Log in

View Full Version : An opinion piece on Australia and the Afghanistan War



bob10
15th November 2020, 05:15 PM
https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/t-wall_art_tk_2012-800x444.jpg
Thought provoking (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/category/contact-blog-spot/thought-provoking/)
OPINION PIECE – John Bale on IGADF Afghanistan Inquiry
(https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/tag/igadf-afghanistan-inquiry/)
https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/share_post2.jpgBY JOHN BALE
Justice Paul Brereton’s long-running* war crimes inquiry into Australian Special Forces in Afghanistan is now finalised.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison has foreshadowed that the report “will be difficult and hard news for Australians (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/12/pm-announces-new-afghanistan-inquiry-investigative-body/)“.

I fear for the legacy this report may leave for the tens of thousands who served in Afghanistan, the wounded, the families and friends of the 41 killed. What will our nation think of us?
Michael Fussell and I went to school together in Armidale, NSW, and joined the Australian Army in 2002. On 27 November 2008, he was killed by an improvised explosive device in Oruzgan province, Afghanistan. His death spurred my wife, a good friend and I to start Soldier On, an organisation that supports wounded veterans and their families.



To his family and his mates, Michael will never just be a number. We want to know that his loss meant something. We want to know that the actions of a few who forgot our values will not tarnish his sacrifice. Our Afghanistan veterans, many of whom we supported through Soldier On, must be able to keep their heads high when they talk about their place in our military history.
We fought for something worthwhile – our legacy must reflect this.

My father’s war, Vietnam, split the deep connection that Australia had with its military since the beaches of Gallipoli. The ramifications for this disintegration had long-term affects on the Australian Defence Force, especially the veterans who fought in that war.
Vietnam veterans have horrendous rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, suicide, alcohol abuse, divorce, domestic violence and homelessness. Many died younger than they should. Their children had much higher rates of mental-health injuries and suicide than the Australian population.
For Vietnam veterans, their war made them outsiders.

Our valiant efforts to support the people of East Timor choose self-determination and eventually independence reset the relationship between Australians and their defence force.
My war – Afghanistan, in which I played a tiny part – has a unique relationship with the Australian people.
While the Afghanistan War was originally popular, the Iraq War and the length of time we stayed in Afghanistan meant the Australian people lost faith. But even with the absence of a coherent strategy, while many might not have supported the war, we at least supported the veterans and our defence force.
The political negotiations between Kabul and the Taliban and the IGADF Afghanistan Inquiry report threaten to affect our memory of the Afghanistan War and the veterans who fought there. It may erode the ADF’s almost sacred position in our society. As all Vietnam veterans can attest, being rejected by your community has real implications.
‘Abu Ghraib’ and ‘My Lai’ are synonymous with the wars in which they were fought and highlight how war crimes can erode the relationship between a nation and its armed forces and poison the legacy for all who fought in them.
How a small number of Australia’s Special Forces committed these alleged war crimes will be the focus of much soul-searching, and many books and speeches. But the more immediate questions that will help protect the legacy of most Afghanistan veterans is – what good did we actually do? What good were we trying to do?

Our involvement in Afghanistan was our first major war since Vietnam. While we learned many lessons, not all were the right ones. This was never more the case than the role of the media in wartime. Vietnam taught the military to limit the media’s accessibility in an attempt to shore up support back home. Between the Vietnam and Afghanistan wars, the US had recognised the importance of keeping its country in greater touch with its efforts overseas.

The lack of Australian stories from Afghanistan now haunts our ability to show the overwhelming good done and the professionalism and care in which it was carried out. The ledger should be full of stories about reconstruction, training, mentoring and the positive impact made by thousands of Australians.

However, the cupboard is almost bare. The restrictions on media were so tight that we have close to nothing to show the good we did, or tried to do. We are left with retrospectives and carefully crafted PR spin.
The Australian people have a right to be informed of what their defence force does, especially in wartime. This accountability builds transparency and transparency builds trust. While militaries can never be fully transparent, they cannot be opaque.

