PDA

View Full Version : EV Landcruiser



goingbush
6th May 2018, 10:01 PM
Heres a Toyota I'm really interested in.


https://youtu.be/lRiJkd5EJ2g

goingbush
7th May 2018, 12:07 PM
More info here

Zero Emission Vehicles – Heavy Electric Vehicle Manufacturers (http://zevnz.com)

loanrangie
7th May 2018, 12:18 PM
I see it still rides like a horse cart, driver is getting thrown side to side.

weeds
7th May 2018, 12:58 PM
I don’t get Zero Emission......yeah sure the car puts out zero but to recharge emission has to be created somewhere.

bee utey
7th May 2018, 01:14 PM
I don’t get Zero Emission......yeah sure the car puts out zero but to recharge emission has to be created somewhere.

I didn't see any sky scrapers blocking the sunlight falling on the barn where the vehicle would be kept. [bighmmm]

Geedublya
7th May 2018, 01:47 PM
What about the wind turning the windmills?

goingbush
7th May 2018, 02:35 PM
I see it still rides like a horse cart, driver is getting thrown side to side.


Yep, Pretty much the same as my Defender !

goingbush
7th May 2018, 02:39 PM
I don’t get Zero Emission......yeah sure the car puts out zero but to recharge emission has to
be created somewhere.

Little do people realise it takes more Electricity to refine the oil to produce petrol / diesel that would be used by Electric Vehicles to travel the same distance as the Internal Combustion powered vehicles that use that petrol / oil.

weeds
7th May 2018, 03:54 PM
I didn't see any sky scrapers blocking the sunlight falling on the barn where the vehicle would be kept. [bighmmm]

Well i suppose I was looking into it a little more than that.....

Just think how many emissions went onto the air from

Manufacturing the car
Building the shed the car was in
Manufacturing solar panels
Manufacturing wind farms
Installers driving to and from installation.

Or are all these emission free??

What I would like to see the a rating or a number that tell the purchaser when the produce become cost/emission neutral......

You can have an emission free cars but not much points if its journey to the new owner has produced more emission than the cars is going to save over its life.

I’d be happy if they advertised low emission or return on emissions is this many kilometers.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d like our next run about for the bride to be electric.

weeds
7th May 2018, 03:55 PM
Little do people realise it takes more Electricity to refine the oil to produce petrol / diesel that would be used by Electric Vehicles to travel the same distance as the Internal Combustion powered vehicles that use that petrol / oil.

I understand that....I’d be better if there was some sort of ratio/star rating/ return of emissions from manufacture and recharge.

Robmacca
7th May 2018, 04:18 PM
I understand that....I’d be better if there was some sort of ratio/star rating/ return of emissions from manufacture and recharge.


I'm waiting to see how they deal with the remote touring side of things for the larger touring range/distances and recharging in a reasonable time frame?

scarry
7th May 2018, 04:43 PM
I'm waiting to see how they deal with the remote touring side of things for the larger touring range/distances and recharging in a reasonable time frame?

With a 3T van in tow.[biggrin]

goingbush
7th May 2018, 05:07 PM
I'm waiting to see how they deal with the remote touring side of things for the larger touring range/distances and recharging in a reasonable time frame?

Well until battery tech is improved there is such a thing as a turbine Range extender, for those with 'range anxiety" , like a small capstone genset.




https://youtu.be/VQBJu-kTu0E

bee utey
7th May 2018, 05:33 PM
Well i suppose I was looking into it a little more than that.....

Just think how many emissions went onto the air from

Manufacturing the car
Building the shed the car was in
Manufacturing solar panels
Manufacturing wind farms
Installers driving to and from installation.

Or are all these emission free??

What I would like to see the a rating or a number that tell the purchaser when the produce become cost/emission neutral......

You can have an emission free cars but not much points if its journey to the new owner has produced more emission than the cars is going to save over its life.

I’d be happy if they advertised low emission or return on emissions is this many kilometers.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d like our next run about for the bride to be electric.

