speleomike
1st April 2020, 01:39 PM
Hi all
I won't buy a car where the air conditioning and fans controls are in a touch screen. Maybe even for the radio station controls also. It's about time that this problem is getting some research.
Eventually one automotive manufacturer has got it right. Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls (https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/motor-shows-geneva-motor-show/honda-bucks-industry-trend-removing-touchscreen-controls)
There is now some research that suggests that our driving ability is severely impaired by trying to use touch screen controls, without that tactile feedback, requiring us to take our eyes away from observing the road and controlling the car.
Just search on Google for "apple car play worst than cannabis" or "apple car play worst than alcohol".
Apple Carplay and Android Auto could be worse for reaction times than cannabis or alcohol, says study (https://www.driving.co.uk/news/apple-carplay-android-auto-worse-reaction-times-cannabis-alcohol-says-study/)
Infotainment systems are worse than cannabis or alcohol for driving performance | Traffic Technology Today (https://www.traffictechnologytoday.com/news/planning/infotainment-systems-are-worse-than-cannabis-or-alcohol-for-driving-performance.html)
I adjust the fan often, a passing car on a dirt road requires a quick flip to interior recirculation, or I just need more fan on the face or less. As for the radio, I often need to turn it down during ads or flip to another channel. I just know where to find the button, and do it - no concentration involved and NO shift of vision away from the road. Oh, and voice control I think is very distracting. It really does take concentration.
What do others think?
Do you think younger drivers might perform better than older drivers at using a touch screen or is it just a bad user interface for all?
Is voice control just as distracting as a touch screen?
Mike
I won't buy a car where the air conditioning and fans controls are in a touch screen. Maybe even for the radio station controls also. It's about time that this problem is getting some research.
Eventually one automotive manufacturer has got it right. Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls (https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/motor-shows-geneva-motor-show/honda-bucks-industry-trend-removing-touchscreen-controls)
There is now some research that suggests that our driving ability is severely impaired by trying to use touch screen controls, without that tactile feedback, requiring us to take our eyes away from observing the road and controlling the car.
Just search on Google for "apple car play worst than cannabis" or "apple car play worst than alcohol".
Apple Carplay and Android Auto could be worse for reaction times than cannabis or alcohol, says study (https://www.driving.co.uk/news/apple-carplay-android-auto-worse-reaction-times-cannabis-alcohol-says-study/)
Infotainment systems are worse than cannabis or alcohol for driving performance | Traffic Technology Today (https://www.traffictechnologytoday.com/news/planning/infotainment-systems-are-worse-than-cannabis-or-alcohol-for-driving-performance.html)
I adjust the fan often, a passing car on a dirt road requires a quick flip to interior recirculation, or I just need more fan on the face or less. As for the radio, I often need to turn it down during ads or flip to another channel. I just know where to find the button, and do it - no concentration involved and NO shift of vision away from the road. Oh, and voice control I think is very distracting. It really does take concentration.
What do others think?
Do you think younger drivers might perform better than older drivers at using a touch screen or is it just a bad user interface for all?
Is voice control just as distracting as a touch screen?
Mike