The Australian people are not naive enough to think any war, let alone an insurgency, will be simple. While militaries often struggle to communicate their complex missions, many journalists build a career doing just that. In failing to let the ADF tell its Afghanistan story as it happened, we robbed ourselves of the opportunity to easily show the nation that these alleged war crimes were but the actions of a few.

The stories we do have in abundance from our time in Afghanistan are from our wounded. They show the fortitude and values that truly underpin military service. Their right to tell their stories was hard-fought. But their stories will help regain the trust of the Australian people. They will help show what they and their families sacrificed to help give a war-ravaged country the chance to be free, educated and prosperous.
However, with allegations of war crimes soon to be unveiled by Brereton’s report, we need to encourage all who have served in Afghanistan to tell their story. All must speak and write about the positive impact they made, or intended to make, while representing their nation – and reflecting its military’s values.

Afghanistan veterans cannot let those who forgot our country’s values write our narrative. We have an opportunity to help write a legacy that maintains trust and our position in our rich military history. Positive stories far outnumber those soon to be revealed by Brereton.
We ask that you give us an opportunity to tell these stories – to show we did, or tried to do, something worthwhile in a manner that can make us all proud.
The place in society of a generation of veterans relies on it.

John Bale is a former Australian Army officer who served in Afghanistan.
He is a co-founder and managing director of Fortem Australia (https://fortemaustralia.org.au/)
and was a founder of Soldier On (https://soldieron.org.au/)A version of this opinion piece by John Bale
was originally published in The Australian (https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/afghanistan-message-may-hurt-but-we-need-to-hear-it/news-story/971715e2224770b879e2dda3d3dc46d5)
newspaper on 22 August 2020.
John Bale gave us permission to
re-publish his opinions here.

bob10
15th November 2020, 06:19 PM
One soldiers take on the RAR.

RAR Special Feature – Steady boots on the ground - CONTACT magazine (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/09/steady-boots-on-the-ground-rar-special-feature/)

bob10
16th November 2020, 08:07 AM
Most read story in CONTACT history - CONTACT magazine (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2015/10/01/most-read-story-in-contact-history/)

bob10
17th November 2020, 08:21 AM
OPINION

'They are not one of us': SAS soldiers condemn war crime perpetrators

For the first time in SASR history, a group of 12 current and former soldiers have stepped out from the shadows to remind the country what they are, and what they are not.






The matters before us are of an extremely grave nature, and we accept that the impact of the Brereton inquiry may adversely affect former and current serving members and their families, as well as our strategic relationships with other coalition forces around the world. Whatever the outcome, we prefer our regimental history to reflect hard truths over comforting fantasy. If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.
We also believe that the same principle of truth in reporting should be embraced by the media, so as not to unduly impugn the reputation of the SASR as a whole, or inadvertently imply improper behaviour committed by former or current serving members. Equally, we applaud accurate portrayals of misconduct provided it is supported by appropriate context and evidence.

SAS war crime perpetrators '''are not one of us''': Australian soldiers (https://www.smh.com.au/national/they-are-not-one-of-us-sas-soldiers-condemn-war-crime-perpetrators-20201116-p56ezv.html)

bob10
18th November 2020, 09:43 AM
A look at the SAS culture.

The inquiry into Australian soldiers in Afghanistan is finally over. The reckoning is about to begin - ABC News (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-18/igadf-inquiry-into-special-forces-in-afghanistan-is-over/12816626)

bob10
19th November 2020, 08:52 AM
Syrians are using European courts to seek justice on War Crimes.

One of the most recent cases to make headlines saw Syrians taking on those they see as funding a proxy war in their homeland. The long-running Syrian civil war (https://www.dw.com/en/war-in-syria-enters-tenth-year/a-52783819) began in 2011, after the government headed by Bashar Assad started to arrest anti-government protesters. But since then, other countries — including Iran, Turkey and Russia — have supported fighters on the ground and prolonged the civil war.