The trouble is that you're shooting at a target with skates on, i.e. what's true today isn't going to be true on another day. Every solar panel and every wind turbine that's made and installed has a payback period at which it has returned the energy spent on construction. After that the device produces essentially zero cost emissions free energy. So every year energy production, transport, retail and manufacturing as a whole gets a bit cleaner. Do you want to analyse each and every individual car/shed/panel/turbine? Was it made on a cool, windy and sunny day or a calm summers night? Or are you happy to know the rate of progress of the system as a whole? Numbers for the latter are pretty easy to find, state by state, country by country.

Dorian
9th May 2018, 07:06 AM
The trouble is that you're shooting at a target with skates on, i.e. what's true today isn't going to be true on another day. Every solar panel and every wind turbine that's made and installed has a payback period at which it has returned the energy spent on construction. After that the device produces essentially zero cost emissions free energy. So every year energy production, transport, retail and manufacturing as a whole gets a bit cleaner. Do you want to analyse each and every individual car/shed/panel/turbine? Was it made on a cool, windy and sunny day or a calm summers night? Or are you happy to know the rate of progress of the system as a whole? Numbers for the latter are pretty easy to find, state by state, country by country.


x2

and sooner than later all of those solar panels etc etc will be made with zero emission electricity.

Dorian
9th May 2018, 07:16 AM
Little do people realise it takes more Electricity to refine the oil to produce petrol / diesel that would be used by Electric Vehicles to travel the same distance as the Internal Combustion powered vehicles that use that petrol / oil.

I'd really like to see the math behind that statement, sounds a bit vegan to me

Dorian
9th May 2018, 07:28 AM
This is a good concept for this NZ company, it looks like their main market is mining companies that want to go green. They have just shoved (yes I realize that it's a difficult and complex shove) a couple of batteries and an electric motor into a Tojo, because that's what the mines want.
For this it would be ideal, short range and back to base for a recharge at smoko and if you go flat a recovery is not too far away.

If (or really when) toyota give it a real shove, I'm sure that they would be doing in-wheel motors hanging off independent suspension.

Cheers Glen

strangy
9th May 2018, 08:02 AM
Well until battery tech is improved there is such a thing as a turbine Range extender, for those with 'range anxiety" , like a small capstone genset.




https://youtu.be/VQBJu-kTu0E

Essentially a model plane turbine strapped to a generator. Not a new idea. But looks nicely executed.
I would like to have heard it running. If it has been made quiet enough to not be offensive, I doubt it would be particularly efficient.

goingbush
9th May 2018, 09:02 AM
If (or really when) toyota give it a real shove, I'm sure that they would be doing in-wheel motors hanging off independent suspension.

Cheers Glen

I can tell you have never driven an Electric car , if you had you would say Toyota will give battery tech a real shove, that where the improvements need to new made. Motor and driveline is a no brainer. Bollinger have that sorted.

In wheel motors are not going to happen on anything except bicycles.. too much unsprung weight .

goingbush
9th May 2018, 09:19 AM
I'd really like to see the math behind that statement, sounds a bit vegan to me

some light reading on the topic, from different viewpoints


Do Gasoline Based Cars Really Use More Electricity than Electric Vehicles Do? | Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org/blog/do-gasoline-based-cars-really-use-more-electricity-electric-vehicles-do)

The 6 kWh electricity to refine gasoline would drive an electric car the same distance as a gasser? (https://greentransportation.info/energy-transportation/gasoline-costs-6kwh.html)

Refining oil requires more electricity than EVs | PluginCars.com (http://www.plugincars.com/refining-oil-requires-more-electricity-evs.html)

BTW Im not a Green or a Vegan , far from it , Ive even pulled the EGR / DPF from my Iveco 4x4 .

I converted my LandRover to 100% electric purely as a project & to learn the tech. Its 100% free to run of my solar array, I charge about once every 3 -4 days . 100km of local running about per charge. Its the best driving experience Ive had , 100% torque for zero RPM.

