bob10
21st November 2019, 06:58 PM
Makes sense to me.
To feed the world in 2050 we need to build the plants that evolution didn't (https://theconversation.com/to-feed-the-world-in-2050-we-need-to-build-the-plants-that-evolution-didnt-127316?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20 for%20November%2021%202019%20-%201466213903&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20f or%20November%2021%202019%20-%201466213903+CID_a016e0f5111647c2e403567c68a3e7a6&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=To%20feed%20the%20world%20in%202050%20we% 20need%20to%20build%20the%20plants%20that%20evolut ion%20didnt)
To feed the world in 2050 we need to build the plants that evolution didn't (https://theconversation.com/to-feed-the-world-in-2050-we-need-to-build-the-plants-that-evolution-didnt-127316?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20 for%20November%2021%202019%20-%201466213903&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20f or%20November%2021%202019%20-%201466213903+CID_a016e0f5111647c2e403567c68a3e7a6&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=To%20feed%20the%20world%20in%202050%20we% 20need%20to%20build%20the%20plants%20that%20evolut ion%20didnt)