Syrians seek justice for war crimes in Europe’s courts | Middle East| News and analysis of events in the Arab world | DW | 17.11.2020 (https://www.dw.com/en/syrians-seek-justice-for-war-crimes-in-europes-courts/a-55632079'maca=en-newsletter_en_bulletin-2097-xml-newsletter&r=2716467892229383&lid=1679283&pm_ln=62203)

bob10
19th November 2020, 09:12 PM
Along with comprehensive reforms, the natural flow of new personnel through the ADF means that 80% of those serving in the SAS now did not deploy to Afghanistan in a special operations task group. Burr says that reflects how quickly the army can refresh and regenerate capability. That, he says, ‘gives us a strong platform to make sure we are embracing and inculcating these new initiatives and making sure that we are living these expectations every day’.
While detailed allegations will only emerge in the coming week when Brereton’s report is released, questions have already been asked about whether Australia’s special forces units might be disbanded. Asked if the fact that they operated in small groups outside the immediate view of commanders played a role in what has happened and meant that the model was no longer sustainable, Burr says that the model does work and must be sustained


Atrocities in Afghanistan, and a grim echo from the Lindt Cafe siege | The Strategist (https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/atrocities-in-afghanistan-and-a-grim-echo-from-the-lindt-cafe-siege/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Weekly%20The%20Strategist&utm_content=Weekly%20The%20Strategist+CID_1a21d70f 4a4eccff5917e912b29e3b9e&utm_source=CampaignMonitor&utm_term=Atrocities%20in%20Afghanistan%20and%20a%2 0grim%20echo%20from%20the%20Lindt%20Caf%20siege)

bob10
26th November 2020, 12:41 PM
Just what was the Australian mission in Afghanistan? Was anything achieved, besides our reputation tarnished? Should we ever send our military to war without Cabinet discussion, and approval ?

Australia’s mission in Afghanistan – what was it again? (lowyinstitute.org) (https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/australia-s-mission-afghanistan-what-was-it-again)

bob10
29th November 2020, 06:35 PM
Amen to this.


Speaking to TV news crews at the AWM, former Major Russell took a serious swing at his former boss, CDF General Angus Campbell, for wearing a Distinguished Service Cross for his command of Australians in action, including the Special Operations Task Group, during the time of the alleged war crimes.
“To then turn around and say via this report that he was unable to exercise effective command and control and to abdicate his command responsibility down to senior NCO, junior NCO and soldier level…
“…that’s not the sign of a leader – that is the sign of a politician – and that is one of the most disgusting demonstrations of senior leadership.



Former SF major attacks CDF over unit citations - CONTACT magazine (contactairlandandsea.com) (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/27/former-sf-major-attacks-cdf-over-unit-citations/)

bob10
2nd December 2020, 01:09 PM
Pursuing commanding officers is also important for the soldiers that served on the ground. The report has raised serious questions about how elite forces were pushed to their breaking point. Australia needs to know what role commanders had in that.
Of course, turning the focus on the moral responsibility of senior officers is not intended to absolve the alleged crimes committed by individuals. The point is simply that the military needs to demonstrate to the public, as well as to past and current members of the armed services, that senior officers cannot completely avoid responsibility for what happened.



https://theconversation.com/why-australian-commanders-need-to-be-held-responsible-for-alleged-war-crimes-in-afghanistan

bob10
10th December 2020, 08:18 AM
Andrew Hastie, MP, SAS, tells it as it is.


"First, we have forgotten basic truths about human nature that previous generations of Australians better understood.

Second, we ignored the true nature of war and sanitised it

Third, parliamentary scrutiny of Defence is broken and needs fixing.

Fourth, the Brereton Report rightly condemns a warrior culture that fused ‘military excellence with ego, entitlement and exceptionalism’

Fifth, in the hierarchy of virtues, moral courage remains paramount to physical courage (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/24/opinion-andrew-hastie-mp-ex-sas-on-brereton-inquiry/)

So before people cry for a repudiation of all warrior culture, they should first understand what you need in an elite special operations unit. You need people who run to the sound of the guns. Who are prepared to fight and destroy Australia’s enemies. Who will die doing so, if necessary. Those men exist. They are serving at present. They have done nothing wrong. We need to uphold them and their vital mission. They will not be helped by soulless modern cultural theory, derived from the academic ivory tower. It may well diminish our effectiveness if shoe-horned and institutionalised. (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/24/opinion-andrew-hastie-mp-ex-sas-on-brereton-inquiry/)


OPINION: Andrew Hastie MP/ex-SAS – on Brereton Inquiry - CONTACT magazine (contactairlandandsea.com) (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/11/24/opinion-andrew-hastie-mp-ex-sas-on-brereton-inquiry/)

bob10
10th December 2020, 08:36 AM
Vale, Afghanistan. What was achieved, and was it worth it, we must ask.