I did not do it for economical reasons either, The $22,000 cost of the conversion will recover itself from petrol savings in about 10 years , sooner if the price of petrol climbs. The batteries are good for up to 3000 charge cycles at 100% Depth of Discharge, = 300,000km or 10,000 charge cycles & 80% DOD = 800,000km absolutely free , 800,000km . At a petrol cost (todays price) $22 per 100km , 300,000km = $66,000

Mick_Marsh
9th May 2018, 12:15 PM
The trouble is that you're shooting at a target with skates on, i.e. what's true today isn't going to be true on another day. Every solar panel and every wind turbine that's made and installed has a payback period at which it has returned the energy spent on construction. After that the device produces essentially zero cost emissions free energy. So every year energy production, transport, retail and manufacturing as a whole gets a bit cleaner. Do you want to analyse each and every individual car/shed/panel/turbine? Was it made on a cool, windy and sunny day or a calm summers night? Or are you happy to know the rate of progress of the system as a whole? Numbers for the latter are pretty easy to find, state by state, country by country.
Solar panels have a life. They deteriorate over time an use. Their efficiency reduces until they are no linger viable.
You can compare renewables to traditional forms of power generation. It's called LCOE.
At the moment, brown coal is way cheaper than solar.

Dorian
9th May 2018, 01:45 PM
I can tell you have never driven an Electric car , if you had you would say Toyota will give battery tech a real shove, that where the improvements need to new made. Motor and driveline is a no brainer. Bollinger have that sorted.

In wheel motors are not going to happen on anything except bicycles.. too much unsprung weight .

I have driven various electric vehicles especially in underground mines etc not a lot, just a few and have always been impressed. BTW all of the big haul trucks in open cast mines are electric, it's just that they also carry a dirty great big gensets with them. All of these units work with in-wheel motors and planetary gearboxes. Sure the suspension design is not weight dependent but the ability of these systems to offer great traction distribution at all speeds is just glorious.

Have a look at what they are doing with pancake servo motors, the jumps these things have made in the last 20 years with regards to increased torque and weight reduction is thoroughly impressive and while not ready at the moment it won't be long before they will do the job, perhaps not enough for a high speed roadster but certainly for Landcruiser / Defender / GWagon application. If you consider the energy saving of deleting diffs and inherent traction benifits some clever engineering boffin will sort it out.

Cheers Glen

Dorian
9th May 2018, 02:10 PM
some light reading on the topic, from different viewpoints


Do Gasoline Based Cars Really Use More Electricity than Electric Vehicles Do? | Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org/blog/do-gasoline-based-cars-really-use-more-electricity-electric-vehicles-do)

The 6 kWh electricity to refine gasoline would drive an electric car the same distance as a gasser? (https://greentransportation.info/energy-transportation/gasoline-costs-6kwh.html)

Refining oil requires more electricity than EVs | PluginCars.com (http://www.plugincars.com/refining-oil-requires-more-electricity-evs.html)

BTW Im not a Green or a Vegan , far from it , Ive even pulled the EGR / DPF from my Iveco 4x4 .

I converted my LandRover to 100% electric purely as a project & to learn the tech. Its 100% free to run of my solar array, I charge about once every 3 -4 days . 100km of local running about per charge. Its the best driving experience Ive had , 100% torque for zero RPM.

I did not do it for economical reasons either, The $22,000 cost of the conversion will recover itself from petrol savings in about 10 years , sooner if the price of petrol climbs. The batteries are good for up to 3000 charge cycles at 100% Depth of Discharge, = 300,000km or 10,000 charge cycles & 80% DOD = 800,000km absolutely free , 800,000km . At a petrol cost (todays price) $22 per 100km , 300,000km = $66,000

So in no way am I saying that we shouldn't go electric or that it is not inherently better than diesel / petrol, I've also followed your build post on the EV conversion to your land rover and think it's great, wish I have the garage space and time.

However I've read all three of your articles in full and even they admit that the maths is flawed in that it take all of the electricity used by refineries and divides it by the amount of gasoline produced. This doesn't take into account the diesel produced or the jet fuel or the kero or the lube oil or the bitumen etc. On the vehicle side you could get a light weight EV 30 miles on 7KwH but at what speed, up or down hill etc all of these variables consume different amounts of energy.

