolutions of the whaling commission - while I don't like it, it is the greenies that are doing the moral but illegal actions. What if the whalers escalate - what then - or the Japanese Navy provides protection for their flag ships - what then.

Or if the whalers formally call on the nearest nation (Aust) to defend them from the pirate greenies - Aust will almost have an obligation to respond - and if we don't and a ship is lost - we can be charged for failing to render assistance when questioned

We will end up with the Cod Wars of the 60s where all of a sudden it was not only fishing boats having a go at each other - warships also get involved.

Action can only be taken by diplomatic means and through the whaling commission - this sort of action does nothing.

Garry

101RRS
12th January 2006, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by Andrewpv01

And if they are fishing in Australian waters they should be sunk :twisted: :twisted:

Andrew

They are not in Australian waters - if they were they wouldn't be whaling

one_iota
12th January 2006, 09:34 PM
Who are these so called "Greenies" anyway.

Are they the ones who suggested that fuel prices would rise?

Are they the ones who predicted global warming?

Are they the ones who stopped the damming of the Franklin and Gordon Rivers?

Are they the ones that urged the cleaning of the Thames?

Are they the ones who suggested that some more water should be returned to the Snowy River?

Are they the ones who insist that power consumption ratings are shown on washing machines etc,

Are they the ones who have suggested that we conserve water during droughts.

Are they the ones who plant trees.

WHAT HAVE THE GREENIES EVER DONE FOR US?

Sorry I was only thinking of our own extinction :oops:

I think that it was John Ruskin in the 19th Century who said that the we should leave the world better than we would wish our grand children to see it

Grizzly_Adams
12th January 2006, 09:42 PM
Originally posted by garrycol+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(garrycol)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Andrewpv01

And if they are fishing in Australian waters they should be sunk :twisted: :twisted:

Andrew

They are not in Australian waters - if they were they wouldn't be whaling[/b][/quote]

Unfortunately they are in waters that Australia has layed claim to - however there are so many claims to the waters in Antartica, and most claimants don't recognise anyone else's claims :?

Andrewpv01
12th January 2006, 09:53 PM
Originally posted by rmp+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rmp)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-JamesH
I like whales very much and dislike countries that go whaling very much but I have an intense hatred of dopey feral dole bludging bolshie enviro peace loopies that everytime I see one or hear of one I want to find the nearest whale and stuff a cute seal puppy down its blowhole.

It's probably best for all concerned if I stay away the the politics threads.

No, stay involved, that's the funniest thing I've read today!!!!!!

I'm like most others, I'm all for shared, responsible use of the environment. I'd support anti-whaling movements. On the other hand if I half killed a roo on the road I'd turn round and finish it off not take it to the vet.[/b][/quote]

I have both finished off a few roo's that I have hit and taken one to be raised by WIRES ( Joey in mothers pouch that I hit).

I agree with sustainable use of all natural resources.

I should have clarified that if any ship is whaling/fishing in Australian waters they should be sunk and their crews imprisoned for X years.

Andrew

101RRS
12th January 2006, 09:54 PM
We might have laid claim to the waters but it is not recognised by anyone else and we are not in a position to enforce that claim (it would be thrown out in the international court) and under the Antarctic Treaty to which Aust is a signatory there are no territorial or economic claims permitted.

garry

Ralph1Malph
12th January 2006, 10:17 PM
Hi all,
I think sustainable is the theme here. I don't mind eatin' any critter as long as the population is sustained and managed. If the Japs just came out and said:
"we ain't researching 'em, we're eatin' 'em and here's our sustainment management plan"
The world would be happier.
As for the Sea Shepard vessel, had a close look at it when docked in Gods toilet (Melb) a few weeks ago, real Captain Silver stuff, all black, including the flag which was black with a white logo (almost thought it was the skull and crossbones) https://www.aulro.com/afvb/
Interesting to see what would happen if they sunk one of Jap boats :roll:

Regards
Ralph

CraigE
13th January 2006, 11:03 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'>And what do you suggest our Navy do? It is on the high seas, the whalers, I am sorry to say are operating within the resolutions of the whaling commission - while I don't like it, it is the greenies that are doing the moral but illegal actions. What if the whalers escalate - what then - or the Japanese Navy provides protection for their flag ships - what then.