Home : Vale : Department of Defence (https://www.defence.gov.au/vale/default.asp)

EDIT. The full list.

ROHasof5NOV2015.pdf (defence.gov.au) (https://www.defence.gov.au/vale/docs/ROHasof5NOV2015.pdf)

bob10
27th December 2020, 08:02 PM
VALE SAS 2 Squadron. Interesting comments in the comments section.

2 Squadron SASR struck off – secretly - CONTACT magazine (contactairlandandsea.com) (https://www.contactairlandandsea.com/2020/12/17/2-squadron-sasr-struck-off-secretly/)

bob10
29th December 2020, 12:27 PM
Senator Lambie , re Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran suicide.


17 December 2020To the Veteran community,Re: Royal Commission into defence and veteran suicide

It’s the end of the political year and I want to update you on where things stand with respect to the campaign for a Royal Commission into defence and veteran suicide. I’ve noticed there’s a bit of confusion floating around about what’s happening right now, as well as what comes next. The Government and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation have 38 votes in the Senate, of 76. You need an absolute majority (39 votes, under normal circumstances) to pass legislation; a tied vote counts as a fail. With only One Nation and the Coalition supporting the legislation for a National Commissioner for Defence and Veteran Suicide Prevention, the legislation cannot pass the Senate. The Government has indicated it intends to spend the summer Christmas break trying to switch the votes of members of the Senate crossbench, with a view to putting the legislation to a vote only once it has the numbers to pass. During the last sitting fortnight of 2020, the Government twice joined with Pauline Hanson’s One Nation to oppose procedural moves to require the National Commissioner’s enabling legislation to be dealt with before Christmas of 2020. The preference of the two was that the legislation not be debated, amended or passed before that time. In both instances, Jacqui Lambie, Senator Rex Patrick, Centre Alliance, the Greens and the Australian Labor Party supported the move to bring the bill on for debate.

The interim National Commissioner, Bernadette Boss CSC, continues her work on a desktop review of known suicides from 2001-2018. It’s been confirmed that the legislation is not required for this initial work to proceed. The fact that this legislation has not gone to a vote means that it remains on the Senate’s Notice Paper until it is resolved. Until it is no longer on the Notice Paper, it is not defeated. With little notice, the Government can bring anything that sits on the Notice Paper up for debate. With little notice, debate can be brought to an abrupt end, and a final vote be taken. The Government will not do that (as it would amount to rushing into a loss), preferring instead to keep open the chance to persuade one Senator presently opposed to the National Commissioner to either change their mind or abstain from the vote. (With a Senator abstaining from the final vote, the total available number of votes is 75, not 76. Considering that passage requires an absolute majority, which in the event of an abstention is 38, the Government would achieve the same outcome from a Senator abstaining as it would from a Senator voting with them.)In short, the battle continues. The Government does not have the numbers to pass their legislation; we do not have the numbers to have it discarded.

Without a change to the numbers in the Senate, the legislation will come to a vote at a moment of the Government’s choosing (if ever).I’m firmly of the view that victory isn’t simply depriving one’s opponent of victory. Until this is won, it’s not. But we are winning. That much is clear. Between now and the new year, my focus will be on campaigning as if nothing has changed :

telling the public what the difference is between the Government’s National Commissioner and a Royal Commission and where the Government’s model falls short. Defeating the National Commissioner is a critical step in the campaign for a Royal Commission.

It remains an important obstacle to overcome. Defeating it requires more than blocking from it coming to a vote. We seek a vote, which we will win. Then, having won, we just keep going.



Yours Sincerely, Senator Jacqui Lambie Senator for Tasmania