Apologies for the vegan remark, I've just had a vegan in my life telling me that they only started making cakes with eggs in the 1850's. Perhaps I should have used the term Cafe Math instead of Vegan.
Those of you who didn't followed Hitchers guide to the galaxy Bistromatics | Hitchhikers | FANDOM powered by Wikia (http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Bistromatics)

Cheers Glen

goingbush
9th May 2018, 02:38 PM
Thanks for clearing the air Glen,

a bit off topic but I did some interesting testing yesterday.
results are not what I expected ,

I use more power to drive at 5kmh in low range (7.5 Amps ) than in 3rd gear high range (5 Amps).
on a smooth flat road

to maintain a steady speed staying in 3rd
5 A = 5kmh , 10A = 10kmh 15A = 15kmh 25A=20 kmh 40A=30kmh 100A= 60kmh

In 4th gear you can easily maintain 80kmh at 100 Amps, 100kmh 150 Amps, 125kmh 300 Amps

that might look interesting in a graph but looks like 15kmh in 3rd gear is the most efficient speed , obviously where aerodynamic co-efficient does not come into play.

Dorian
9th May 2018, 02:54 PM
Thanks for being generous again apologies for the inference.

As for the amps, my guess is that the higher speed of the gear sets in the transfer case are consuming more power as it churns thru the oil.
Don't know what the specs are of your motor are but it would burn a bit more power at higher speeds.

Cheers Glen

bsperka
9th May 2018, 04:04 PM
At the moment, brown coal is way cheaper than solar.
That's true, until you have to replace the power station (same issue as with solar panels, they need to be replaced). The governments sold the assets due to this issue. Or get charged for the pollution (same issue with solar panels).

Mick_Marsh
9th May 2018, 05:16 PM
That's true, until you have to replace the power station (same issue as with solar panels, they need to be replaced). The governments sold the assets due to this issue. Or get charged for the pollution (same issue with solar panels).
In the past, it was not necessary to replace power stations. There were rolling refurbishments and upgrades. I (and others on this forum) were involved in them.
It's way cheaper to do this rather than demolish and rebuild. A concept lost on the short sighted.

We are currently demolishing brown coal power plants and trying to exist on inadequate wind and solar. Brown coal is still cheaper, as is reflected in our skyrocketing power bills.

If we are going to replace petrol and diesel with electric technology, we need to fix our electrical grid and, unfortunately, replacing the high capacity coal energy plants with miniscule capacity solar and wind ain't working.

Phideaux
10th May 2018, 08:22 AM
The trouble is that you're shooting at a target with skates on, i.e. what's true today isn't going to be true on another day. Every solar panel and every wind turbine that's made and installed has a payback period at which it has returned the energy spent on construction. After that the device produces essentially zero cost emissions free energy. So every year energy production, transport, retail and manufacturing as a whole gets a bit cleaner. Do you want to analyse each and every individual car/shed/panel/turbine? Was it made on a cool, windy and sunny day or a calm summers night? Or are you happy to know the rate of progress of the system as a whole? Numbers for the latter are pretty easy to find, state by state, country by country.

This is a fascinating series of posts!!
Responding to a few thoughts raised:
* the modified Toyota is a 'mine special' - probably costs a motsa - but serves its purpose.
* the obvious solution to 'range' is PHEV - of which the turbine shown is an interesting development. One would need to look closer at the actual performance; my first guess is there would be turbine whine to be dealt with - but there wouldn't be the reciprocating motor vibration to deal with. I expect some manufacturer will grab this tech and run with it.
* Does it take 5kw (about 20 old-fashioned miles worth for a Tesla S) to generate an (old fashioned US gallon's worth) of fuel? That's debated. One partisan response is the claim is based on 'old data' and in fact refineries use their own fuel to produce fuel.
** I couldn't find a greenhouse or energy equivalent figure for that (!!)
*** wait - does that mean to produce a fuel that becomes a greenhouse gas when used we're already producing greenhouse gases?? Couldn't get any info on that one either.
* The infrastructure thing with EVs is not only 'supercharger network' - it's that once it's in, there's only wires and maintenance. There's no fuel station, underground tanks, tankers on the roads, tankers producing greenhouse gases to deliver fuels which become greenhouse gases ...
But! - when you park your car at home - your home is a fueling station.
* As to where the power comes from - well, my daughter is currently writing up her PHD on 'distributed generation' amongst other things re renewables - so - watch this space. Basically, massive single-point power-stations (coal or nuclear) are finished; cleaner gas-fired generators have a chance but we're selling our natural gas overseas under short-sighted arrangements.
* Finding an EV that can tow a 3T van somewhere remote - well... Ain't been done yet.
** the Jaguar I-Pace initially had no provision for towing; current version has a 750kg possibility (much sought-after in Norway, where Teslas are immensely popular and apparently towbars can be a deal-breaker), this is expected to be upgraded as the motor/batteries get their upgrades. Wading depth of the I-Pace is 50cm.