Or if the whalers formally call on the nearest nation (Aust) to defend them from the pirate greenies - Aust will almost have an obligation to respond - and if we don't and a ship is lost - we can be charged for failing to render assistance when questioned

We will end up with the Cod Wars of the 60s where all of a sudden it was not only fishing boats having a go at each other - warships also get involved.

Action can only be taken by diplomatic means and through the whaling commission - this sort of action does nothing.

Garry
[/b][/quote]

Garry,
They have been spotted with no dispute whaling in Australian Antarctic waters and inside the Antarctic whale marine reserve. The issue with the whaling supply ship and greenpeace / sea shepherd ships proves this unreservedly and it is in these waters that the Australian government is obligated to take action via international treaty. However they just can not be bothered. It is a shame that a group from the other side of the world has to come down and attempt to protect these mammals. Scientific research what an absolute crock and most politicians are too scared or feeble minded to actually speak out and take actions against the unneccessary slaughter. The only real deterrent is to give the Navy, Customs or a private group authority to sink these vessels. We confiscate boats and burn them from Indonesian Fishermen. I have no recollection of ever seeing a whaling ship confiscated, however the Australian Navy have been sent after fishing boats doing a similar thing and apprehended them, confiscating the catch and vessel. Why, because it has a commercial effect on Australia. Customs and the Navy need better funding so they can do their job better. I know most Naval personnel and Customs Officers are very disappointed when all they can do is watch.

101RRS
13th January 2006, 12:15 PM
The area you speak of where arrests have been made is in the Australian Economic Exclusion zone around Australian territory. In the southern waters we also patrol the high seas under our role in the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) but unfortunately have no power to arrest these vessels (toothfish pirates) unless they have been spotted fishing in our economic exclusion zone.

Unfortunately the same does not apply to whales around Antarctica as any territorial claims on Antarctica by Australia cannot be supported internationally - that is why we only patrol waters around the Macquarie and Heard and McDonald Islands and not the 200 mile limit around our claims in Antarctica - the whale sanctury does not have any international standing. Note no whaling is being conducted in the Australia EEC.

We need to to get the whaling commission to ban these scientific kills and we have made significant inroads as was shown by the last vote - however we are not there yet. The problem with these actions (not so much by Greenpeace) but by the other group is that they will alienate the wavering countries that we have been working on to support us and if they begin to feel sorry for for Japan and Norway and vote with them next time - it won't be just scientific kills but the whole moritorium of whale hunting could be lifted - now that would be a disaster.

You say - sink the boats - despite what we might think they are legal and what happens if the Japanese Navy decides to provide protection for their legal but immoral hunts - it just escalates the issue but doesn't resolve it.

Garry

weeds
13th January 2006, 12:33 PM
unfortunity i think think it will ever stop

all for sensiable use of the world resource, if we are getting short on things than we should leave them alone

whilist i'm not a greeny its a full time job trying to stop my six and two year loving everything they catch in the back yard to death

CraigE
13th January 2006, 01:17 PM
It seems most of us are on the same page and disagree with whaling as a whole.
The problem is the Antarctic Treaty and the contempt shown for it by Japan. Japan are a signatory to this treaty but use the scientific research loophole to get around it. An easy way of closing it is to limit the catch to say 2 whales thus making it economically unviable. Just needs some countries with enough gumption to do it. The whole area is not supposed to be used to commercially catch whales, krill or toothfish and has an agreed protocol should fur seal hunting resume. The shameful thing is it is all about profits not neccessary harvesting for survival. The arrogance of the Japanese (sea harvesting anything and everything),
South Africa, Canada, Alaska (seal hunting), South America (Toothfish) and many countries that long line fish always amazes me. They are not interested in sustainable fishing, just taking what they want at any cost.

A war with Japan, well we beat them once, maybe another go is in order to curb their greater than though attitude.

My wife used to live in Albany as a child and can clearly remember the whaling station in action and reckons it was one of the most horrific things she has seen as do her parents. The whales are not killed before being cut up, just immobolised, then there are the sharks following taking pieces out of them. Humane, I think not.
At least if I hunt a roo or rabbit it is dead before I butcher it and I only aim for head shots.
I am not against hunting for food (farming is a better, sustainable idea), but hunting animals with a low population and forcing them into extinction is just plain arrogant and stupid. I would like my grand kids (a long way off yet) to be able to see whales, seals, dolphins, tigers lions, elephant etc in the wild if they so wish.