Upshot?
# EVs are coming (and self-drive, too)
# Off-road EVs - I'm 66 and I think I'll live to see them in ordinary use.
** It's not too hard to imagine our red centre peppered with combined solar/wind/battery off-grid charging points.
# Off-road EVs towing 3T vans? Hmm... I wonder.

I wish we were building EVs in our just-emptied car factories... and had a government that was future-focused, not leg-shackled to the past (and the big end of town). Sigh.

Taking my diesel-powered AWD and human-powered hand-winch for a 3000k trip next week. Oh, goody!

Phideaux.

strangy
10th May 2018, 08:41 AM
I’m really looking forward to EV offering from Lucas.

bee utey
10th May 2018, 08:59 AM
Someone on this thread needs to be very very good and MAYBE, Santa will give him some coal for Christmas. Then he can burn it in his backyard bbq and get back to his mud burning roots. [biggrin]

goingbush
16th May 2018, 07:35 PM
<snip>
** It's not too hard to imagine our red centre peppered with combined solar/wind/battery off-grid charging points.

Phideaux.

The Outback is already peppered with solar / battery off grid installations, In the form of Telstra repeater stations, which are pretty much redundant with the roll out of the NBN , the tech is 30 years old retrofitting with modern efficient panels, & adding charging points will be cheap & Easy.

Obviously not sufficient for EV saturation , but its a start . My DIY Landy EV has a practical range of 80km , I could easily cross the continent at the moment hopping from Caravan park to Caravan park (charge via 15Amp outlet) & then repeater station to repeater station , oops , did I forget to hand my Telstra keys back ??

This is interesting

Telstra unveils its big battery - it's nearly 10 times bigger than Tesla’s : RenewEconomy (https://reneweconomy.com.au/telstra-unveils-its-big-battery-its-nearly-10-times-bigger-than-teslas-29761/)

DiscoMick
16th May 2018, 08:18 PM
Solar powered charging stations will solve the outback touring range issue.

BTW coal is only cheaper because coal power stations and railways were totally taxpayer funded so were 100% subsidised, never having to repay the cost, and then sold off for a pittance, so the true cost was never recovered. Factor in the original cost and they are unviable.
They were sold off because it wasn't financially viable to update them.
It's also not financially to lend the money needed to build new coal power systems, which is why none of the banks will lend to coal. There isn't a viable business case.

bsperka
16th May 2018, 09:19 PM
Britian just ran for 2 days for the first time in 136 years without using any coal in their power stations. Britain goes more than two days without using coal power for first time in 136 years | The Independent (https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/uk-no-coal-power-renewable-energy-record-electricity-climate-change-wind-solar-a8312116.html)

donh54
17th May 2018, 05:30 AM
Solar powered charging stations will solve the outback touring range issue.

BTW coal is only cheaper because coal power stations and railways were totally taxpayer funded so were 100% subsidised, never having to repay the cost, and then sold off for a pittance, so the true cost was never recovered. Factor in the original cost and they are unviable.
They were sold off because it wasn't financially viable to update them.
It's also not financially to lend the money needed to build new coal power systems, which is why none of the banks will lend to coal. There isn't a viable business case.I thought they were sold off so the Gubmint could balance the books (on paper)! The new owners now bleed the end user dry, whilst also getting great wads of taxpayer's dollars.
No way should any nation hand control of it's vital assets, like power, water, and transportation infrastructure, over to a corporation whose sole aim is to increase the value to shareholders.
Anyone who says that privatisation of any asset will lead to lower costs for users, is as stupid as the people who vote for them.

DiscoMick
17th May 2018, 05:46 AM
Stations like Hazelwood and Liddell were decrepit.

bsperka
17th May 2018, 06:35 AM
I thought they were sold off so the Gubmint could balance the books (on paper)! The new owners now bleed the end user dry, whilst also getting great wads of taxpayer's dollars.

They were most probably sold off as the government knew what a liability they would become. So they sold them whilst they were still economically viable but had been written down. So saved money in upgrades and made money on sale.